What the hell is "stochastic violence"?

MaryL

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2011
24,453
16,678
1,405
Midwestern U.S.
And WHY is that term only applicable only to Republicans, whites or anyone that disagrees with Democrats? But hey, Lib Dems & "Social justice advocates" supporting BLM and media anti police rhetoric and incited riots in 2020 across America:

1708310352136.png
 
Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2. 🌐🔥
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2. 🌐🔥
This post is confusing. Edward slow poke does have issues, But I digress.
 
Hmmm. It seems to me that someone should attach a picture of Biden's red-themed fearmongering speech about maga next to this definition. Dems aren't very self-aware.
 
And WHY is that term only applicable only to Republicans, whites or anyone that disagrees with Democrats? But hey, Lib Dems & "Social justice advocates" supporting BLM and media anti police rhetoric and incited riots in 2020 across America:

View attachment 904640

A. It's a big word meaning that you egged people on without directly instructing them. It lets people (and I use the term loosely since they are most tRumplings or tRump himself) say things like "those second amendment people, they might be able to do something" without being on tape saying "shoot them now"


B, It doesn't only apply to republicans, they just practice it regularly where as normal people don't do shit like that.
 
Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2. 🌐🔥

A. It's a big word meaning that you egged people on without directly instructing them. It lets people (and I use the term loosely since they are most tRumplings or tRump himself) say things like "those second amendment people, they might be able to do something" without being on tape saying "shoot them now"


B, It doesn't only apply to republicans, they just practice it regularly where as normal people don't do shit like that.
Nice try. Democommies actually, in real time, (not some politically ideological contrived theoretical subjective maybe sorta perhaps scenario,) BUT actually drove that huge and faulty narrative that cause anti-police anti white race riots in 2020. And Democommies and their apologists aren't gonna weasel their way out of THAT.
 
Nice try. Democommies actually, in real time, (not some politically ideological contrived theoretical subjective maybe sorta perhaps scenario,) BUT actually drove that huge and faulty narrative that cause anti-police anti white race riots in 2020. And Democommies and their apologists aren't gonna weasel their way out of THAT.
So when confronted iwth objective facts, you dive into the conspiracy tank.
 

Forum List

Back
Top