Ravi
Diamond Member
I see you've met Pubic.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night awayfrom seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see you've met Pubic.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night awayfrom seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Obviously you don't care if anyone that has an alternate viewpoint is discriminated against...I find that sad.MM...I don't know if anyone answered your question, and I don't remember the exact wording of it, but yes, there are laws that mention the word homosexual...
http://www.lc.org/profamily/samesex_adoption_by_state.pdf(3) No person eligible to adopt under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual.
Well holy fucking crap, it took 490 posts in this thread before somebody posted something that specifically identified homosexuals as it pertains to law. It only mentions 4 states out of 50, so we got a pretty good track record.
Now, is anybody going to link the actual government website that states the laws claimed in the pdf link?
Your "feelings" are that gays threaten your marriage...well guess what, you are an hysterical asshole ruled by your feelings...and I feel sorry for the woman (if she is one) that married your wussy ass.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Paperview, your 'feelings' are very common amongst the least common denominators... of course the bad news here is that such is a function of delusion, founded in ignorance and pretty much the default position of the average panty-waste.
My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Obviously you don't care if anyone that has an alternate viewpoint is discriminated against...I find that sad.MM...I don't know if anyone answered your question, and I don't remember the exact wording of it, but yes, there are laws that mention the word homosexual...
http://www.lc.org/profamily/samesex_adoption_by_state.pdf
Well holy fucking crap, it took 490 posts in this thread before somebody posted something that specifically identified homosexuals as it pertains to law. It only mentions 4 states out of 50, so we got a pretty good track record.
Now, is anybody going to link the actual government website that states the laws claimed in the pdf link?
Some dream.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
My homoerotic dreams involve two lipstick lesbians. I better start drinking faster.
Some dream.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
My homoerotic dreams involve two lipstick lesbians. I better start drinking faster.
Others do.
What's not reasonable about those arguments... as you've projected them, of course.
And please, be specific; at least to the extent that your intellectual limitations allow.
Now set back and enjoy the response friends...
Highest probability is the challenge goes ignored... if she works up the courage to respond, we'll find that she will be unable to show how ANY of whatever 'argument' she finds in her isolated examples of other sexual abnomralities and behavior's relevant to low moral character... are unreasonable arguments; as there is virtually no distinction from any of the sexual abnormalities listed and the abnormlaity of homosexuality.
But it should be interesting to watch the sub-intellect stretch for something of which they're incapable.
Now Devnell would have LIKED to have responded to this post with a well reasoned, logically valid, intellectually sound argument...
Sadly, Devnell lacks sufficient cognitive means to offer such; and as a result was relegated by her impotence, to advancing a flaccid little neg-rep to this post; wherein she fiegned 'yawn...'
But I believe in giving credit where credit is due... so let's give Devnell a big USMB hand, for doing the VERY BEST that she can... God bless'er...
LOL...
Humanists...
If anyone would like to neg-rep devnell, just for the hell of it... you can do so at this link:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/91004-what-rights-are-the-gays-missing-11.html#post1601127
Ravi would have LOVED to have advanced a well reasoned, intellectually sound, logically valid argument, in response to this post...
But like all of her little faggot friends, she's unable to offer up such and instead, decided to neg-rep it...
For those who would like to offer RAVI a Neg-rep in return, you can find her at this link:
Now I will warn ya that this imbecile carries a serious neg-rep... but she knows it and uses her rep-means to control the reputation level of those members whose views she feels are not worthy...
But I encourage everyone to use the above link to Neg-rep the shit out of her... just to show a leftist that whatever power they might bring to the table against us is only going to get shoved right up their collective asses.
I neg rep you when your hatred of women shines through...which is in almost every post you make.
No silly, no drinks here.Some dream.My homoerotic dreams involve two lipstick lesbians. I better start drinking faster.
Others do.
You drank two six packs already?
Yeah, I thought things weren't supposed to be based on feelings... *scratches head*Your "feelings" are that gays threaten your marriage...well guess what, you are an hysterical asshole ruled by your feelings...and I feel sorry for the woman (if she is one) that married your wussy ass.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Paperview, your 'feelings' are very common amongst the least common denominators... of course the bad news here is that such is a function of delusion, founded in ignorance and pretty much the default position of the average panty-waste.
Your "feelings" are that gays threaten your marriage...well guess what, you are an hysterical asshole ruled by your feelings...and I feel sorry for the woman (if she is one) that married your wussy ass.My personal feeling is that people who think homosexuality is a choice are often just two sixpacks and a lonely night away from seeing their haunting homoerotic dreams becoming a reality.
Paperview, your 'feelings' are very common amongst the least common denominators... of course the bad news here is that such is a function of delusion, founded in ignorance and pretty much the default position of the average panty-waste.
But I've certainly had some fun with some fine, beautiful women.
Fifty years ago, no American would have ever dreamed that there would be legal sodomite marriage, homos in the military, or faggot couples allowed to adopt children.
So it's not hard to imagine 50 years from now; legal pedophilia and legal beastuality.
50 years ago a black person could not marry a white person in many parts of the United States
If you say so...Fifty years ago, no American would have ever dreamed that there would be legal sodomite marriage, homos in the military, or faggot couples allowed to adopt children.
So it's not hard to imagine 50 years from now; legal pedophilia and legal beastuality.
50 years ago a black person could not marry a white person in many parts of the United States
And now it's the standard for successful black guys to find a gullible, dimwit, white trophy blonde to marry and abuse, in O.J.s case, to murder by slashing her throat.
I can't imagine what makes people so vehement about this subject. Nobody can force being gay upon one. They must have some deep seated inner phobia or be nosy control freaks.
I don't think so. The conservative right is an odd bunch.
They insist they don't want to be told what to do by "big government" yet have leaders that tell them the most outrageous and nonsensical things, yet they eat it up like pablum.
They want government out of the bedroom, yet have this lurid fascination with gays and "what they must be doing".
So you feel that the public courthouse is something akin to the bed-room?
It never ceases to fascinate me how you twisted fucks can't come to grips with the meaning of privacy... it's your eternal standard you wave, even as you're standing on flat bed trailers in open-asses leather chaps, shouting your presents and your PUBLIC PRIDE IN BEING DEVIENTS, or on the steps to the Courthouse as you demand more PUBLIC policy to advance your EXCEEDINGLY PUBLIC SEXUALITY.
The truth is, there's absolutely NOTHING private about the homosexual advocacy. It's about nothing if it is not about the public normalization of the sexually abnormal and turning PUBLIC POLICY in so doing.
Gays aren't missing any rights at all. Civil unions are are the exact same thing as marriage and are allowed in many states.
Where "marriage" comes in is this. Since marriage is associated with religion and there is a separation of church and state, the gay community which is vehemently anti-religion wants this specific term "marriage" to replace the term "civil union" in their bid to further their anti-religion stance.
They already have common law protection in many States and civil union laws. I think there should be a civil union law in every state. As far as marriage...that should remain as it is...a union between man and woman.
The only rights they're missing is Vaseline at 50% off. Now get back in the closet where you belong.
Consummation of marriage is a religious thing. I'm not religious.
F
A
I
L
Spells rdean
Care to address the point I made? Or do you just want to try and pretend your opinion is a fact?
A "marriage" with no sex? How is that a marriage? Why not just make him a "dependent"?
It's not a marriage... As marriage is the joining of a man and a woman... sanctifying their sexuality as one entity.
Fifty years ago, no American would have ever dreamed that there would be legal sodomite marriage, homos in the military, or faggot couples allowed to adopt children.
So it's not hard to imagine 50 years from now; legal pedophilia and legal beastuality.
50 years ago a black person could not marry a white person in many parts of the United States
And now it's the standard for successful black guys to find a gullible, dimwit, white trophy blonde to marry and abuse, in O.J.s case, to murder by slashing her throat.