What real lynching looks like..

[jtpr312]

And that's why we read you for silliness, jtpr312.

You are advocating murder.

That's why I think you are a jackass and a fool, you don't understand the difference between justice and murder.

 

[Stephanie]

Liberals-Democrats have to try and brainwash the youngsters by changing the DEMOCRATS history of racism, the KKK, etc...

You see them do it all the time like in this thread

how else do they get the voters? that and promise them they are there to TAKE CARE OF THEM by implementing Socialism and ENSLAVING them all over again, take ObamaCare for an example...Youngsters are now FORCED to buy insurance where they never had to before because they didn't need it...how sad they voted to make themselves "SLAVES" to the Federal Government..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Liberals-Democrats have to try and brainwash the youngsters by changing the DEMOCRATS history of racism, the KKK, etc...

You see them do it all the time like in this thread

how else do they get the voters? that and promise them they are there to TAKE CARE OF THEM by implementing Socialism and ENSLAVING them all over again, take ObamaCare for an example...Youngsters are now FORCED to buy insurance where they never had to before because they didn't need it...how sad they voted to make themselves "SLAVES" to the Federal Government..

Progressives like Starkey are pathological liars, hence when discussion racism they substitute "Conservative" for Democrat.

 

[Stephanie]

the lynchings continue on by the Democrats in this country
why would you want to belong to a political party (Democrat party) who speaks this way about people?

SNIP:

Democrat Charlie Rangel: Tea Party Bunch of “White Crackers”

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, August 2, 2013, 11:21 AM

When the Civil War ended, and after Republican President Abraham Lincoln liberated the slaves in the south, Democrats initiated Jim Crow laws to punish blacks. Democrats discriminated against blacks. In fact, the KKK, was founded as the the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party.

The Ku Klux Klan assassinated many Republicans including Republican Representative James M. Hinds (December 5, 1833—October 22, 1868) of Little Rock. Hinds represented Arkansas in the United States Congress from June 24, 1868 through October 22, 1868.

Despite the facts…
Corrupt Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) accused the Tea Party of being the same group of “White Crackers” who fought against Civil Rights.
TPM reported:


In an interview with the Daily Beast (leftwing hate site)published Friday, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) suggested Tea Partiers are the “same group” who fought for segregation during the Civil Rights movement.

“It is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police. They didn’t care about how they looked,” Rangel said.

all of it here
Democrat Charlie Rangel: Tea Party Bunch of ?White Crackers? | The Gateway Pundit

 

[JakeStarkey]

And that's why we read you for silliness, jtpr312.

You are advocating murder.

That's why I think you are a jackass and a fool, you don't understand the difference between justice and murder.

And we are going to take listens on your idea of "justice" from an ex-con and gang thug?

 

[007]

This thread is one of the best examples I've ever seen on the board of how hypocritical, lying, two faced a bunch the libroids on this board are, period.

 

[Sunshine]

Liberals-Democrats have to try and brainwash the youngsters by changing the DEMOCRATS history of racism, the KKK, etc...

You see them do it all the time like in this thread

how else do they get the voters? that and promise them they are there to TAKE CARE OF THEM by implementing Socialism and ENSLAVING them all over again, take ObamaCare for an example...Youngsters are now FORCED to buy insurance where they never had to before because they didn't need it...how sad they voted to make themselves "SLAVES" to the Federal Government..

What they are trying to do, not very effectively I might add, is to say, 'back then Republicans were Democrats. I was born under Truman who became concerned about civil rights issues and I vividly remember Eisenhower. They were NOT democrats. Not by a long stretch. Truman, concerned about civil rights in this country, is the one who ordered the use of nuclear weapons on brown people on the other side of the world. Eisenhower was a solder, a general who distinguished himself in war. He was not a draft dodging Democrat, nor was he a socialist. If you do a little research and look at the lynchings swallow posted you will see that said lynchings occurred during both Republican AND Democratic administrations. None of them occurred under Truman or Eisenhower who people on here are trying to make into Democrats which they were not.

Also, if you look at the issues that sparked them you will not see any partisan issues. You will see mob rule and groupthink, though, something that runs rampant with the so called 'progressives' on this forum.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course people were lynched after WWII, in both administrations. Race murder occurred right through the term of Truman and Eisenhower. They were done by bad people in both parties. That 'mob rule and group think' ruled the a bad wing within the conservatives of the South.

 

[Sunshine]

Of course people were lynched after WWII, in both administrations. Race murder occurred right through the term of Truman and Eisenhower. They were done by bad people in both parties. That 'mob rule and group think' ruled the a bad wing within the conservatives of the South.

In 1946, a mob of white men shot and killed two young African-American couples near Moore's Ford Bridge in Walton County, Georgia 60 miles east of Atlanta. This lynching of four young sharecroppers, one a World War II veteran, shocked the nation. The attack was a key factor in President Harry S. Truman's making civil rights a priority of his administration. Although the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigated the crime, they were unable to prosecute. It was the last documented lynching of so many people.[45]

Lynching in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That was the last black lynching in the US. If you want to claim that every interracial murder is a 'lynching' then at this current period in history there are far more lynchings of whites by blacks than vice versa. But I'm sure you don't want to go there and look that dense in front of all your liberal peers.

As to groupthink. Just look at this forum. So called liberals are in complete lockstep. Conservatives differ from one another on many issues.

The truly bad people are those like the liberals on this thread who want to shake off their own evil and violent history and put it squarely on the back of people who actually championed civil rights. Republicans have NEVER been Democrats. And saying that they were is patently stupid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course people were lynched after WWII, in both administrations. Race murder occurred right through the term of Truman and Eisenhower. They were done by bad people in both parties. That 'mob rule and group think' ruled the a bad wing within the conservatives of the South.

In 1946, a mob of white men shot and killed two young African-American couples near Moore's Ford Bridge in Walton County, Georgia 60 miles east of Atlanta. This lynching of four young sharecroppers, one a World War II veteran, shocked the nation. The attack was a key factor in President Harry S. Truman's making civil rights a priority of his administration. Although the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigated the crime, they were unable to prosecute. It was the last documented lynching of so many people.[45]

Lynching in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That was the last black lynching in the US. If you want to claim that every interracial murder is a 'lynching' then at this current period in history there are far more lynchings of whites by blacks than vice versa. But I'm sure you don't want to go there and look that dense in front of all your liberal peers.

As to groupthink. Just look at this forum. So called liberals are in complete lockstep. Conservatives differ from one another on many issues.

The truly bad people are those like the liberals on this thread who want to shake off their own evil and violent history and put it squarely on the back of people who actually championed civil rights. Republicans have NEVER been Democrats.

Not as race statements, no there were not. You can allege all you want but you can't prove it.

Race murder by groupthink reactonary conservative whites on blacks to maintain white Southern culture occurred in both admins. Below is a famous story of reactonary conservative southern groupthink in 1955.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eWM3TLb0x0]Bob Dylan - The Death of Emmett Till Project - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Sallow]

Liberals-Democrats have to try and brainwash the youngsters by changing the DEMOCRATS history of racism, the KKK, etc...

You see them do it all the time like in this thread

how else do they get the voters? that and promise them they are there to TAKE CARE OF THEM by implementing Socialism and ENSLAVING them all over again, take ObamaCare for an example...Youngsters are now FORCED to buy insurance where they never had to before because they didn't need it...how sad they voted to make themselves "SLAVES" to the Federal Government..

What they are trying to do, not very effectively I might add, is to say, 'back then Republicans were Democrats. I was born under Truman who became concerned about civil rights issues and I vividly remember Eisenhower. They were NOT democrats. Not by a long stretch. Truman, concerned about civil rights in this country, is the one who ordered the use of nuclear weapons on brown people on the other side of the world. Eisenhower was a solder, a general who distinguished himself in war. He was not a draft dodging Democrat, nor was he a socialist. If you do a little research and look at the lynchings swallow posted you will see that said lynchings occurred during both Republican AND Democratic administrations. None of them occurred under Truman or Eisenhower who people on here are trying to make into Democrats which they were not.

Also, if you look at the issues that sparked them you will not see any partisan issues. You will see mob rule and groupthink, though, something that runs rampant with the so called 'progressives' on this forum.

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

 

[Sunshine]

Liberals-Democrats have to try and brainwash the youngsters by changing the DEMOCRATS history of racism, the KKK, etc...

You see them do it all the time like in this thread

how else do they get the voters? that and promise them they are there to TAKE CARE OF THEM by implementing Socialism and ENSLAVING them all over again, take ObamaCare for an example...Youngsters are now FORCED to buy insurance where they never had to before because they didn't need it...how sad they voted to make themselves "SLAVES" to the Federal Government..

What they are trying to do, not very effectively I might add, is to say, 'back then Republicans were Democrats. I was born under Truman who became concerned about civil rights issues and I vividly remember Eisenhower. They were NOT democrats. Not by a long stretch. Truman, concerned about civil rights in this country, is the one who ordered the use of nuclear weapons on brown people on the other side of the world. Eisenhower was a solder, a general who distinguished himself in war. He was not a draft dodging Democrat, nor was he a socialist. If you do a little research and look at the lynchings swallow posted you will see that said lynchings occurred during both Republican AND Democratic administrations. None of them occurred under Truman or Eisenhower who people on here are trying to make into Democrats which they were not.

Also, if you look at the issues that sparked them you will not see any partisan issues. You will see mob rule and groupthink, though, something that runs rampant with the so called 'progressives' on this forum.

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, Sallow would not, Sunshine. But your revision inaccurately portrays the South in the 1940s and 1950s.

 

[thanatos144]

This is something people should come to understand.

Black Women who were Lynched in America | Henrietta Vinton Davis's Weblog

Jennie Steers
On July 25, 1903 a mob lynched Jennie Steers on the Beard Plantation in Louisiana for supposedly giving a white teenager, 16 year-old Elizabeth Dolan, a glass of poisoned lemonade. Before they killed her, the mob tried to force her to confess but she refused and was hanged. (100 Years at Lynching. Ralph Ginzburg)

Laura Nelson
Laura Nelson was lynched on May 23, 1911 In Okemah, Okluskee, Oklahoma. Her fifteen year old son was also lynched at the same time but I could not find a photo of her son. The photograph of Nelson was drawn from a postcard. Authorities accused her of killing a deputy sheriff who supposedly stumbled on some stolen goods in her house. Why they lynched her child is a mystery. The mob raped and dragged Nelson six miles to the Canadian River and hanged her from a bridge.(NAACP: One Hundred Years of Lynching in the US 1889-1918 )

Ann Barksdale or Ann Bostwick
The lynchers maintained that Ann Barksdale or Ann Bostwlck killed her female employer in Pinehurst, Georgia on June 24, 1912. Nobody knows if or why Barksdale or Bostick killed her employer because there was no trial and no one thought to take a statement from this Black woman who authorities claimed had ”violent fits of insanity” and should have been placed in a hospital. Nobody was arrested and the crowd was In a festive mood. Placed in a car with a rope around her neck, and the other end tied to a tree limb, the lynchers drove at high speed and she was strangled to death. For good measure the mob shot her eyes out and shot enough bullets Into her body that she was “cut in two.”

Marie Scott
March 31, 1914, a white mob of at least a dozen males, yanked seventeen year-old Marie Scott from jail, threw a rope over her head as she screamed and hanged her from a telephone pole in Wagoner County, Oklahoma. What happened? Two drunken white men barged Into her house as she was dressing. They locked themselves in her room and criminally “assaulted” her. Her brother apparently heard her screams for help, kicked down the door, killed one assailant and fled. Some accounts state that the assailant was stabbed. Frustrated by their inability to lynch Marie Scott’s brother the mob lynched Marie Scott. (Crisis 1914 and 100 Years of Lynching)

Them evil fucking democrats.

 

[Sallow]

What they are trying to do, not very effectively I might add, is to say, 'back then Republicans were Democrats. I was born under Truman who became concerned about civil rights issues and I vividly remember Eisenhower. They were NOT democrats. Not by a long stretch. Truman, concerned about civil rights in this country, is the one who ordered the use of nuclear weapons on brown people on the other side of the world. Eisenhower was a solder, a general who distinguished himself in war. He was not a draft dodging Democrat, nor was he a socialist. If you do a little research and look at the lynchings swallow posted you will see that said lynchings occurred during both Republican AND Democratic administrations. None of them occurred under Truman or Eisenhower who people on here are trying to make into Democrats which they were not.

Also, if you look at the issues that sparked them you will not see any partisan issues. You will see mob rule and groupthink, though, something that runs rampant with the so called 'progressives' on this forum.

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

Not hateful at all.

And I didn't become a cop..because in the end when I asked myself if I could shoot someone? I couldn't. That really wouldn't work out.

On the other hand..you've posted stuff that puts on display that if lynching were still legal, you'd be at walmart purchasing books on knots and ropes.

 

[Pop23]

What they are trying to do, not very effectively I might add, is to say, 'back then Republicans were Democrats. I was born under Truman who became concerned about civil rights issues and I vividly remember Eisenhower. They were NOT democrats. Not by a long stretch. Truman, concerned about civil rights in this country, is the one who ordered the use of nuclear weapons on brown people on the other side of the world. Eisenhower was a solder, a general who distinguished himself in war. He was not a draft dodging Democrat, nor was he a socialist. If you do a little research and look at the lynchings swallow posted you will see that said lynchings occurred during both Republican AND Democratic administrations. None of them occurred under Truman or Eisenhower who people on here are trying to make into Democrats which they were not.

Also, if you look at the issues that sparked them you will not see any partisan issues. You will see mob rule and groupthink, though, something that runs rampant with the so called 'progressives' on this forum.

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

And BINGO was his name Ooooooooooo

But sallows not ACTUALLY physically lynching anyone, so it's OK

That's how they roll

 

[Pop23]

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

Not hateful at all.

And I didn't become a cop..because in the end when I asked myself if I could shoot someone? I couldn't. That really wouldn't work out.

On the other hand..you've posted stuff that puts on display that if lynching were still legal, you'd be at walmart purchasing books on knots and ropes.

I'll bet you could if you we're having your head pounded against a concrete sidewalk

No?

Guess we will never actually know.

 

[Sallow]

Your understanding of history is incredibly ignorant..almost to the point of fantasy.

I would call it revisionist, but that would be kind. It is beyond that.

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

And BINGO was his name Ooooooooooo

But sallows not ACTUALLY physically lynching anyone, so it's OK

That's how they roll

And the Greek Choir chimes in.

 

[Sallow]

All you are doing is trying to stir up civil unrest. I've seen your kind. And I've seen the result. You are vile and hateful. You would kill every white person if you thought it would serve your purpose. But it doesn't because someone has to work and pay you to sit all day on her spewing your racist venom.

Not hateful at all.

And I didn't become a cop..because in the end when I asked myself if I could shoot someone? I couldn't. That really wouldn't work out.

On the other hand..you've posted stuff that puts on display that if lynching were still legal, you'd be at walmart purchasing books on knots and ropes.

I'll bet you could if you we're having your head pounded against a concrete sidewalk

No?

Guess we will never actually know.

This thread is about Lynching.

Keep up.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The reactionary conservatives' arguments here, having no real answer, to the OP are dissolving into silliness and personal attacks.