No. Some people use logic and some use emotion. The founding fathers argued angrily even to the drastic measure of a deadly duel. Being able to distinguish important points from logic OR emotion is a talent as important as making points.
Eggs - ackly. I'm usually more interested in how the arguments were arrived at, than what the arguments are. Unless it's a topic area I have particular expertise in, that's most of what I do here.
There's a whole lotta mythologizing going on too, or in the contemporary term "fake news/fake history", and I find myself spending inordinately massive time shooting those myths down with historical fact. I don't mind learning the history, I like it, but I do mind the idea that one can just ignore reality and reshape it to whatever one wants. If we can't agree on what reality is, we have literally no starting point.