Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The issue is extremely interesting to me. Please answer the following questions:
1.Are you against gay marriage?
2.Are you gay/straight/bisexual?
3.What country or state do you live in?
Let's see the result of such inquiry.
What is you personal attitude to gay marriage?
The issue is extremely interesting to me. Please answer the following questions:
1.Are you against gay marriage?
2.Are you gay/straight/bisexual?
3.What country or state do you live in?
Marriage has always been between member of the opposite sex, even if numbers varied in different cultures.I live in Maryland, senior citizen, white, married
I think two consenting adults, whatever their sexual preferences, should be allowed to marry and share all of the personal and legal benefits that result.
It doesn't. That makes you a libtard.None of my business.
Although that it freaks out and pisses off conservatards is most entertaining.
Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
1.Are you against gay marriage?
2.Are you gay/straight/bisexual?
3.What country or state do you live in?
Let's see the result of such inquiry.
Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
I don't care what it's called but people should make their own legal arrangements and government strikes the word marriage out of its' dictionary.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
Only if you are a brunette with at least 40DD's.....and a real vagina...
they normally ask about spouses....I don't care what it's called but people should make their own legal arrangements and government strikes the word marriage out of its' dictionary.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
They forced health insurance companies to do that years ago here, they made it illegal to use the words 'wife, husband, marriage and divorce'. Time for them to follow their own rules.
Only if you are a brunette with at least 40DD's.....and a real vagina...
I don't watch South Park.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
South Park's "Follow That Egg" episode was along these lines. Colorado governor suggesting a compromise, "Instead of 'marriage' how about 'butt buddies?' So instead of having and being husbands, you're butt buddies?'"
That would settle the issue.I don't care what it's called but people should make their own legal arrangements and government strikes the word marriage out of its' dictionary.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
They forced health insurance companies to do that years ago here, they made it illegal to use the words 'wife, husband, marriage and divorce'. Time for them to follow their own rules.
I don't watch South Park.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
South Park's "Follow That Egg" episode was along these lines. Colorado governor suggesting a compromise, "Instead of 'marriage' how about 'butt buddies?' So instead of having and being husbands, you're butt buddies?'"
I'm not wild about marriage in the first place...That would settle the issue.I don't care what it's called but people should make their own legal arrangements and government strikes the word marriage out of its' dictionary.Just call it a contract, not a marriage, and I am happy.I'm against it. It forces insurance companies to cover spouses when gays do much better financially than heteros because most male female marriages lead to the most expensive thing(s) you ever have. Same for tax benefits, etc. I see no rational reason to deny three or more people to marry if we are going to have legal homosexual marriages so I want the government to get out of the marriage business altogether.
Draw up a contract and marry your dog if you want.
Not that I find it anything to worry about personally, but stupid is stupid.
They forced health insurance companies to do that years ago here, they made it illegal to use the words 'wife, husband, marriage and divorce'. Time for them to follow their own rules.
Marriage should only be a religious rite.
