Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Lol1. What is a "quick change" ammo mag?Any gun that accepts a quick change ammo mag or belt feed ammo can be used as a WMD!
2. Can't pretty much anything be used as a WMD? How are you defining that?
If your argument is that a magazine release is a WMD and must, therefore, be banned, you are arguing that most modern handguns are WMDs.
Even the flaky, half-assed SCOTUS in Heller disagrees with you.
.
Miller did no such thing.But, the same case to which he would refer in declaring (in dicta) that machine guns dangerous, would also hold that handguns (including mag-fed semi-autos) are protected under the 2nd Amendment.He's arguing that magazine fed semi-autos are dangerous to the general population in the same way that machine guns have been considered too dangerous to the general public
That's a losing position.
.
You're babbling. None of that makes any senseYou mean other than the FACT that you can't buy one made after 1986 at all and those prior are heavily regulated?What makes you think the 2A doesn't protect the right to keep and bear machine guns?
I mean, other than your own ignorance and bigotry?
When did the USSC uphold those regulations?Not according to the Supreme Court.and that regulation is in violation of the 2nd amendment,,,You mean other than the FACT that you can't buy one made after 1986 at all and those prior are heavily regulated?What makes you think the 2A doesn't protect the right to keep and bear machine guns?
I mean, other than your own ignorance and bigotry?
With no hope of providing a sound argument to that effect.He's arguing that magazine fed semi-autos are dangerous to the general population in the same way that machine guns have been considered too dangerous to the general public
Heller?Miller did no such thing.But, the same case to which he would refer in declaring (in dicta) that machine guns dangerous, would also hold that handguns (including mag-fed semi-autos) are protected under the 2nd Amendment.He's arguing that magazine fed semi-autos are dangerous to the general population in the same way that machine guns have been considered too dangerous to the general public
That's a losing position.
.
so no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.Yes both of them are covered under the second...doesnt matter since both are covered under the 2nd,,,
But that does not make them the same thing
as far as the 2nd goes yes they are,,,
and daryls got you right where he wants you,,,
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
so no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.Yes both of them are covered under the second...
But that does not make them the same thing
as far as the 2nd goes yes they are,,,
and daryls got you right where he wants you,,,
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
They were AR-15 Model 750s or LE6920s which both can be purchased at the better Gun Shop. Just not at Rustbuckets. But because they were sold to the Military they were redesignated M-16 because they had to have the M designator. You can't change the way the Military Operates and the way Colt operates no matter how many GOTCHA'S you try and get.
And you promised to not have anything to do with me. It figures. You'll lie about that as much as anything else. I don't expect anything else from a party of trump. Sure will be glad when the Republicans grow a pair and take back what they should have never lost. Maybe I will go back to voting Republican again.
Please explain where Heller addressed machine gunsHeller?Miller did no such thing.But, the same case to which he would refer in declaring (in dicta) that machine guns dangerous, would also hold that handguns (including mag-fed semi-autos) are protected under the 2nd Amendment.He's arguing that magazine fed semi-autos are dangerous to the general population in the same way that machine guns have been considered too dangerous to the general public
That's a losing position.
.
.
Tell it to all the people murdered in El Paso and Dayton and Pittsburgh and Sandy Hook and Parkland and on and on...and their familiesso no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.as far as the 2nd goes yes they are,,,
and daryls got you right where he wants you,,,
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
They were AR-15 Model 750s or LE6920s which both can be purchased at the better Gun Shop. Just not at Rustbuckets. But because they were sold to the Military they were redesignated M-16 because they had to have the M designator. You can't change the way the Military Operates and the way Colt operates no matter how many GOTCHA'S you try and get.
And you promised to not have anything to do with me. It figures. You'll lie about that as much as anything else. I don't expect anything else from a party of trump. Sure will be glad when the Republicans grow a pair and take back what they should have never lost. Maybe I will go back to voting Republican again.
Is one of these an "assault rifle"? If so, which one?
Heller addressed machine guns in dicta, but the case at issue was the D.C. handgun ban. Most handguns are semi-auto, magazine fed weapons.Please explain where Heller addressed machine gunsHeller?Miller did no such thing.But, the same case to which he would refer in declaring (in dicta) that machine guns dangerous, would also hold that handguns (including mag-fed semi-autos) are protected under the 2nd Amendment.He's arguing that magazine fed semi-autos are dangerous to the general population in the same way that machine guns have been considered too dangerous to the general public
That's a losing position.
.
.
Take your appeal to emotion and shove it up your fucking ass.Tell it to all the people murdered in El Paso and Dayton and Pittsburgh and Sandy Hook and Parkland and on and on...and their familiesso no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
They were AR-15 Model 750s or LE6920s which both can be purchased at the better Gun Shop. Just not at Rustbuckets. But because they were sold to the Military they were redesignated M-16 because they had to have the M designator. You can't change the way the Military Operates and the way Colt operates no matter how many GOTCHA'S you try and get.
And you promised to not have anything to do with me. It figures. You'll lie about that as much as anything else. I don't expect anything else from a party of trump. Sure will be glad when the Republicans grow a pair and take back what they should have never lost. Maybe I will go back to voting Republican again.
Tell it to all the people murdered in El Paso and Dayton and Pittsburgh and Sandy Hook and Parkland and on and on...and their familiesso no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
They were AR-15 Model 750s or LE6920s which both can be purchased at the better Gun Shop. Just not at Rustbuckets. But because they were sold to the Military they were redesignated M-16 because they had to have the M designator. You can't change the way the Military Operates and the way Colt operates no matter how many GOTCHA'S you try and get.
And you promised to not have anything to do with me. It figures. You'll lie about that as much as anything else. I don't expect anything else from a party of trump. Sure will be glad when the Republicans grow a pair and take back what they should have never lost. Maybe I will go back to voting Republican again.
I do. Every day.Tell it to all the people murdered in El Paso and Dayton and Pittsburgh and Sandy Hook and Parkland and on and on...and their familiesso no - they can't buy the AR15 any "civilian" can buy.he's calling this a military weapon but can't name a single military that uses the same AR15 everyone sees and relates to.
I named two. Poland until 2008 and the United States Army. But in both cases, they are stamped M-16 because there is no Military Designator for Rifle that doesn't start with an M. All of them are of the AR Family and share all but about 3 parts if you buy a decent AR. If you buy a piece of junk, all but about 3 parts will interchange with either a M-16 or M-4 but who the hell would want to.
And you promised you were done with me. Now get done with me already.
They were AR-15 Model 750s or LE6920s which both can be purchased at the better Gun Shop. Just not at Rustbuckets. But because they were sold to the Military they were redesignated M-16 because they had to have the M designator. You can't change the way the Military Operates and the way Colt operates no matter how many GOTCHA'S you try and get.
And you promised to not have anything to do with me. It figures. You'll lie about that as much as anything else. I don't expect anything else from a party of trump. Sure will be glad when the Republicans grow a pair and take back what they should have never lost. Maybe I will go back to voting Republican again.
When did the USSC uphold those regulations?Not according to the Supreme Court.and that regulation is in violation of the 2nd amendment,,,You mean other than the FACT that you can't buy one made after 1986 at all and those prior are heavily regulated?What makes you think the 2A doesn't protect the right to keep and bear machine guns?
I mean, other than your own ignorance and bigotry?
So we should allow terrorist with semi automatic handguns that accept quick changing 100 round magazines into packed baseball stadiums? Maybe he could wrap a few rubber bands around hand turning into full auto like a bump-stock! Because that's as American as Baseball, Apple Pie & Mass Murder!1. What is a "quick change" ammo mag?Any gun that accepts a quick change ammo mag or belt feed ammo can be used as a WMD!
2. Can't pretty much anything be used as a WMD? How are you defining that?
If your argument is that a magazine release is a WMD and must, therefore, be banned, you are arguing that most modern handguns are WMDs.
Even the flaky, half-assed SCOTUS in Heller disagrees with you.
.
how do you tell dead people anything???
THEYRE DEAD,,,,
I do. Every day.Tell it to their families and see if you can manage to walk away on the bloody stumps of legs you have after they kick the living shit outta youhow do you tell dead people anything???
THEYRE DEAD,,,,
So we should allow terrorist with semi automatic handguns that accept quick changing 100 round magazines into packed baseball stadiums? Maybe he could wrap a few rubber bands around hand turning into full auto like a bump-stock! Because that's as American as Baseball, Apple Pie & Mass Murder!1. What is a "quick change" ammo mag?Any gun that accepts a quick change ammo mag or belt feed ammo can be used as a WMD!
2. Can't pretty much anything be used as a WMD? How are you defining that?
If your argument is that a magazine release is a WMD and must, therefore, be banned, you are arguing that most modern handguns are WMDs.
Even the flaky, half-assed SCOTUS in Heller disagrees with you.
.
