NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
I agree.Well... I'd say that's prison but... Pretty sure all of those are there.Let them move into a "poor house": no drugs, no extra rooms, no extra TVs, no beauty treatments, no tatoos.
*blink*blink*If they cannot get a job and get out, then after a set amount of time, give them a "modest" place, and let them eat in a common kitchen (they can use Michelle Obama's school menus) to keep them healthy. No one should want to stay on "handouts".
And you would pay for that with... Taxes?
Here's my stance point blank.
You have to not tax the living wage, because frankly all you'll be doing is take money from them, and then give them more back in the form of goods/services in which to live. But now you are also paying the fee's for the bureaucracy of it.
It's flat out cheaper not to tax people in poverty. And that's the logical view pure math and economics.... Without any bullshit right dominant brain help your fellow man out you rich bastards getting in the way of it.
A flat tax on anyone living above the poverty line.
To be revenue neutral that would amount to a big tax increase on middle/lower middle income Americans.