What Happens If 20,000 Migrants Enter Your City ?

[protectionist]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

you are confusing our refugee problem with commerce. millions cross our border for commerce every day.

 

[protectionist]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

you are confusing our refugee problem with commerce. millions cross our border for commerce every day.

1, We don't HAVE a "refugee problem"

2. The US is the # 1 victim of economic imperialism in the world, with $138 Billion/year being lost in 2016. Worse now.

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

you are confusing our refugee problem with commerce. millions cross our border for commerce every day.

1, We don't HAVE a "refugee problem"

2. The US is the # 1 victim of economic imperialism in the world, with $138 Billion/year being lost in 2016. Worse now.

Why do you believe it is not a refugee problem?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

20,000 is paltry. Last month 70,000 were detained. Many were men with children they snatched along the way. Our boneheaded policies are encouraging kidnapping of children. Once taken into the caravan those children are abused and raped. All according to Democrat plans.

Two caravans a week: 70,000 detained along the southern border in February

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

you are confusing our refugee problem with commerce. millions cross our border for commerce every day.

1, We don't HAVE a "refugee problem"

2. The US is the # 1 victim of economic imperialism in the world, with $138 Billion/year being lost in 2016. Worse now.

Why do you believe it is not a refugee problem?

Serfs Up! Otherwise, We Will Drown in a Tsunami of Self-Interested Xenophilia.

Giving refugees asylum is a scam by cheap-labor Limousine Liberals. Every time some foreign tyranny erupts into anarchy, the anti-American liars pretend it is in our practical interest to intervene, or else we will face what they claim is a "refugee problem."

Out of self-interest and contempt for their fellow Americans, the transnationalist traitors make up that problem and spin their foreigner-loving treason as "only being pragmatic." Let their fake victim-group of cowards, traitors, and criminal fugitives die shot down at our borders if those agents of our own ruling-class tyranny irresponsibly think they can bring us their problems and lay the guilt on us for not letting them freeload off our prosperity and security.

It is also in the interest of our ruling class to say that the oppressed, especially their own American servants, to run and hide away from their democratic responsibility to overthrow their own government and never ask an outside government to do so. A welcome mat inevitably turns us into a doormat, especially to be walked all over by all those who run away from a fight at home. Why infuse us with foreign cowardice, just because it makes our own Masters more secure when we ourselves get infected with that intentionally unmentioned addition to the list of contagious diseases these invaders always bring to our shores and borders?

 

[ph3iron]

Improve the IQ of the resident rubes?

Improve the knowledge of resident lnformation-deprived liberals (like you perhaps ?)

Your knowledge?
Let's start with you not knowing the derivation of liberal?
No Latin?
Liber, free.
I think my fellow corporate filthy rich friends are all proud ones
"For the individual and small gov"
And all you can to is post a pic of a wife cheater?

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy; revenue could be generated by foreign nationals and utilized to to recover costs.

what part of tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer is too difficult to understand.

Tourism doesn't come from penniless panhandlers. They only generate higher welfare budgets, loss of jobs to Americans, and loss of sales to US business due to remittances$$$.

you are confusing our refugee problem with commerce. millions cross our border for commerce every day.

1, We don't HAVE a "refugee problem"

2. The US is the # 1 victim of economic imperialism in the world, with $138 Billion/year being lost in 2016. Worse now.

Why do you believe it is not a refugee problem?

Serfs Up! Otherwise, We Will Drown in a Tsunami of Self-Interested Xenophilia.

Giving refugees asylum is a scam by cheap-labor Limousine Liberals. Every time some foreign tyranny erupts into anarchy, the anti-American liars pretend it is in our practical interest to intervene, or else we will face what they claim is a "refugee problem."

Out of self-interest and contempt for their fellow Americans, the transnationalist traitors make up that problem and spin their foreigner-loving treason as "only being pragmatic." Let their fake victim-group of cowards, traitors, and criminal fugitives die shot down at our borders if those agents of our own ruling-class tyranny irresponsibly think they can bring us their problems and lay the guilt on us for not letting them freeload off our prosperity and security.

It is also in the interest of our ruling class to say that the oppressed, especially their own American servants, to run and hide away from their democratic responsibility to overthrow their own government and never ask an outside government to do so. A welcome mat inevitably turns us into a doormat, especially to be walked all over by all those who run away from a fight at home. Why infuse us with foreign cowardice, just because it makes our own Masters more secure when we ourselves get infected with that intentionally unmentioned addition to the list of contagious diseases these invaders always bring to our shores and borders?

From my left wing perspective, it is merely an expensive and fake, right wing manufactured problem. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution. We should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause and we have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on border policy.

 

[protectionist]

Your knowledge?
Let's start with you not knowing the derivation of liberal?
No Latin?
Liber, free.
I think my fellow corporate filthy rich friends are all proud ones
"For the individual and small gov"
And all you can to is post a pic of a wife cheater?

I could post quizzes that you and your fellow information-deprived liberal victims of liberal OMMISION media, could not get a grade of 10% on. How do I know ? I 've already given than these quizzes, and none ever got higher than 10% (most got zero).

Wanna take the quizzes (Islamization and race/crime) and find out how much you don't know ? Fight or flight ?

 

[protectionist]

From my left wing perspective, it is merely an expensive and fake, right wing manufactured problem. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution. We should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause and we have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on border policy.

But we are. $138 Billion/year in remittances alone due to birthright citizenship given to IA kids, sanctuary cities/states, welfare to illegals, opposition to border wall, etc.

 

[danielpalos]

From my left wing perspective, it is merely an expensive and fake, right wing manufactured problem. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution. We should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause and we have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on border policy.

But we are. $138 Billion/year in remittances alone due to birthright citizenship given to IA kids, sanctuary cities/states, welfare to illegals, opposition to border wall, etc.

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

 

[Unkotare]

From my left wing perspective, it is merely an expensive and fake, right wing manufactured problem. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution. We should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause and we have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on border policy.

But we are. $138 Billion/year in remittances alone due to birthright citizenship given to IA kids, sanctuary cities/states, welfare to illegals, opposition to border wall, etc.

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

Would you give the SPAM a fucking break for a second? You do not understand the terms you were using, and you never have, shut the fuck up for at least a second.

 

[protectionist]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

 

[danielpalos]

From my left wing perspective, it is merely an expensive and fake, right wing manufactured problem. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution. We should have no illegal problem with our naturalization clause and we have a Commerce Clause and should not be losing money on border policy.

But we are. $138 Billion/year in remittances alone due to birthright citizenship given to IA kids, sanctuary cities/states, welfare to illegals, opposition to border wall, etc.

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

Would you give the SPAM a fucking break for a second? You do not understand the terms you were using, and you never have, shut the fuck up for at least a second.

You don't know what you are talking about; thus, I can't be the Troll.

 

[danielpalos]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

 

[Unkotare]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

Mental case

 

[80zephyr]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

Instead of simply repeating the same thing over and over, explain why your statement makes sense, because it doesn't from where I sit.

Mark

 

[protectionist]

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

Clause or no clause, the US is the # 1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today ($138 Billion/year lost in remittances) Updated 2019 number is even worse.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016​

 

[danielpalos]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

Mental case

Troll with Nothing but ad hominems. How special is that.

 

[danielpalos]

Your accounting methodology is wrong. We should have no illegal problem; our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause.

I'm not wrong - I'm stating facts from the Pew Research Center. The US is the #1 victim of economic imperialism in the world today, losing $138 Billion/year on remittances and that is an old number from 2016. Actual number in 209, is quite higher.

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016

Their paradigm is merely wrong. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; Only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy in that Case.

Instead of simply repeating the same thing over and over, explain why your statement makes sense, because it doesn't from where I sit.

Mark

Our Constitution is Express, not Implied, every time we may have to quibble about it.