Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
No, the Bible makes clear that homosexual acts are a sin, not being homosexual. A homosexual is defined as a person who is sexually attracted to people of one's own sex. There are homosexuals that do not engage in homosexual sex. Some homosexuals seek only love and companionship and seldom if ever engaged in homosexual acts.Why anyone would care what the jewish bible said is strange. But King David was obviously bisexual and Yahweh did not have an issue with it.
Fail? Total Fail. We are Christian. Jesus was a Jew. The entire Christian faith, is built on the foundation of the Jewish Faith. If there was no Jewish faith, there would be no Christian faith.
So.... yes, Bible-based Christians do care what the Jewish bible says.
No, David was not bi-sexual in any way. There is no possible way that one could even attempt to make that claim rationally.
Would Jesus Discriminate - David loved Jonathan more than women
Which has absolutely nothing at all to do with homosexuality. Love does not equal sex. You have sleep with 100 prostitutes, and they are nothing more than night of physical passion to you, and you are nothing more than a good customer to them.
Love is not the same as sex. When it said that David loved Jonathan, it had nothing to do with homosexuality. It had to do with a deep friendship. You talk to people who come back from war, and they have a type of friendship with someone that they bled and fought side by side with, that they simply don't have with their wife.
It not the same. The Bible makes it clear a thousand times over that Homosexuality is a sin. You will never prove that wrong, and no amount of randomly interpreting your own meaning into verses will change that.
You are still wrong.
“Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (Matthew 19:11-12)
Eunuchs who have been so from birth are gays
You might want to look up the definition of "eunuch", punkin, because I don't know a single gay person who wouldn't be MIGHTILY offended by your characterization.
Here, let me help, since English clearly is a problem for you.
Eunuch -
1
: a castrated man placed in charge of a harem or employed as a chamberlain in a palace
2
: a man or boy deprived of the testes or external genitals
3
: one that lacks virility or power <political eunuchs>
So a "eunuch from birth" would be someone who naturally has no sex drive, not someone who is sexually attracted to the same sex.
Can you be a bigger idiot?