What do you call a person who threatens violence then fails to follow up when the parameters are met

[Remodeling Maidiac]

A coward
A democrat
Obama
All of the above

Obama's 'red line' failure assured crisis in Syria

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

A coward
A democrat
Obama
All of the above

Obama's 'red line' failure assured crisis in Syria

A chicken shit liberal....

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

Your math is grossly incomplete because you left out Obama's red line factor.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

The poll is based on a false choice. All out war, which the poll implies, was not what was required by the coward known as Obama when his red line was crossed.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Hey corny, were there kids in those missiles? I missed that report.

 

[theHawk]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

The poll is based on a false choice. All out war, which the poll implies, was not what was required by the coward known as Obama when his red line was crossed.

Except it doesn’t say any such thing. If you would read the comments…you’d find that most posters—me and conservatives included wanted no part of any war in Syria.

Great, once again we declare ourselves the world's morality police and put our citizens at risk.
Every congressman who votes for this lunacy should be tarred and feathered.

By the way, it’s wonderful how the right wing regards an “act of war” under Obama vs. your messiah:

Who's advocating war? My understanding is that the administration is proposing a limited attack, not a full scale George W. Bush invasion like what happened in Iraq.

If any country shot 200 missiles into US territory would we consider it an act of war? Would we believe that that country had declared war on us? would we retaliate?
are we the neighborhood bully that beats up others because he can? or are we the beat cop who uses his nightstick on drunks that are making too much noise?

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

 

[theHawk]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

 

[ABikerSailor]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

Agreed. We blew over 70 million in the cost of the missiles, and we got a really crappy return on our money. Not only was the runway left intact and they were using it 8 hours later, but they didn't take out the bunkers that had the chemical weapons in the first place.

Kind of a lukewarm response if you ask me.

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

 

[theHawk]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

 

[ABikerSailor]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

Not yet, but they still have them. Trump failed to authorize them to take out the bunker containing the chemical weapons.

What do you think Trump will do if they are used again?

 

[candycorn]

When faced with the question of going into Syria, here is how the board reacted less than a year ago:

View attachment 121465

Given now that a republican is in the White House and, like all Republicans has no trouble sending someone else’s kids into the meat grinder, what does that make the members of the board who all of the sudden think war with Syria is cool?

A). Hypocrites
B). Republicans
C). A & B (the same thing)

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

 

[theHawk]

We still aren't going into Syria.

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, in all the talk of whether or not Trump should have launched the missiles or not, there is one thing that isn't being mentioned very often.......

Syria STILL has their chemical weapons! The attack Trump authorized didn't target the bunkers where they were stored. They said it was because they didn't want chemicals to pollute the area, but what else is there? Nothing but military people and a military base away from civilians.

They should have taken out the chemical weapons, but didn't. Syria still has them.

How long do you think it will be before Assad uses them again?

 

[candycorn]

I hope not. Nothing in Syria is worth one drop of American blood. Firing a bunch of missiles in there to “send a message” was useless.

To Muslims a crack over the head with a big stick sends a message they understand.

So much so, they launched attacks from the same air base the next day. Apparently the message wasn’t received.

Did they use chemical weapons?

Does it matter, if a conventional bomb kills a child, that child is just as dead.

Oh ok, so you don't believe in all the international agreements and laws banning chemical weapons then.

So the point had nothing to do with the children that were gassed (as Trump apparently lied about), it was about punishing the perpetrator? And we did that by not hitting the gas or preventing any more air-raids?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

A coward
A democrat
Obama
All of the above

Obama's 'red line' failure assured crisis in Syria

Syrian rebels with a racist message. This should please the KKK.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

How long do you think it will be before Assad uses them again?

White House claims on Syria chemical attack ‘obviously false’ – MIT professor

A professor who challenged the 2013 claims of a chemical attack in Syria is now questioning the Trump administration’s narrative blaming the Assad government for the April 4 attack in the Idlib province town of Khan Shaykhun.
On Tuesday, the White House released a declassified intelligence brief accusing Syrian President Bashar Assad of ordering and organizing the attack, in which Syrian planes allegedly dropped chemical ordnance on civilians in the rebel-held town.

The report “contains absolutely no evidence that this attack was the result of a munition being dropped from an aircraft,” wrote Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Professor Theodore Postol, who reviewed it and put together a 14-page assessment, which he provided to RT on Wednesday.