bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
who takes care of those who cant make it on their own?
That's what charity is all about. I know the concept is alien to libtards like you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who takes care of those who cant make it on their own?
Income inequality helps explain our savings deficiency which will tie directly to our statist/corporatist policies.
This is another good discussion that rw kooks can challenge me on.
What does any of the have to do with politicians promising far more than we can pay for?
I don't have a problem living within my means. I also Pay my bills, and I don't take a pay cut when I know I have to make my car payment etc.
Cutting spending isn't taking a pay cut.
Nor does incurring more debt help get you out of debt
Interest never sleeps nor sickens nor dies; it never goes to the hospital; it works on Sundays and holidays; it never takes a vacation. Once in debt, interest is your companion every minute of the day and night; you cannot shun it or slip away from it; you cannot dismiss it; it yields neither to entreaties, demands, or orders; and whenever you get in its way or cross its course or fail to meet its demands, it crushes you. (J Reuben Clark Jr)
who takes care of those who cant make it on their own?
when in history has this need been completely filled by charity?
when in history has this need been completely filled by charity?
Before the existence of welfare, charity is all we had. No one starved.
who takes care of those who cant make it on their own?
No one is stopping all those compassionate libs from writing the needy a check.
when in history has this need been completely filled by charity?
Before the existence of welfare, charity is all we had. No one starved.
At what point is charity evil?
Is charity always good?
If charity is good than we the people can all decide to vote in a lump sum to charity and its fine huh?
Can you go get proof no one starved?
At what point is charity evil?
Is charity always good?
If charity is good than we the people can all decide to vote in a lump sum to charity and its fine huh?
Charity is never evil. However, taking money at gunpoint is not "charity." That's what distinguishes charity from welfare: the latter is collected at gunpoint. The former is purely voluntary.
You don't "vote" for charity. Everything the government does is enforced at gunpoint.
The irony is the welfare system has worked so well that silly little boys like the poster actually think its impossible for someone to starve to death
Can you go get proof no one starved?
Can you find proof that anyone did?
The rules of logic do not require me to prove a negative.
Charity is never evil. However, taking money at gunpoint is not "charity." That's what distinguishes charity from welfare: the latter is collected at gunpoint. The former is purely voluntary.
You don't "vote" for charity. Everything the government does is enforced at gunpoint.