i saw a couple of posts on the child endangerment issue.....it would be curtailing the religous freedoms...
follow me on this....
jw's dont allow blood....preferring their child to die in the grace of god...than to risk taking blood and not entering paradise (this is the way i understand it)...is that a child endangerment issue?
I think that's scientologists, isn't it? But there's a difference between a sincere religious tenet against blood transfusion or certain modern medical practices and hauling your kids out into a fracas you, yourself are inviting. That would be like taking your kids to a dive bar on a Saturday night, standing behind them and starting a brawl as far as I'm concerned.
Seriously, there are people who don't stick to peaceful counter protest and throw rocks or take other actions at these things - and "rumors" of worse if the freaks are caught out in the open and away from the spotlight. Subjecting your kids to that stuff is pure endangerment as far as I'm concerned.
no its jw's....scientologists dont believe in meds or doctors..they think they can be cleansed ...there is a word for it....of the angry souls that inhabit their bodies...
One belief of Scientology is that a human is an immortal alien spiritual being, termed a thetan, that is trapped on planet Earth in a physical body. Hubbard described these "thetans" in "Space Opera" cosmogony. The thetan has had innumerable past lives and it is accepted in Scientology that lives preceding the thetan's arrival on Earth lived in extraterrestrial cultures. Descriptions of space opera incidents are seen as true events by Scientologists.[2]
Scientology beliefs and practices - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I get those groups confused.
I know Scientologists are not JW's, but my mind sort of lumps them together. At any rate, big difference between their actual religious teachings strange as they may seem and hauling a kid deliberately into an ugly, potentially dangerous situation. Especially when you're doing it to hide behind them.