kwc57
BOHICA Obama
Well I guess Killing Americans with due process is OK
We do it all the time.
We call it the death penalty.
I see the view up your ass hasn't changed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I guess Killing Americans with due process is OK
We do it all the time.
We call it the death penalty.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the government’s targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include “signature strikes” in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on “patterns” of behavior that have never been made public.
He was not the target of the strike. No matter how many time you claim he was.
My proof is that he was killed, what is your proof that he was not targeted?
It is upon the claimant to prove their claim, not the skeptic to prove the negative.
Nice try.
Prove the boy was targeted for death by the US government, please.
Thank you.
My proof is that he was killed, what is your proof that he was not targeted?
It is upon the claimant to prove their claim, not the skeptic to prove the negative.
Nice try.
Prove the boy was targeted for death by the US government, please.
Thank you.
Ok, well this link says he was on a "kill list"
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the governments targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
From your own link:
According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include signature strikes in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on patterns of behavior that have never been made public.
A clear admission by the ACLU that the US government did not know a 16 year old US citizen was in the target group in an overseas military operating theater.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the governments targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
From your own link:
According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include signature strikes in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on patterns of behavior that have never been made public.
A clear admission by the ACLU that the US government did not know a 16 year old US citizen was in the target group in an overseas military operating theater.
It is upon the claimant to prove their claim, not the skeptic to prove the negative.
Nice try.
Prove the boy was targeted for death by the US government, please.
Thank you.
Ok, well this link says he was on a "kill list"
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
Jesus. Read your own link, dumbass. His FATHER was on the kill list. Did all the Muslim names get you confused?
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the governments targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
From your own link:
According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include signature strikes in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on patterns of behavior that have never been made public.
A clear admission by the ACLU that the US government did not know a 16 year old US citizen was in the target group in an overseas military operating theater.
Oh I see what you are doing, you are believing what the administration fed you and are saying that the 16 year old boy and his cousins were not intentionally murdered it was manslaughter. Ok we'll go with that.
I've called you out for claiming that he was targeted every time I see you do it. I've pointed out to you numerous times that the President is authorized to conduct the campaign against al Qaeda as he sees fit.
Guns/missiles/arrows usually hit their target. I guess what you are saying is that you believe what the administration tells you and it makes some sort of difference to the 16 year old boy that he wasn't the target. Plus apparently your argument is that all brown skinned people are terrorist thus open for attack.
Ok, well this link says he was on a "kill list"
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
Jesus. Read your own link, dumbass. His FATHER was on the kill list. Did all the Muslim names get you confused?
It's not "my link" it was linked with the original post.
But yes, the names did confuse me. I apologize profusely for my grievous error.
Maybe if you call me a few more names, it'll clear things right up.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the government’s targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
From your own link:
According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include “signature strikes” in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on “patterns” of behavior that have never been made public.
A clear admission by the ACLU that the US government did not know a 16 year old US citizen was in the target group in an overseas military operating theater.
Includes means, includes. Which obviously means there is another method of targeting. You need to read up on how drones are targeting. And if we are killing people on "patterns" I have to ask, what the f..k is wrong with us?
Jesus. Read your own link, dumbass. His FATHER was on the kill list. Did all the Muslim names get you confused?
It's not "my link" it was linked with the original post.
But yes, the names did confuse me. I apologize profusely for my grievous error.
Maybe if you call me a few more names, it'll clear things right up.
don't feel bad, the list is secret and the Obama administration is not being free with the information of whom is on the list. They say he wasn't but his death indicates otherwise. Or else the system is flawed and he was killed by accident.
Point being - no one really knows whether he was targeted or not.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit in 2012 challenging the governments targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone. Oral argument was held in July 2013 in Washington, and the court dismissed the case in April 2014.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/al-aulaqi-v-panetta
So if Jeb Bush gets elected president then he pretty much can kill anyone he wants as long as the CIA says they are a threat. Interesting.
Point being - no one really knows whether he was targeted or not.
Point being - those claiming he was are speaking out of their asses. There is not a shred of evidence to support that claim. Not even the ACLU makes that claim.
It isn't like this kid was killed while sightseeing at the top of the World Trade Center.