We need...........

[LoneLaugher]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

 

[bucs90]

My question is.........why is Ann Romney's "financial security" something worthy of an "ATTACK"????

Since when did "financial security" become an evil thing? Isn't that what we are all working towards? Wouldn't we all want that?

But, to be fair, I'm sure the Obamas are gonna send their daughters packing at age 18 with NO help from their famous, millionaire parents in 10 years.......RIGHT?

 

[SniperFire]

We need.... fewer fake headline new threads.

 

[buckeye45_73]

HAHA nice one troll. My question is why do you care if Anne Romeny stays at home? Who gives a shit? I love when liberals have nothing and they go back to bashing republican women, so are you saying Palin was ok to go to work, because alot of democrats thought she should have stayed at home, it's so confusing when you guys change your positions, no wonder you dumbasses dont win any arguements.

 

[Liability]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

The comments were not directed at her financial security, dopey.

And the comments WERE part of the divide and conquer approach favored by liberal Democratics.

Can you say "back fire?"

Now stop your whining, suck it up and distance yourselves from the idiotic effort.

Go!

 

[Full-Auto]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

You havent had enough yet.

We will let you know.

This should be good for up to two weeks, Liberals have taught us beating a dead horse keeps the fringers in attack mode. So man up.

 

[WillowTree]

My question is.........why is Ann Romney's "financial security" something worthy of an "ATTACK"????

Since when did "financial security" become an evil thing? Isn't that what we are all working towards? Wouldn't we all want that?

But, to be fair, I'm sure the Obamas are gonna send their daughters packing at age 18 with NO help from their famous, millionaire parents in 10 years.......RIGHT?

that's a damn good question,, bet he doesn't have a damn good answer..

 

[LordBrownTrout]

O is there.........as long as it's not about debt, economics, unemployment, jobs, energy.

 

[Rocko]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Speak english, retard. What the hell are you complaining about?

 

[Liability]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Speak english, retard. What the hell are you complaining about?

LonelyLaughable is attempting to complain about how he lacks the capacity to compose a simple declarative English sentence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Michelle is much cooler than Ann.
She made $300,000 a year from the University of Chicago Hospitals while she stayed home.

 

[Valerie]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Why don't you go send a tweet on it, you twit!


No one asked a snarky dembot leader to scoff at Ann Romney's work history...

That dembot twit was looking at the gender gap polls and thinking how Ann Romney's image needs to be tarnished because they are afraid that gap is going to close when America falls in love with sweet and beautiful Ann Romney. She is a threat.

So that dembot twit flippantly flung shit at Ann Romney on purpose..I absolutely love that it's coming back in her own face, she deserves it...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Perhaps you moonbats should stop attacking women and minorities....


Deal?

 

[uscitizen]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

The comments were not directed at her financial security, dopey.

And the comments WERE part of the divide and conquer approach favored by liberal Democratics.

Can you say "back fire?"

Now stop your whining, suck it up and distance yourselves from the idiotic effort.

Go!

the divide and conquer democrats?

Anyone else remember the "if you are not with us you are for the enemy"?
It is unpatriotic to attack the president during a time of war?

Republicans the projectionist party.

 

[The T]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

Perhaps you moonbats should stop attacking women and minorities....


Deal?

And release them OFF the Statist Plantation to think for themselves?

 

[bucs90]

Wow. I see liberals sat this one out.

 

[Liability]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

The comments were not directed at her financial security, dopey.

And the comments WERE part of the divide and conquer approach favored by liberal Democratics.

Can you say "back fire?"

Now stop your whining, suck it up and distance yourselves from the idiotic effort.

Go!

the divide and conquer democrats?

Anyone else remember the "if you are not with us you are for the enemy"?
It is unpatriotic to attack the president during a time of war?

Republicans the projectionist party.

No. I don't remember THAT.

And neither do you.

You are conflating different things said back then.

It's like when Tina Fey parodied Sarah Palin and a bunch of you nitwits thought that Sarah Palin actually SAID some of the lines offered by Tina.

You guys tend not to be very bright.

 

[The T]

.......more fake outrage over comments directed at Ann Romney's financial security which nutters have seized on as an attack on stay at home moms.

Maybe you dummies can make this lie stick? Give it your best shot.

What YOU have done is unmask the entire premise of the attack...using Ann Romney to get at her husband in the O's war on prosperity...Class Warfare, Wealth envy, becuase he cannot run on his record.

You idiots are so fucking transparent.

*Congratulations*

 

[Seawytch]

The comments were not directed at her financial security, dopey.

And the comments WERE part of the divide and conquer approach favored by liberal Democratics.

Can you say "back fire?"

Now stop your whining, suck it up and distance yourselves from the idiotic effort.

Go!

the divide and conquer democrats?

Anyone else remember the "if you are not with us you are for the enemy"?
It is unpatriotic to attack the president during a time of war?

Republicans the projectionist party.

No. I don't remember THAT.

And neither do you.

You are conflating different things said back then.

It's like when Tina Fey parodied Sarah Palin and a bunch of you nitwits thought that Sarah Palin actually SAID some of the lines offered by Tina.

You guys tend not to be very bright.

Will video help your memory?

 

[uscitizen]

The comments were not directed at her financial security, dopey.

And the comments WERE part of the divide and conquer approach favored by liberal Democratics.

Can you say "back fire?"

Now stop your whining, suck it up and distance yourselves from the idiotic effort.

Go!

the divide and conquer democrats?

Anyone else remember the "if you are not with us you are for the enemy"?
It is unpatriotic to attack the president during a time of war?

Republicans the projectionist party.

No. I don't remember THAT.

And neither do you.

You are conflating different things said back then.

It's like when Tina Fey parodied Sarah Palin and a bunch of you nitwits thought that Sarah Palin actually SAID some of the lines offered by Tina.

You guys tend not to be very bright.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-23kmhc3P8U]With Us or Against Us - YouTube[/ame]