We finally know what the GOP will do for the next two years and it’s hilarious

[teapartysamurai]

So how many job were lost during President Bushes final year in office again?

You want to see?

US Unemployment Rate by Year

2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26

The United States Unemployment Rate By Year

Look at when it jumped big time. UNDER OBAMA!

Yeah, it's all Bush. Keep running with that liberals. Tuesday is coming!

I did say final year didn't I? Here you go.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six decades.

A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit crisis began in September.

The unemployment rate rose to 7.2% last month from 6.7% in November - its highest rate since January 1993.

The steep annual drop in jobs marked the highest yearly job-loss total since 1945, the year in which World War II ended.

Total 2008 job loss: 2.6 million - Jan. 9, 2009

That was 2.6 million job lost in the last year of the Bush Presidency.

But Barack had already won the presidency so of course the rabid righties have to blame him.

Yeah, that explains the total year being 5.76, whereas the NEXT year is almost TWICE THAT.

Yeah keep this up liberals. Wonder why the country isn't voting Democrats. Oooooooooooooo, let me think.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Quite a bit of it around here in my neck of the woods, unfortunately, does do with the fact the President is bi-racial. That's unfortunate some fools still feel that way, and is what it is. It's ironic that some Democratic minorities play the race card, too; it is ironic on how they were so well schooled in it.

No one denies that racists exist, Jake. What some of us take issue with, and I believe we have a legitimate issue, is that everyone who does not march lockstep with Obama's presidency, is labeled a racist. That is not acceptable. It is the easy answer but it is no the correct answer. It's like being taking a math test and putting any answer down, without bothering to work out the right answer.

I think both sides are reponsible for this. The use of the words "liberal" and "racist" are often mindless counterpunches by one side or the other. Those who are neither certainly resent being hit by the words if they do not apply.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Whereas almost 4,000,000 had lost their jobs by the time BHO became president.

Stay sane with your figures, TPS.

 

[Harry Dresden]

You embarrass your side every time you open your mouth.

so does Dean.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

110th Congress (2007-2009)

Majority Party: Democrat (49 seats)

Minority Party: Republican (49 seats)

Other Parties: 1Independent; 1 Independent Democrat

Total Seats: 100

Note:Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut was reelected in 2006 as an independent candidate, and became an Independent Democrat. Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont was elected as an Independent.

these are links?.....

If Democrats had such "control" over the senate, then how come they only had 49 votes out of a hundred? What the fuck is it you want. It couldn't be more clear. Duh!

You need a link? Yea Mr. Geico, you are certainly missing a link.

you dishonest fuck....you know dam well those have nothing to do with what i was talking about.....answer post 51 asshole.....SHOW ME THOSE FUCKING LINKS!....

 

[editec]

FAr as I can tell based on what the GOP has been against?

Their plan for the economy is more of the same that got us into this mess to begin with.

Doesn't seem like a very good plan to me.

And, FWIW, I don't see much on the Democratic slate that inspires much confidence, either.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Year Executive branch civilians (thousands) Uniformed military personnel (thousands) Legislative and judicial branch personnel (thousands) Total Federal personnel (thousands)
1962 2,485 2,840 30 5,354
1963 2 2,498 2,732 30 5,260
1964 2 2,470 2,719 31 5,220
1965 2,496 2,687 32 5,215
1966 2,726 3,129 33 5,888
1967 2,968 3,413 34 6,416
1968 3,020 3,584 35 6,639
1969 3 3,040 3,499 36 6,575
1970 4 2,944 3,104 38 6,085
1971 4 2,883 2,752 40 5,675
1972 2,823 2,360 42 5,225
1973 2,781 2,289 44 5,113
1974 2,847 2,198 46 5,091
1975 2,848 2,164 49 5,061
1976 2,833 2,119 50 5,002
1977 2,840 2,112 53 5,005
1978 2,875 2,099 55 5,028
1979 2,823 2,063 53 4,939
1980 4 2,821 2,090 55 4,965
1981 4 2,806 2,122 54 4,982
1982 2,770 2,147 55 4,972
1983 2,820 2,163 56 5,039
1984 2,854 2,178 56 5,088
1985 3,008 2,190 58 5,256
1986 2,966 2,206 55 5,228
1987 3,030 2,213 58 5,301
1988 3,054 2,176 59 5,289
1989 3,064 2,168 60 5,292
1990 4 3,067 2,106 61 5,234
1991 4 3,048 2,040 64 5,152
1992 3,017 1,848 66 4,931
1993 2,947 1,744 66 4,758
1994 2,908 1,648 63 4,620
1995 2,858 1,555 62 4,475
1996 2,786 1,507 61 4,354
1997 2,725 1,439 62 4,226
1998 2,727 1,407 62 4,196
1999 2,687 1,386 63 4,135
2000 4 2,639 1,426 63 4,129
2001 4 2,640 1,428 64 4,132
2002 2,630 1,456 66 4,152
2003 2,666 1,478 65 4,210
2004 2,650 1,473 64 4,187
2005 2,636 1,436 65 4,138
2006 2,637 1,432 63 4,133
2007 2,636 1,427 63 4,127
2008 2,692 1,450 64 4,206
2009 2,774 1,591 66 4,430
Total Government Employment Since 1962

Seems as though Bush added about 100,000 in 8 years (roughly)
Obama has added 200,000 in his first year.

 

[rdean]

You want to see?

US Unemployment Rate by Year

2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26

The United States Unemployment Rate By Year

Look at when it jumped big time. UNDER OBAMA!

Yeah, it's all Bush. Keep running with that liberals. Tuesday is coming!

I did say final year didn't I? Here you go.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six decades.

A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit crisis began in September.

The unemployment rate rose to 7.2% last month from 6.7% in November - its highest rate since January 1993.

The steep annual drop in jobs marked the highest yearly job-loss total since 1945, the year in which World War II ended.

Total 2008 job loss: 2.6 million - Jan. 9, 2009

That was 2.6 million job lost in the last year of the Bush Presidency.

But Barack had already won the presidency so of course the rabid righties have to blame him.

Yeah, that explains the total year being 5.76, whereas the NEXT year is almost TWICE THAT.

Yeah keep this up liberals. Wonder why the country isn't voting Democrats. Oooooooooooooo, let me think.

Gawd you're dumb. Is that an act. When Bush left office, the US was losing jobs at the rate of 750,000 a month. What was Obama supposed to do? A presidential act outlawing unemployment?

Dumb as dumb can be.

 

[rdean]

these are links?.....

If Democrats had such "control" over the senate, then how come they only had 49 votes out of a hundred? What the fuck is it you want. It couldn't be more clear. Duh!

You need a link? Yea Mr. Geico, you are certainly missing a link.

you dishonest fuck....you know dam well those have nothing to do with what i was talking about.....answer post 51 asshole.....SHOW ME THOSE FUCKING LINKS!....

FROM 51:

The Republicans have stated their goal is to make Obama a one term president. Nothing for the Middle Class. Nothing to improve the economy. The leadership spits on their base and moons the US. That's just the way it is. People here calls me names, but no one disputes my facts. Because they can't.


I posted the link where Mitch McConnell said the goal of the Republican Party is to make Obama a one term president. Not that I had to. It's been all over the news.

The reason I can't post links showing the Republican Party isn't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy, is, now get this, because they aren't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy. Can you finally get it?

If Republicans were helping the middle class, there would be links. But since they aren't, of course there are no links. If you have one, dipshit, post it. I want to see it.

Does everything have to be explained?

 

[skookerasbil]

I did say final year didn't I? Here you go.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six decades.

A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit crisis began in September.

The unemployment rate rose to 7.2% last month from 6.7% in November - its highest rate since January 1993.

The steep annual drop in jobs marked the highest yearly job-loss total since 1945, the year in which World War II ended.

Total 2008 job loss: 2.6 million - Jan. 9, 2009

That was 2.6 million job lost in the last year of the Bush Presidency.

But Barack had already won the presidency so of course the rabid righties have to blame him.

Yeah, that explains the total year being 5.76, whereas the NEXT year is almost TWICE THAT.

Yeah keep this up liberals. Wonder why the country isn't voting Democrats. Oooooooooooooo, let me think.

Gawd you're dumb. Is that an act. When Bush left office, the US was losing jobs at the rate of 750,000 a month. What was Obama supposed to do? A presidential act outlawing unemployment?

Dumb as dumb can be.

Hey...........the dummies are going to be laughing their asses off in about 4 days!!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[skookerasbil]

If Democrats had such "control" over the senate, then how come they only had 49 votes out of a hundred? What the fuck is it you want. It couldn't be more clear. Duh!

You need a link? Yea Mr. Geico, you are certainly missing a link.

you dishonest fuck....you know dam well those have nothing to do with what i was talking about.....answer post 51 asshole.....SHOW ME THOSE FUCKING LINKS!....

FROM 51:

The Republicans have stated their goal is to make Obama a one term president. Nothing for the Middle Class. Nothing to improve the economy. The leadership spits on their base and moons the US. That's just the way it is. People here calls me names, but no one disputes my facts. Because they can't.


I posted the link where Mitch McConnell said the goal of the Republican Party is to make Obama a one term president. Not that I had to. It's been all over the news.

The reason I can't post links showing the Republican Party isn't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy, is, now get this, because they aren't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy. Can you finally get it?

If Republicans were helping the middle class, there would be links. But since they aren't, of course there are no links. If you have one, dipshit, post it. I want to see it.

Does everything have to be explained?

somehow......Dean missed the memo about people doing the same thing over and over and over and over and expecting a different outcome!!!!!

Have a blast on election night!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The GOP is going to take the House by ten to a dozen seats, and the fauxright thinks that is a super majority victory. As if that will change anything. Get a life, reactionaries.

 

[skookerasbil]

The GOP is going to take the House by ten to a dozen seats, and the fauxright thinks that is a super majority victory. As if that will change anything. Get a life, reactionaries.

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[JakeStarkey]

Celebrate a GOP House victory. That is so much less than what you fauxconservatives of the far reactionary right were preaching for the last year and a half.

 

[rdean]

Yeah, that explains the total year being 5.76, whereas the NEXT year is almost TWICE THAT.

Yeah keep this up liberals. Wonder why the country isn't voting Democrats. Oooooooooooooo, let me think.

Gawd you're dumb. Is that an act. When Bush left office, the US was losing jobs at the rate of 750,000 a month. What was Obama supposed to do? A presidential act outlawing unemployment?

Dumb as dumb can be.

Hey...........the dummies are going to be laughing their asses off in about 4 days!!!!

Then what?

 

[Harry Dresden]

FROM 51:

The Republicans have stated their goal is to make Obama a one term president. Nothing for the Middle Class. Nothing to improve the economy. The leadership spits on their base and moons the US. That's just the way it is. People here calls me names, but no one disputes my facts. Because they can't.


I posted the link where Mitch McConnell said the goal of the Republican Party is to make Obama a one term president. Not that I had to. It's been all over the news.

The reason I can't post links showing the Republican Party isn't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy, is, now get this, because they aren't helping the middle class or working to improve the economy. Can you finally get it?

If Republicans were helping the middle class, there would be links. But since they aren't, of course there are no links. If you have one, dipshit, post it. I want to see it.

Does everything have to be explained?

this is the answer to post 51?.....some other guys 51,not mine....here is post 51 from me Dean.....

..(now where are those links i asked you for in that other thread where you danced away like a champion ballroom dancer?.....you know the links backing up your accusations that ALL republicans or Conservatives disregard science......the link showing how ALL Repubs. and Cons. hate gays....how about the one showing where they ALL hate blacks and Hispanics......and Remember Dean ....a lot of posters here know you and what you are....being dishonest like you usually are will not work here....lets see those links)

what you said has got nothing to do with what i was asking about.....wanna try again?.....or are we going to dance again?....