Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'd rather be ruled by the Shah then Ariel Sharon.
Ha! I'm not sure you would say that if you were Kurdish...or a democrat.
What is the operating time for your escort service for Arabs? Don't you have any clients today?
I'd rather be ruled by the Shah then Ariel Sharon.
Ha! I'm not sure you would say that if you were Kurdish...or a democrat.
Under the Shah they had only one choice to vote for. In the US, we have a choice of 2 guys who are pretty much both exactly the same. Not much diff to tell you the truth, but at least in Iran, gas is 12 cents a gallon.
I wouldn't mind being Kurdish, I love bean kurds and cheese kurds.
Ever since the Shah died, the people now call his oldest son Shah (king). A king dies and the prince is now called king by his people. Wow did you need to google and Wikipedia that you fucking incompetent moron? Is your IQ about the same as your shoe size?Wow how many times in one thread can a person be wrong? You truly have no shame do you? The Shah simply means King. When his father died he was elevated from being a prince to a King. But what am I saying, you again know more than the people of Iran who consider him the King.
Prince Reza Pahlavi (Persian: رضا پهلوی*, born 31 October 1960) is the last crown prince of the former...
Reza Pahlavi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There are days when I SWEAR you do this stuff on purpose...
Escort services are primarily hetero sexual. Douchebag.What is the operating time for your escort service for Arabs? Don't you have any clients today?
I've never come across a poster so obsessed with blow jobs and gay sex.
You mention them on damn near every thread.
Is there something you'd like to tell us, Roudy?
I don't know about Kurd, but turd you definitely are.I'd rather be ruled by the Shah then Ariel Sharon.
Ha! I'm not sure you would say that if you were Kurdish...or a democrat.
Under the Shah they had only one choice to vote for. In the US, we have a choice of 2 guys who are pretty much both exactly the same. Not much diff to tell you the truth, but at least in Iran, gas is 12 cents a gallon.
I wouldn't mind being Kurdish, I love bean kurds and cheese kurds.
Escort services are primarily hetero sexual. Douchebag.What is the operating time for your escort service for Arabs? Don't you have any clients today?
I've never come across a poster so obsessed with blow jobs and gay sex.
You mention them on damn near every thread.
Is there something you'd like to tell us, Roudy?
Under the Shah they voted for Prime minister and local officials. But unlike England the Shah had ultimate power.I'd rather be ruled by the Shah then Ariel Sharon.
Ha! I'm not sure you would say that if you were Kurdish...or a democrat.
Under the Shah they had only one choice to vote for. In the US, we have a choice of 2 guys who are pretty much both exactly the same. Not much diff to tell you the truth, but at least in Iran, gas is 12 cents a gallon.
I wouldn't mind being Kurdish, I love bean kurds and cheese kurds.
I cannot tell you how many people under the comments (mostly in Farsi) have written how regretful they are for supporting the revolution and how they would trade life under the shah versus these blood sucking inbred who took over and steered such wonderful country to the 14th century.
Yup, Saigon is right. The mullahs are possibly worse than the previous regime.[/SIZE]
Yes, I'm sure that is true, Amir.
There are stories of how under Hitler, Estonians ran to support the invading Russians, feeling they simply HAD to be better. They weren't, of course.
Under a dictatorship it must often seem like any alternative would be better than that one has and suffers under.
Yes you don't care if the Iranians call him king. It's your opinion and analysis that counts, I understand. Let's not let the facts get in the way. Ha ha ha.Roudy -
He still isn't the king...and I don't care who calls him that.
You know - you could just once in a while admit "Ok, I didn't know that" , or "OK, I got that wrong."
You'd get far more respect for the honesty than you do this insane bluffing.
I cannot tell you how many people under the comments (mostly in Farsi) have written how regretful they are for supporting the revolution and how they would trade life under the shah versus these blood sucking inbred who took over and steered such wonderful country to the 14th century.
Yup, Saigon is right. The mullahs are possibly worse than the previous regime.[/SIZE]
Yes, I'm sure that is true, Amir.
There are stories of how under Hitler, Estonians ran to support the invading Russians, feeling they simply HAD to be better. They weren't, of course.
Under a dictatorship it must often seem like any alternative would be better than that one has and suffers under.
Thank you Saigon for comparing ordinary Iranians with supporters of Hitler.
As I said earlier, Google, Wikipedia or an encyclopedia cannot replace the real knowledge.
Look, here's a person example. My sister, a rebel in the family was against the monarchy, just by nature (and association) even though she never felt any sort of discrimination based on her gender, religion or views.
Fast forward, she traded a nice posh office in Beverly Hills to help the needy after the revolution (as a physician)
One day I got a call from her begging me to get her out of that hell hole. And when I asked what happened, she said a local grocer (or butcher, I don't remember) threatened her while shaking his knife that "if one more time if I see you dressed like this, your ear would be your biggest body part" which is an exaggeration meaning your body would be chopped into small pieces.
Now this was someone who always wore minis, was a feminist and although rebellious and anti shah was never bothered by the SAVAK or anyone related to the regime.
How could you say the mullahrchy is "possibly" worse than life under the shah?
Yes you don't care if the Iranians call him king. It's your opinion and analysis that counts, I understand. Let's not get the facts get in the way. Ha ha ha.Roudy -
He still isn't the king...and I don't care who calls him that.
You know - you could just once in a while admit "Ok, I didn't know that" , or "OK, I got that wrong."
You'd get far more respect for the honesty than you do this insane bluffing.
I cannot tell you how many people under the comments (mostly in Farsi) have written how regretful they are for supporting the revolution and how they would trade life under the shah versus these blood sucking inbred who took over and steered such wonderful country to the 14th century.
Yup, Saigon is right. The mullahs are possibly worse than the previous regime.[/SIZE]
Yes, I'm sure that is true, Amir.
There are stories of how under Hitler, Estonians ran to support the invading Russians, feeling they simply HAD to be better. They weren't, of course.
Under a dictatorship it must often seem like any alternative would be better than that one has and suffers under.
Thank you Saigon for comparing ordinary Iranians with supporters of Hitler.
As I said earlier, Google, Wikipedia or an encyclopedia cannot replace the real knowledge.
Look, here's a person example. My sister, a rebel in the family was against the monarchy, just by nature (and association) even though she never felt any sort of discrimination based on her gender, religion or views.
Fast forward, she traded a nice posh office in Beverly Hills to help the needy after the revolution (as a physician)
One day I got a call from her begging me to get her out of that hell hole. And when I asked what happened, she said a local grocer (or butcher, I don't remember) threatened her while shaking his knife that "if one more time if I see you dressed like this, your ear would be your biggest body part" which is an exaggeration meaning your body would be chopped into small pieces.
Now this was someone who always wore minis, was a feminist and although rebellious and anti shah was never bothered by the SAVAK or anyone related to the regime.
How could you say the mullahrchy is "possibly" worse than life under the shah?
Yes you don't care if the Iranians call him king. It's your opinion and analysis that counts, I understand. Let's not get the facts get in the way. Ha ha ha.Roudy -
He still isn't the king...and I don't care who calls him that.
You know - you could just once in a while admit "Ok, I didn't know that" , or "OK, I got that wrong."
You'd get far more respect for the honesty than you do this insane bluffing.
Yes, I'm sure that is true, Amir.
There are stories of how under Hitler, Estonians ran to support the invading Russians, feeling they simply HAD to be better. They weren't, of course.
Under a dictatorship it must often seem like any alternative would be better than that one has and suffers under.
Thank you Saigon for comparing ordinary Iranians with supporters of Hitler.
As I said earlier, Google, Wikipedia or an encyclopedia cannot replace the real knowledge.
Look, here's a person example. My sister, a rebel in the family was against the monarchy, just by nature (and association) even though she never felt any sort of discrimination based on her gender, religion or views.
Fast forward, she traded a nice posh office in Beverly Hills to help the needy after the revolution (as a physician)
One day I got a call from her begging me to get her out of that hell hole. And when I asked what happened, she said a local grocer (or butcher, I don't remember) threatened her while shaking his knife that "if one more time if I see you dressed like this, your ear would be your biggest body part" which is an exaggeration meaning your body would be chopped into small pieces.
Now this was someone who always wore minis, was a feminist and although rebellious and anti shah was never bothered by the SAVAK or anyone related to the regime.
How could you say the mullahrchy is "possibly" worse than life under the shah?
I compared ordinary Iranians with ordinary Estonians, Amir - not with supporters of Hitler.
I have a trip to Iran coming up, actually, so I am really excited about learning more about the country and culture. I'm planning to go to Qoms, Shiraz, Tehran, and one or two other places, but I haven't gone into much detail yet.
Yes they do. Not in public of course.Yes you don't care if the Iranians call him king. It's your opinion and analysis that counts, I understand. Let's not get the facts get in the way. Ha ha ha.Roudy -
He still isn't the king...and I don't care who calls him that.
You know - you could just once in a while admit "Ok, I didn't know that" , or "OK, I got that wrong."
You'd get far more respect for the honesty than you do this insane bluffing.
The Fact is Iranians in Iran, don't call Him Shah or King
Yes you would you "well traveled" Arab lover you. How much?Escort services are primarily hetero sexual. Douchebag.I've never come across a poster so obsessed with blow jobs and gay sex.
You mention them on damn near every thread.
Is there something you'd like to tell us, Roudy?
I wouldn't know, Roudy - but I am sure you do.
btw, the word is "heterosexual".
You mean like we did in Libya by backing Al Qaida?
Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear.
I never thought I would see the day when Americans would be so blinded and partisan that they'd start backing dictators. But here we see a guy who pparently really misses Qaddaffi....
Yes they do. Not in public of course.Yes you don't care if the Iranians call him king. It's your opinion and analysis that counts, I understand. Let's not get the facts get in the way. Ha ha ha.
The Fact is Iranians in Iran, don't call Him Shah or King
