Was Satan wrong to demand equal rights in heaven?

[Abishai100]

The Federal Freak-Show

In John Milton's incredible work "Paradise Lost"( 1667), we read of a sentimental Satan/Devil who wishes to criticize the myopic authoritarianism of God's dictatorship over an otherwise euphoria-rich Eden.

Does heaven have a hierarchical structure? Is it like governments on Earth today (i.e., European Union)?

When we think about how modern age man celebrates the social heroism of everyday human begins such as Jimmy Hoffa (founder of the incendiary Teamsters), we realize that there is something in human nature that simply wants to deify/magnify material achievement. Does this sort of human activity espouse a Christian God or a God-less socialism?

Maybe politics-controversy Hollywood (USA) movies such as "Syriana" (2005) represent man's questions about divinity frailty.





Paradise Lost

 

[GreatestIam]

The Federal Freak-Show

In John Milton's incredible work "Paradise Lost"( 1667), we read of a sentimental Satan/Devil who wishes to criticize the myopic authoritarianism of God's dictatorship over an otherwise euphoria-rich Eden.

Does heaven have a hierarchical structure? Is it like governments on Earth today (i.e., European Union)?

When we think about how modern age man celebrates the social heroism of everyday human begins such as Jimmy Hoffa (founder of the incendiary Teamsters), we realize that there is something in human nature that simply wants to deify/magnify material achievement. Does this sort of human activity espouse a Christian God or a God-less socialism?

Maybe politics-controversy Hollywood (USA) movies such as "Syriana" (2005) represent man's questions about divinity frailty.





Paradise Lost

View attachment 39720

A good book.

Many better than you and I, If I may include you, have written many things that Christians should have paid attention to if morality was something they sought.

Fact is, I have found few Christians who care about morality. If they did, they would have rejected their genocidal son murdering baby torturer and murderer.

Only their double standard of morality can explain why they follow their satanic God.

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

Lets add Job 41 to this also

Job 41

1
.

I snipped your garbage again as the only worthy quote in Job is Job 2;3 where God complains that Satan moved him to destroy without cause.
Regards
DL

That's not what He said. He said Satan incited Him to destroy Job, but that Job remained faithful. Note that God did NOT destroy Job. In fact, he elevated Job. You DID read the rest of the book, didn't you?

Would you trade your children's lives for a bit of elevation?

Neither would Job, but thanks for showing how your religion has corrupted your morals to the point of thinking a father would do such a vile thing.

Regards
DL

He received back twice what he lost, and more children. Just shows how evil and vapid Satan really is, to attack a man's adult children in that fashion.

At your God's request and instruction.

You ignoring that shows the immoral double standard of morality many Christians develop to forgive their God for the same things that they condemn men for doing.

God has authority and privilege that man does not. If you were to discover a meth lab in your neighbor's house, break down his door, put handcuffs on him and lock him in your basement, you would be rightly condemned. If, however, a policeman does the same thing, locking the neighbor in a jail cell, he is not condemned. Instead, he is praised. Why do you think you have the same rights and responsibilities as God Himself?

Strange that you would forgive God for killing your child just for giving you two more.

That should show the depth of your depravity but you do not see it through your faith blinders.

Regards
DL

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

 

[GreatestIam]

[
DL

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.[/QUOTE]

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

 

[GreatestIam]

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

 

[GreatestIam]

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

You are attempting to sound obtuse, and succeeding. Note that God most emphatically did NOT instruct and request that Satan do those things to Job. He ALLOWED Satan to perform the evil Satan begged to do. Very important distinction there.

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

 

[GreatestIam]

Now you ignore Job 2;3 where God says Satan moved him to destroy without cause and thus do evil and sin.

You decide to ignore that and are just turning to plain old lying.

I am done with your lies and satanic morals.

Regards
DL

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

One thing very wrong with your hypothesis, and that is that God didn't destroy Job. Note that Job was doing quite well until God allowed him to be tested. You really need to read more than just one verse if you want to have a hope of understanding the Scriptures.

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Was Satan wrong to demand equal rights in heaven?


Heaven, from what we can speculate, seems to be a system that some would call a tyranny as no one was allowed to question anything or ask for change in leadership or policies.


Was Satan and the third of angels who rejected tyranny wrong to demand equal rights, and if so, are all people who demand equal rights on earth also doing something satanic?


Is this why most religions are reluctant to give women and gays equality? Do Christians and Muslims think equality to be evil and satanic?


Do religious people think that their Gods frown on the notions of equality of all people and is that why believers deny women and gays equality?


Regards

DL

Are the cockroaches your equal in your home? Do you give the rats equal access to your food?

Moronic post is moronic.

 

[GreatestIam]

It does not matter what God destroyed without cause, like Job's innocent children, the fact that God admits to being moved to do evil and sin is the important part of the Job myth.

If religion is supposed to be all about morals. Christianity shows that they are a lot less than moral and Islam is right there with them as they too are homophobic and misogynous.

Both religions follow a demiurge.

Regards
DL

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

Except that God didn't do anything to Job. Satan did. God allowed him some leeway to do some things, but restricted what he could do. Thus God dominated Satan the entire time, and Satan failed, again.

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

 

[GreatestIam]

If God dominated Satan then he is directly culpable for what happened and that make the quote of his admitting guilt exact and his own confession.

Would you arrest a hit man and let the guy that hired and paid him to kill off the hook?

I did not think so.

So why would you let God off the hook?

Why have your immoral double standard?

Regards
DL

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

Your obtuseness is coming through again. Read the Scriptures. God ALLOWED Satan to do what Satan always does, try to destroy. What He did NOT, however, allow was for Satan to succeed in destroying. You really need to read the rest of the story.

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

He was protected from the ultimate evil Satan wished to bring him. God allowed only so much, and no more. Satan was powerless to exceed what God allowed, and Job was blessed for his faithfulness. I mean, this is all very easily understood if you actually read the story.

 

[GreatestIam]

An moral person knows that for someone to just sit back and watch a crime or encourage it is just as culpable as the perpetrator.

Go read a law book as you are just showing your own satanic morals.

I am done with you unless you have something other than denial of common sense and justice.

Regards
DL

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

He was protected from the ultimate evil Satan wished to bring him. God allowed only so much, and no more. Satan was powerless to exceed what God allowed, and Job was blessed for his faithfulness. I mean, this is all very easily understood if you actually read the story.

I have read it and understood it better than you have.

So now you have modified your statement.

So now you recognize that God did not protect him from all evil.

On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most vile, what level of evil is allowable to God before you yell foul and is that the same level you would allow a man before yelling foul?

If a man just allowed another man to kill your children, would that be moral of that first man as well as the second?

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

Again with trying to apply man's standards to God. Simply amazing that you cannot conceive of a higher authority than yourself. God protected Job and only allowed a certain level of testing. That is the perspective you missed.

Let's see how long you remain done with me when I state categorically that God is to be worshiped, holy, righteous and just, full of mercy and slow to anger.

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

He was protected from the ultimate evil Satan wished to bring him. God allowed only so much, and no more. Satan was powerless to exceed what God allowed, and Job was blessed for his faithfulness. I mean, this is all very easily understood if you actually read the story.

I have read it and understood it better than you have.

So now you have modified your statement.

So now you recognize that God did not protect him from all evil.

I didn't say that God protected Job from all evil. I said God limited Satan's ability to do evil to Job, and Satan was powerless to exceed God's limits. Big difference.

On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most vile, what level of evil is allowable to God before you yell foul and is that the same level you would allow a man before yelling foul?

If a man just allowed another man to kill your children, would that be moral of that first man as well as the second?

Regards
DL

Irrelevant. God is not a man and is not bound by man's limitations. You can no more equate the two than to equate the rights and responsibilities of a Policeman and a civilian.

 

[GreatestIam]

How is God allowing the murder of Job's children and family protecting Job?

If you had a Don in your home that just paid a hit man to kill your children and family, would you think yourself well protected as your family dies around you?

Does your personal protection mean so much to you that you would not die for your wife and children?

Regards
DL

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

He was protected from the ultimate evil Satan wished to bring him. God allowed only so much, and no more. Satan was powerless to exceed what God allowed, and Job was blessed for his faithfulness. I mean, this is all very easily understood if you actually read the story.

I have read it and understood it better than you have.

So now you have modified your statement.

So now you recognize that God did not protect him from all evil.

I didn't say that God protected Job from all evil. I said God limited Satan's ability to do evil to Job, and Satan was powerless to exceed God's limits. Big difference.

On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most vile, what level of evil is allowable to God before you yell foul and is that the same level you would allow a man before yelling foul?

If a man just allowed another man to kill your children, would that be moral of that first man as well as the second?

Regards
DL

Irrelevant. God is not a man and is not bound by man's limitations. You can no more equate the two than to equate the rights and responsibilities of a Policeman and a civilian.

So your God has no limit to the evil that you will forgive thus showing how your religion has corrupted your morals.

You may as well call your God Satan.

Regards
DL

 

[hadit]

I thought you were done with me. Guess not.

The answer, of course, is that Satan was allowed only to cause Job great suffering, but was not able to end his life. That was protecting Job.

So to you, Job was not harmed by what God allowed. Right?

There is no harm to a man who loses his children. Right?

Job was protected from that harm and did not care. Right

Regards
DL

He was protected from the ultimate evil Satan wished to bring him. God allowed only so much, and no more. Satan was powerless to exceed what God allowed, and Job was blessed for his faithfulness. I mean, this is all very easily understood if you actually read the story.

I have read it and understood it better than you have.

So now you have modified your statement.

So now you recognize that God did not protect him from all evil.

I didn't say that God protected Job from all evil. I said God limited Satan's ability to do evil to Job, and Satan was powerless to exceed God's limits. Big difference.

On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most vile, what level of evil is allowable to God before you yell foul and is that the same level you would allow a man before yelling foul?

If a man just allowed another man to kill your children, would that be moral of that first man as well as the second?

Regards
DL

Irrelevant. God is not a man and is not bound by man's limitations. You can no more equate the two than to equate the rights and responsibilities of a Policeman and a civilian.

So your God has no limit to the evil that you will forgive thus showing how your religion has corrupted your morals.

You may as well call your God Satan.

Regards
DL

Why? Satan is evil and can only commit evil. God is holy and can only be holy. You seem to be quite confused, accusing God of evil when He has done nothing evil. He thus requires no forgiveness, rendering your main complaint quite useless.