- Banned
- #1
in his assessment of the constitution in that it says what the gov't can't do, but not what it can do?
If he is, and that is the case, does it not show that the "leader monkeys" (in our monkey see monkey do world) don't believe the *rules* written specifically for them apply specifically to them- inquiring minds want to know; why should *follower monkeys* follow rules written by those who don't follow rules?
Rules are made to be broken- yet, if a citizen breaks a rule he is punished. When a rule writer breaks a rule he is applauded and granted sainthood status- I don't get it- I can't find in their rules where it says they have the authority to punish citizens for breaking their rules, (not to mention the granting of sainthood to one of their own)- can someone point out, specifically, where that comes from?
If he is, and that is the case, does it not show that the "leader monkeys" (in our monkey see monkey do world) don't believe the *rules* written specifically for them apply specifically to them- inquiring minds want to know; why should *follower monkeys* follow rules written by those who don't follow rules?
Rules are made to be broken- yet, if a citizen breaks a rule he is punished. When a rule writer breaks a rule he is applauded and granted sainthood status- I don't get it- I can't find in their rules where it says they have the authority to punish citizens for breaking their rules, (not to mention the granting of sainthood to one of their own)- can someone point out, specifically, where that comes from?