- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,856
- 4,783
- 265
Actually I'm pointing out a fallacy in the current investigation.Poor example on your partHmmmm.Apples and oranges.
In the Russian Collusion investigation the absence of evidence only means the investigation must continue.
In this case, the absence of evidence means that there can be only one conclusion. No further investigation needed.
There is plenty of evidence warranting an investigation of Russian Collusion
Key Trump aids meeting with Russian agents, curious financial dealings with Russia, statements Trump made defending Russia
OK your turn
What evidence do you have to support a decision that Oswald had help
None, thus we must continue the investigation forever until we find something.
Some Russian that the Hillary campaign paid to establish contact with Trump officials talks to a couple of people and this is evidence of Collusion?
What it does establish is evidence of several attempts by a political opponent to conduct espionage.
Comparing Trump collusion with JFK is not valid it is apples and oranges. I agree there is no evidence of collusion and the investigation is junk but in the case of JFK they investigated exhaustively and DID find massive evidence.
Your trying for a false equivalency.
Most of the misinformation in the JFK assassination is thanks to kooks, Hollywood, and media speculation. I find it strange how first JFK was killed, 5 years later MLK is assassinated, then 2 months later RFK is assassinated. All of the above were trying to change America, or all the above were tied in with the same people. Why were they killed?
And you are speculating about the answer to why they were killed while ignoring the evidence.
Pointing out a fallacy in the current investigation says nothing about the JFK investigations. You have yet to point out a fallacy in the Warren Commission.