antagon
The Man
- Dec 6, 2009
- 3,572
- 295
- 48
- Thread starter
- #21
there seems to be an association between war and republicans. while republicans are the neoconservatives of the day, i argue that the US government is predisposed to warfare as an obligation to our interests, and that our war policy runs on rails if you will. in that way, i'm not sure if the party or personality at the helm really matters much in terms of if or where. i think how and how it will be perceived is the biggest variable an R or D could contribute.i know you are desperate to to take your simpleton's partisan angle on our history at war, to include the conflicts we're engaged in now.And pray tell who is conducting wars on three fronts presently? Idiot.
one thing idiots like myself have acknowledged, and which escapes great partisan minds like yourself, is that we've stormed into war with bipartisan support since 1812.
this somewhat differs from your previous confabulations that war is associated with Republicans.
Idiot.
i am clearly dissenting the 4 or 5 posts preceding this which characterize republicans as the mongers of war in our government. being an idiot, however, i have no idea how a genius like yourself could confuse those statements which start with 'i argue...', etc. from my assessment of other's opinions.