jillian
Princess
Once again tell me how someone else's net worth affects your net worth.Once again, if the distribution of wealth is not a zero sum game, why do businesses fight so hard against raising the minimum wage, I mean,
according to you people, it's not going to come of their pockets!
If I 'make' a million dollars, I accumulated money from other people. I'm not actually producing cash, I'm acquiring theirs. Therefore, others have collectively lost a million dollars of purchasing power to me.
These people can't go demand new money just because I have all of their money.
They go broke, I get rich, and income inequality is a thing.
Wealth is a Zero-Sum Game
Conservative damagogues like Limbaugh have been able to convince the public that the huge incomes of the wealthiest Americans are irrelevant to those who make moderate-to-low incomes. They even suggest that the more money the wealthiest Americans make, the more wealth will trickle down to the lower classes.
If you've swallowed this line of conservative garbage, get ready to vomit. As all conservative economists know, and deny to the public that they know, wealth is a zero-sum game. That is true at both the front end—when income is divided up, and the back end—when it is spent.
The Front End of Zero-Sum: Dividing the Loot
There is only so much corporate income in a given year.
The Zero-sum Nature of economics
Communists Retards and their parasitic supporters are always using neologisms as a subterfuge to steal from "A" to give to "B".
In the "Communists Manifesto "Their leader Karl Marx described the strategy as follows
"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state…"
.
you should probably study up on what communism is.