Wall Street Declares War on Warren

[georgephillip]

Liz Warren has their number

Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated

She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.

Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate

"Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate.

"She studied it in her previous career as a Harvard professor, and she has effectively built her own think tank inside the Senate, coming up with genuinely novel ideas for how to improve financial regulation.

"What to watch: Warren has already received the grudging respect of many on Wall Street.

"Her diagnoses of where the financial services industry falls short are generally accurate, and her proposed regulations would probably give a competitive advantage to financial giants with large compliance departments."

One analysis I've read claims Wall Street prefers Biden or Mayor Pete, and they think they can leverage Warren to advance Pete.

The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

“…this also points to a bigger issue and challenge that goes beyond the DNC and party politics, the government itself. There’s people who are increasingly losing that faith and trust in the government because they see a lack of transparency there and they see that we don’t have a government that is of, by, and for the people, and really what they see is a small group of really powerful political elites, the establishment, making decisions that serve their interests and maintaining that power while the rest of us are left outside.” Tulsi Gabbard

The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

Tulsi was one of my first two POTUS picks a year ago.
I'm hoping Bernie taps her for his first Secretary of State.

Tulsi Gabbard: ‘Assad is not the enemy of the United States’

Bernie will not get the nomination. If they have to cheat him again to prevent it, they will.

If they can exclude Tulsi but include Pete B and Harris (two clearly unqualified idiots owned by the .1%), they will deny Bernie again.

Plus Bernie is self destructive with his free everything for illegals and funding abortions in Africa.

Bernie will not get the nomination. If they have to cheat him again to prevent it, they will.

If they can exclude Tulsi but include Pete B and Harris (two clearly unqualified idiots owned by the .1%), they will deny Bernie again.

Imho, Biden, Harris, and Pete are the three corporate Dems the Party wants to "choose" between. If they cheat Bernie again, a generation of progressive voters will start looking elsewhere for their candidates. Hopefully, both parties will self-destruct before 2024?

 

[Flash]

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan

Today, Wall Street and US markets in general are simply well-orchestrated wealth transfer mechanisms for the one percent:

Is Corporate Media Tricking the Public with Reports that the Stock Market Is Setting New Highs?

"On January 26, 2018 the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new record high of 26,616.71.

"Despite setting new highs multiple times thereafter, the moves were so negligible on a percentage basis that the reality is that the stock market has been a real dog over the past year and a half.

"This past Friday, the Dow closed at 26,797.46.

"That’s a meager 180.75 points, or less than a one percent move, in 19 months.

"That’s not exactly the stuff that retirement dreams are built on."

What percentage of Americans own stocks?

One thing about Moon Bats. They are always confused about Economics like they are confused about History, Climate Science, Ethics, Biology and the Constitution.

We all benefit from a good equity market. Either directly or indirectly. Wall street is a good thing for all of us, even those of you on welfare. Without the strong economy that is created through capitalism nobody would be able to pay for your welfare check.

It would also be nice to stop being a greedy envious little prick. Just worry about what you make, not what other people make.

Worry more about the cost of government that steals your money and then gives it away to the welfare queens,

 

[wamose]

Pocahontas will no doubt make a peace offering to Wall St, say 100 buffalo pelts, in exchange for favorable press in the future. I'm sure she's making hundreds of promises she'll never keep to the Wall Streeters even as we speak.

 

[georgephillip]

Warren will promise anything she thinks will get her votes but all those promises will go the way of her Indian heritage once she gets what she wants. In other words, she's the exact opposite of Trump where her word is concerned. She's more of a promises made, promises broken candidate. We call that an establishment elitist or a swamper.

Trump's been a gold-plated grifter/con man/psychopathic narcissist for his entire privileged life, and his low-info base thinks he deserves credit for delivering on his racist rants against immigrants.

He deserves prison and worse.

 

[georgephillip]

Pocahontas will no doubt make a peace offering to Wall St, say 100 buffalo pelts, in exchange for favorable press in the future. I'm sure she's making hundreds of promises she'll never keep to the Wall Streeters even as we speak.

Worry more about the bitch in your corner

 

[georgephillip]

The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:

"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement

Re-adjusting your portfolio?

Re-adjusting your portfolio?

SSA or SSI?

 

[georgephillip]

The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:

"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement

This you Georgie?

View attachment 278843

This you Georgie?

Why, are you a racist, too?

 

[georgephillip]

If Pocahontas gets the nomination Wall Street will be lining up to donate to her campaign.

But will she accept?

https://nypost.com/2019/09/11/wall-street-is-freaking-out-at-the-thought-of-president-liz-warren/

 

[georgephillip]

Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths...

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

Most of US productivity gains over the past five decades have gone to the richest 10% of Americans with the richest 1% and 0.1% hogging the lions' share. This has happened regardless of which corporate party controls government, and those at the top always want more.

You might call them sociopaths...

Charles Derber on Our Sociopathic Society - Corporate Crime Reporter

"Sociopathic individuals in the United States are often successful and well adjusted. Most of them are sane and well educated.

"They are more likely to be conforming to the values and rules of conduct of a society than violating them.

"The reason?

"It is the society, it’s rules and values, that are sociopathic."

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

Why is it you and I are better off than most of the world?
Because the US has been the greatest purveyor of violence on this planet since the end of WWII.
How many more innocent human beings have to die in places like Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya with millions more on the chopping block in Africa so you can worship your big screen?

 

[georgephillip]

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.

401k's show the SS is a farce, we all could have invested in our 401k's an additional 12% of our money over 40 years and had a shit full of money.

The government stole from us.

401k's show the SS is a farce, we all could have invested in our 401k's an additional 12% of our money over 40 years and had a shit full of money.

The government stole from us.

Do you trust Wall Street banks and the Federal Reserve more or less than the government that creates your money?

 

[georgephillip]

Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

What of those who get rich from selling the guns?

You should consider the possibility the US is a sociopathic society driven by mass consumerism and deep-seated economic arrangements prioritizing profits over people and leading toward societal self-cannibalization.

so you think we're worse than this in syria?

Why the fk are people coming here then? dude, you can't have it both fking ways. makes you stupid.

Why the fk are people coming here then? dude, you can't have it both fking ways. makes you stupid.

I'm not sufficiently stupid to believe the USA came to dominate the globe by respecting human rights, are you?

 

[Dick Foster]

The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:

"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement

I know why I have a problem with her idiotic plan and if you had half a brain you would too. Or maybe you don't have an IRA or a pot to piss in.

 

[Flash]

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

Why is it you and I are better off than most of the world?
Because the US has been the greatest purveyor of violence on this planet since the end of WWII.
How many more innocent human beings have to die in places like Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya with millions more on the chopping block in Africa so you can worship your big screen?

You mean like when Obama fought the war in Iraq for three years, bombed the shit out of Libya, when they did nothing to us, created ISIS and escalated the war in Iraq? Is that the kind of interventionism you are talking about?

He managed to do all that while at the same time increasing poverty, decreasing family income, destroying health care, running up tremendous debt and having dismal economic growth?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The Wall Street Campaign to Stop Elizabeth Warren Officially Began on September 10, 2019

"Yesterday, that Wall Street campaign officially began. CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber discussed on TV how they are hearing from Wall Street bank executives that Warren must be stopped..."

Can you guess why Wall Street's trolls have a problem with Liz?

Bloomberg Knows:

"On the same day, September 10, 2019, Bloomberg News, which is majority owned by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, whose $52.4 billion net worth derives from leasing his data terminals to thousands of Wall Street trading floors around the globe, ran this headline: 'Richest Could Lose Hundreds of Billions Under Warren’s Wealth Tax.'

"Obviously, that wouldn’t sit too well with Michael Bloomberg, who has frequently penned his own OpEds for his financial news empire..."

"The opinion piece was titled 'Warren’s Assault on Retiree Wealth,' and was written by Phil Gramm and Mike Solon. Gramm is the former Republican Senator whose name appears on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the legislation that repealed the Glass-Steagall Act."

"t was that repeal that allowed Wall Street’s casino investment banks to merge with commercial banks holding Federally-insured deposits.

"And it was this dangerous combo that led to the epic crash on Wall Street in 2008 and the ensuing economic collapse in the U.S. – the greatest collapse since the Great Depression."

There are economic events on the horizon (like negative interest rates) that pose a legitimate threat to savers and retirees; Liz Warren is not among them.

What Negative Interest Rates Mean For Your Retirement

This you Georgie?

View attachment 278843

This you Georgie?

Why, are you a racist, too?

You’re not American as you formed that sentence horribly. LMAO. Exposed.

 

[dudmuck]

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

You are confused.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan.

That asshole Obama was at war everyday of his administration so you can cram your partisan bullshit where the sun don't shine.

Take all your mindless socialist hate and cram it.

Most of the stocks that are traded on Wall Street service pension plans for ordinary working Americans. Like over 70%.

We all want want Wall Street to do well because most of us benefit from it. Everybody that has a job that was funded through equity capital and everybody that has a 401K or pension plan

Today, Wall Street and US markets in general are simply well-orchestrated wealth transfer mechanisms for the one percent:

Is Corporate Media Tricking the Public with Reports that the Stock Market Is Setting New Highs?

"On January 26, 2018 the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new record high of 26,616.71.

"Despite setting new highs multiple times thereafter, the moves were so negligible on a percentage basis that the reality is that the stock market has been a real dog over the past year and a half.

"This past Friday, the Dow closed at 26,797.46.

"That’s a meager 180.75 points, or less than a one percent move, in 19 months.

"That’s not exactly the stuff that retirement dreams are built on."

What percentage of Americans own stocks?

One thing about Moon Bats. They are always confused about Economics like they are confused about History, Climate Science, Ethics, Biology and the Constitution.

We all benefit from a good equity market. Either directly or indirectly. Wall street is a good thing for all of us, even those of you on welfare. Without the strong economy that is created through capitalism nobody would be able to pay for your welfare check.

It would also be nice to stop being a greedy envious little prick. Just worry about what you make, not what other people make.

Worry more about the cost of government that steals your money and then gives it away to the welfare queens,

Most companies are private, and have nothing to do with wall street.
If fact, private companies invest more in their own growth compared to public companies.

 

[jc456]

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

What of those who get rich from selling the guns?

You should consider the possibility the US is a sociopathic society driven by mass consumerism and deep-seated economic arrangements prioritizing profits over people and leading toward societal self-cannibalization.

so you think we're worse than this in syria?

Why the fk are people coming here then? dude, you can't have it both fking ways. makes you stupid.

Why the fk are people coming here then? dude, you can't have it both fking ways. makes you stupid.

I'm not sufficiently stupid to believe the USA came to dominate the globe by respecting human rights, are you?

And yet all these mthr fkrs come here. You should ask yourself that question.

You stay stupid as you are, we love it

 

[Third Party]

Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for.

Good for you, what "free stuff" are you hoping for

Are you sure you want the answer to that loaded question?

A society free of land rents?

Mixed economies and monopoly | Michael Hudson

"The kind of 'mixed economy' envisioned by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill and other classical 19th century free market economists aimed at saving the economy from land rent paid to Europe’s hereditary landlord class.

"Either the government would tax away the land’s rent, or would nationalize it by taking land out of the hands of landlords.

"The idea was to free markets from economic rent ('unearned income') in general, including monopoly rents, and also to subsidize basic needs to create a price-competitive national economy."

Don't worry, Scrooge.
I'll give you a good deal on a used tent and a free patch of sidewalk to camp on

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Everybody is still responsible for themselves

Americans tend to see problems in individual or psychological terms instead of social and structural ones; we see people rather than systems (like capitalism), and we've been taught to believe all behavior reflects free personal choice.

When the next white American male picks up his gun and shoots up the nearest school he will be judged mentally ill, or individually evil, or someone who failed to receive the moral teachings a good society imparts.

It will never occur to most good Americans that it is their sociopathic society that creates the psychological disorders that drive school shooters, here and abroad.

Americans Escaping Gun Violence Flee to Iraq and Syria - The Mideast Beast

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

Does not matter why-both the jerk who shot up El Paso and the shithead illegal who shot Kate Steinle need to be held responsible for their actions.

What of those who get rich from selling the guns?

You should consider the possibility the US is a sociopathic society driven by mass consumerism and deep-seated economic arrangements prioritizing profits over people and leading toward societal self-cannibalization.

The chart shows Obama is the problem

 

[Third Party]

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

Obama screwed up the economy. Under his administration poverty increased, family income decreased, $10 trillion was added to the debt and we had piss poor economic growth. In addition to that taxes were increased and healthcare was screwed up.

If you want to bitch about something bitch about how failed Left policies have screwed the American people.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

Wall Street loves big government. That has been a sugar daddy for them. They proved it when they backed Obama and Clinton.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

Why is it you and I are better off than most of the world?
Because the US has been the greatest purveyor of violence on this planet since the end of WWII.
How many more innocent human beings have to die in places like Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya with millions more on the chopping block in Africa so you can worship your big screen?

So, give yours up.

 

[gipper]

Liz Warren has their number

Unconstrained greed will not be tolerated

She and Bernie seem like the only two possibilities for those disgusted with the last 40 years of neoliberal wealth and income redistribution.

Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate

"Elizabeth Warren understands Wall Street better than any other presidential candidate.

"She studied it in her previous career as a Harvard professor, and she has effectively built her own think tank inside the Senate, coming up with genuinely novel ideas for how to improve financial regulation.

"What to watch: Warren has already received the grudging respect of many on Wall Street.

"Her diagnoses of where the financial services industry falls short are generally accurate, and her proposed regulations would probably give a competitive advantage to financial giants with large compliance departments."

One analysis I've read claims Wall Street prefers Biden or Mayor Pete, and they think they can leverage Warren to advance Pete.

The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

“…this also points to a bigger issue and challenge that goes beyond the DNC and party politics, the government itself. There’s people who are increasingly losing that faith and trust in the government because they see a lack of transparency there and they see that we don’t have a government that is of, by, and for the people, and really what they see is a small group of really powerful political elites, the establishment, making decisions that serve their interests and maintaining that power while the rest of us are left outside.” Tulsi Gabbard

The fix is in just as it was in 2016. The DNC will never allow their candidate bring anything other than controlled by the elite establishment.

This is why Tulsi was excluded. She is the real deal. Can’t have that.

Tulsi was one of my first two POTUS picks a year ago.
I'm hoping Bernie taps her for his first Secretary of State.

Tulsi Gabbard: ‘Assad is not the enemy of the United States’

Bernie will not get the nomination. If they have to cheat him again to prevent it, they will.

If they can exclude Tulsi but include Pete B and Harris (two clearly unqualified idiots owned by the .1%), they will deny Bernie again.

Plus Bernie is self destructive with his free everything for illegals and funding abortions in Africa.

Bernie will not get the nomination. If they have to cheat him again to prevent it, they will.

If they can exclude Tulsi but include Pete B and Harris (two clearly unqualified idiots owned by the .1%), they will deny Bernie again.

Imho, Biden, Harris, and Pete are the three corporate Dems the Party wants to "choose" between. If they cheat Bernie again, a generation of progressive voters will start looking elsewhere for their candidates. Hopefully, both parties will self-destruct before 2024?

I agree. The party does want another corporate nominee, which makes no sense. Hillary is the biggest corporate D ever and she lost to Donnie. The party screwed Bernie supporters who then refused to vote for her. The progressives will not vote for another corporate D, which could give Donnie another four years.

I don’t believe the party bigwigs have learned anything. I suspect they think they can fool the voters into voting for a corporatist, because Donnie is so bad.

Why does the D Party exists if it refuses to promote progressive policies and mimics the R Party?

 

[georgephillip]

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

But not Reagan, Thatcher, and Bush?
Every POTUS since Carter has advanced the cause of neoliberal economics in the interest of those who own the means of production, proving once again how capitalism is designed to enrich private interests at the expense of the public.

Bernie is the best candidate for those who think the rich have too large a share of national income and wealth.

Wall Street sucks off the teat of big government just like other welfare queens. Especially when it comes to subsidies and bailouts. They also love globalism. That is why they tend to support the more Liberal candidates.

They all serve the same rich, white trash

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

I am still better off than most of the world-and so are you.

Why is it you and I are better off than most of the world?
Because the US has been the greatest purveyor of violence on this planet since the end of WWII.
How many more innocent human beings have to die in places like Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya with millions more on the chopping block in Africa so you can worship your big screen?

You mean like when Obama fought the war in Iraq for three years, bombed the shit out of Libya, when they did nothing to us, created ISIS and escalated the war in Iraq? Is that the kind of interventionism you are talking about?

He managed to do all that while at the same time increasing poverty, decreasing family income, destroying health care, running up tremendous debt and having dismal economic growth?

You mean like when Obama fought the war in Iraq for three years, bombed the shit out of Libya, when they did nothing to us, created ISIS and escalated the war in Iraq? Is that the kind of interventionism you are talking about?

Obama's war crimes are nothing more than a continuation of Truman's meddling in Korea or Ike's and JFK's and LBJ's blundering in Vietnam or Nixon's villainy in Laos and Cambodia...get the picture?

Your partisan blather condemning Obama's foreign and domestic failures while ignoring similar Republican perfidy makes me think you still believe there's a fundamental political difference between Democrats and Republicans.

One chart that shows how much worse income inequality is in America than Europe