sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
- Thread starter
- #321
The expert who did the test does explain that the genetic markers used to compare Warrens DNA against are those of natives from south/Latin America. Sure the tejanos were a people, official peoples or tribe, I really don’t care. That’s what they called themselves and that’s where we get the word Texas from. So we named the biggest state in the lower 48 after them, so I’d say they were a specific group. A group that on average has around 12% of South/Latin American dna in them.Incoherency? Because I type on my phone for this and don’t have the patience to correct typos for strangers? Run with that if you have too.You are a fucking idiot.So she listed her race as Natice American for her professorship...then told us a story about how her parents eloped because of disapproval of native ancestry. Really...someone actually objected to maybe (best case scenario, also unlikely) to 1/32 of being Native American?
Yeah.
So?
This just in for the uninitiated ---- that's how bigotry works ... from ignorance. Doesn't matter if it's 1/32nd or any degree at all, doesn't matter if it's even accurate --- just as it doesn't matter if that lynch victim really is guilty. Ignorance isn't interested in rationality.
What's your point here?
Warren is not native at all and her mother is barely more native than she is.
She fucking lied. Do you need a picture to understand that?
"Lied" huh.
--- About what?
Another victim walks right into his own hole.
See that post right above yours? That guy tried to sell this same bullshit yesterday. I called him out on it. Now look where he is -- melted down into a babbling blob of incoherency.
Your latest point has been that the report says nothing about Cherokee ancestry, because there isn’t a great pool of genetic data points for the Cherokee...The rest of the report says pretty definitively the rest of her genetic makeup is of European origin. So, I assume your overall point was going to be that “we don’t know if she does have Cherokee ancestry because there isn’t that great of a pool with those indetified Cherokee genetic traits.” Okay, so if we know that if she has something around .2 percent of South American native in her makeup, and the rest European...where is she going to magically going to gain more Cherokee DNA? Is she going to grow more chromosomes? Are we going to instal an extra mitochondria in all her cells?
Again where her extremely minimal native ancestry most likely came from, is someone in her family line was a son/daughter of a Tejano, (right by Oklahoma) mixed with a European about 4-5, maybe 6 or so generations ago.
My favorite tweet I’ve seen concerning this, although I don’t know who attribute it to. Was now that Richard spencer found out that Warren is 99.8% white, He has decided to endorsing her
The "post right above yours (his)" is not even your post, ergo it's not "your" incoherency. Start there. Wake me when you catch up.
NOR, just to look ahead, does the report say anything about the subject having "South American native" ancestry as such. Nor (AGAIN) does it say anything about "Tejano" --- which is not even a genetic group --- or "Oklahoma". In fact what it does say, immediately at the top of the first page, is that the lab had no knowledge of who the subject was.
Again the rest of her is all European, so where’s that Cherokee blood? The Cherokee’s were from much further north north east than Mexico. And then got kicked out of Oklahoma so Europeans could settle there.