ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course not. They should have looked out for their own self-interest rather than maintain a misguided loyalty to a political party that does nothing but trickle down crumbs to them. When has the Democratic party ever helped poor communities build a local economy? I mean the Republicans won't do that either but we expect that from them, but the Democrats make promises that they will help but just give some crumbs and expect those crumbs are sufficient.In other words, they shouldn't have bought into the Democrat's promises of taking care of them.I agree with you on that. A predominately black city should be self-reliant. They should have built a strong community among themselves, formed leadership councils to address the needs of their own community, built a local economy and whole bunch of things. They weren't being self-reliant when they could be and they relied too much on the white government to take care of their needs when they should have taken leadership and exercised self-determination. They relied on whites to trickle down some crumbs to them instead of taking their own destiny as a community into their own hands. They failed to exercise their power as a community and were taken advantage of.Ferguson is a predominantly black city that has been run by white's elected to office. If the Ferguson black community doesn't like the way things run in their city then they need to get off their collective asses and run for office to change them
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
I will never deny the fact that they have. But the Republican party is no better for any people.So, the Democrats deliberately set out to deceive the black community?Of course not. They should have looked out for their own self-interest rather than maintain a misguided loyalty to a political party that does nothing but trickle down crumbs to them. When has the Democratic party ever helped poor communities build a local economy? I mean the Republicans won't do that either but we expect that from them, but the Democrats make promises that they will help but just give some crumbs and expect those crumbs are sufficient.In other words, they shouldn't have bought into the Democrat's promises of taking care of them.I agree with you on that. A predominately black city should be self-reliant. They should have built a strong community among themselves, formed leadership councils to address the needs of their own community, built a local economy and whole bunch of things. They weren't being self-reliant when they could be and they relied too much on the white government to take care of their needs when they should have taken leadership and exercised self-determination. They relied on whites to trickle down some crumbs to them instead of taking their own destiny as a community into their own hands. They failed to exercise their power as a community and were taken advantage of.Ferguson is a predominantly black city that has been run by white's elected to office. If the Ferguson black community doesn't like the way things run in their city then they need to get off their collective asses and run for office to change them
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
As long as the locals stop assaulting them.
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
As long as the locals stop assaulting them.
We're talking about the other cases where an assault doesnt happen. But you know that already
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
As long as the locals stop assaulting them.
We're talking about the other cases where an assault doesnt happen. But you know that already
Like Mike Brown?
Why doesn't Al Sharpton protest there? Maybe because he doesn't care?"Whites don`t care about race" That will be the funniest thing anyone posts today. How many threads on this board are not about race?And Malcolm X would have agreed with you. He believed that the African American community should expect nothing good to come from White people. That they should be self-reliant and exercise self-determination and build their own economy and strengthen their own community and that White people have no business governing or policing a community that they are hostile towards. He believed that African Americans should do everything within their power to ensure justice and to protect their lives and property by any means necessary.Let them patrol themselves.
Malcolm x was an idiot....and reaped the death he deserved for the poison he preached....Whites are not hostile to blacks....they don't care about race....blacks are told that racism holds them back...by the political party that owned their ancestors as slaves and tried to keep them from voting...and after 60 years of voting for the racist party...the democrats...who hung them, bombed them, beat them and then finally used welfare to entrap them....they wonder why their community is such a mess...and why the rich democrats of all colors only have enough police to keep the rich democrats safe...while violent monsters run wild in black and Latino neighborhoods....
wised up...the democrat party hates you...stop voting for them....your children deserve a future...
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Actually Brown was 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) tall and weighed 292 lb.
NOt that Wilson was little guy, same height but Brown had 80 pounds on him.
Why didn't WIlson "hold the ham"? Oh, I don't know, maybe he thought in a civilized world that telling a kid not to jay walk wouldn't be a big thing.
That was pretty stupid, when you think about it...
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Actually Brown was 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) tall and weighed 292 lb.
NOt that Wilson was little guy, same height but Brown had 80 pounds on him.
Why didn't WIlson "hold the ham"? Oh, I don't know, maybe he thought in a civilized world that telling a kid not to jay walk wouldn't be a big thing.
That was pretty stupid, when you think about it...
Weird, holding the ham has nothing to do with Jaywalking
If the cops would not do as much cocaine they would not be so aggressive....Then the meth use makes them weaker, thus the need to shoot...Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Actually Brown was 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) tall and weighed 292 lb.
NOt that Wilson was little guy, same height but Brown had 80 pounds on him.
Why didn't WIlson "hold the ham"? Oh, I don't know, maybe he thought in a civilized world that telling a kid not to jay walk wouldn't be a big thing.
That was pretty stupid, when you think about it...
If the cops would not do as much cocaine they would not be so aggressive....Then the meth use makes them weaker, thus the need to shoot...Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
Can they patrol without shooting unarmed people? Or does that just a side effect of more patrols? Busting more heads?
No...that is a side effect of generations of children, having and raising children with no adult role models teaching civilized behavior so that when these 6' tall children attack police officers who give them orders to move off the street, it doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room......when a 6' tall, thug in training goes for your gun....that doesn't give you much choice.....
Nice story there but they shot people of all sizes for a bunch of reasons that dont include assault at all. How about those times?
Can they patrol without shooting someone saying they "were scared" and comparing same sized blacks to Hulk Hogan and children?
I mean seriously, why didnt anyone tell Wilson to hold the ham with a whopper like that. Overpowered.? Ok....A 5 year old next to Hogan. Dial it back a bit there bub
Actually Brown was 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) tall and weighed 292 lb.
NOt that Wilson was little guy, same height but Brown had 80 pounds on him.
Why didn't WIlson "hold the ham"? Oh, I don't know, maybe he thought in a civilized world that telling a kid not to jay walk wouldn't be a big thing.
That was pretty stupid, when you think about it...
Yep. He was a huge person. Compared Micheal Browns size....to the University of Missouri's SEC East Champions football roster.....hes bigger than almost every player on that team. Hes bigger than Missouri's #1 pro prospect...defensive lineman Shane Ray.
So anyone calling him a kid is an idiot. If he wasnt a lazy thug...and worked harder...he may have been a recruit to one of Missouri's college football programs and gotten a free college education.