Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WTC 7 SQUIBS
WTC 7 SQUIBS
Wait... I thought you said everything was done with thermitic cutting charges. Get your story straight, moron! Thermitic cutting charges aren't high explosives and wouldn't cause squibs! When are you going to start to realize you're contradicting yourself to the point you are completely irrelevant!
WTC 7 SQUIBS
Wait... I thought you said everything was done with thermitic cutting charges. Get your story straight, moron! Thermitic cutting charges aren't high explosives and wouldn't cause squibs! When are you going to start to realize you're contradicting yourself to the point you are completely irrelevant!
when are you going to stop pretending you understand explosives ?
Thermitic cutting charges work through heat to melt through beams using gravity. They don't move sideways and they're NOT high explosives. The supposed squibs are caused by overpressure from the high explosives blowing them out. Thermitic compounds don't do that. Learn a fucking thing or two before you expose your ignorance to the world if you want to have any credibility!so you are saying the building consisted of only columns supporting the penthouse and all others were "facaded columns"
No.
There were 24 columns in the center of the building and 58 perimeter columns (facade) as shown here.
If column 79 failed, what happened to the loads that column 79 supported in that area? How many trusses and girders do you see attached to column 79 in the above diagram. Now multiply that by how many floors. Where did all that weight go when column 79 failed?
Thermal expansion of floor beams breaking its beam seat connection and then causing a global collapse has never happened before, and very highly unlikely. Structural engineers do not design connections for lateral forces from thermal expansion because it is so rare. No structure before or after 9/11 has ever globally failed due to thermal expansion and its very doubtful if it was the cause of the collapse of WTC 7.
Thermal expansion for a 53 foot beam with a delta T of 654 F (752 body temp) is less then 2.7 inches.
Comment: Thermal expansion of floor beams breaking its beam seat connection and then causing a global collapse has never happened before, and very highly unlikely. Structural engineers do not design connections for lateral forces from thermal expansion because it is so rare. No structure before or after 9/11 has ever globally failed due to thermal expansion and its very doubtful if it was the cause of the collapse of WTC 7.
Reason for Comment: Structural engineers do not design connections for lateral forces for thermal expansion because it is so rare. Thermal expansion for a 53 foot beam with a delta T of 654 F (752 body temp) is less then 2.7 inches.
Wait... I thought you said everything was done with thermitic cutting charges. Get your story straight, moron! Thermitic cutting charges aren't high explosives and wouldn't cause squibs! When are you going to start to realize you're contradicting yourself to the point you are completely irrelevant!
when are you going to stop pretending you understand explosives ?
Oops! Too late!
How do you know they did not?
How do I know? Because the damn penthouse collapsed FIRST you fucking idiot. What the hell do you think was supporting the penthouse? Toothpicks? The columns below the penthouse clearly failed for it to collapse into the building BEFORE the perimeter facade came down. That means that the interior columns DID not fail/get removed at the same time as the facade columns. Chandler is an idiot.
Jesus H. Christ are you a moron. The lengths you go to to TRY and look intelligent on this subject is just beyond words.
so you are saying the building consisted of only columns supporting the penthouse and all others were "facaded columns"
Structural engineers do not design connections for lateral forces from thermal expansion because it is so rare.
I guess he got all the argument bitch slapped out of him.
I see PE is still incapable of anything other than cut and paste.
wait... I thought you said everything was done with thermitic cutting charges. Get your story straight, moron! Thermitic cutting charges aren't high explosives and wouldn't cause squibs! When are you going to start to realize you're contradicting yourself to the point you are completely irrelevant!
when are you going to stop pretending you understand explosives ?
Oops! Too late!
I see PE is still incapable of anything other than cut and paste.
I haven't posted anything in here yet. What argument? At least follow Cass sunstein rules more covertly...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHo5hNCvLb4&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Help put this TV Ad on the Air -- Go to RememberBuilding7.org[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related]YouTube - WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)[/ame]
How do I know? Because the damn penthouse collapsed FIRST you fucking idiot. What the hell do you think was supporting the penthouse? Toothpicks? The columns below the penthouse clearly failed for it to collapse into the building BEFORE the perimeter facade came down. That means that the interior columns DID not fail/get removed at the same time as the facade columns. Chandler is an idiot.
Jesus H. Christ are you a moron. The lengths you go to to TRY and look intelligent on this subject is just beyond words.
so you are saying the building consisted of only columns supporting the penthouse and all others were "facaded columns"
Hey eots. What have you got to say now. One of your one kind has posted information that shows you to be a complete ass. Remember when you said structural engineers design for thermal expansion due to fires?
Structural engineers do not design connections for lateral forces from thermal expansion because it is so rare.
Better set your bitch straight and get on the same page.
D-bags.
they really haven't a clue. They want it to be a conspiracy soooo bad that they cannot see the facts and their own contradictions.
It's true, just ask any of them, they'll tell you.....
They blew out the bottom of bldg 7 and caused the squibs at the top with silent explosions but they used super secret nano something and there was a count down that only sounded like it might have been a countdown and there was no plane in shanksville except that it was shot down and flight77 flew over the top of the pentagon and turned invisible because no one saw it fly away.........
It's so confusing to be a truther......
they really haven't a clue. They want it to be a conspiracy soooo bad that they cannot see the facts and their own contradictions.
It's true, just ask any of them, they'll tell you.....
They blew out the bottom of bldg 7 and caused the squibs at the top with silent explosions but they used super secret nano something and there was a count down that only sounded like it might have been a countdown and there was no plane in shanksville except that it was shot down and flight77 flew over the top of the pentagon and turned invisible because no one saw it fly away.........
It's so confusing to be a truther......
looks like you went from a elf to garden gnome in yer old age
Snakes in the grass never amount to much.
they really haven't a clue. They want it to be a conspiracy soooo bad that they cannot see the facts and their own contradictions.
It's true, just ask any of them, they'll tell you.....
They blew out the bottom of bldg 7 and caused the squibs at the top with silent explosions but they used super secret nano something and there was a count down that only sounded like it might have been a countdown and there was no plane in shanksville except that it was shot down and flight77 flew over the top of the pentagon and turned invisible because no one saw it fly away.........
it's so confusing to be a truther......
looks like you went from a elf to garden gnome in yer old age
yet he could still piss all over you....
Isn't it fun bashing other people instead of addressing the topic at hand, eots? The difference is i can address the topic. You can try, but your claims always end up smelling like shit and looking worse.
See? Another bullshit one liner from eots that bears no resemblance to the truth!looks like you went from a elf to garden gnome in yer old age
yet he could still piss all over you....
Isn't it fun bashing other people instead of addressing the topic at hand, eots? The difference is i can address the topic. You can try, but your claims always end up smelling like shit and looking worse.
you say nothing of relevance ever
You are very consistantly dishonest, eots. Still doesn't change the fact Ollie could piss all over a snake like you even if he were a garden gnome.
See? Another bullshit one liner from eots that bears no resemblance to the truth!yet he could still piss all over you....
Isn't it fun bashing other people instead of addressing the topic at hand, eots? The difference is i can address the topic. You can try, but your claims always end up smelling like shit and looking worse.
you say nothing of relevance ever
See? Another bullshit one liner from eots that bears no resemblance to the truth!you say nothing of relevance ever
what ? did you say something ?
Happens all the time to snakes in the grass. Must be why you're so woefully uninformed.
