SaltyNutz
VIP Member
- Dec 9, 2014
- 175
- 13
- 66
- Banned
- #101
So that makes it okay? LOL...why do you excuse poor behavior by whites?The whites rioting in Berkley are the anarchists who travel around California to take advantage of an unrest. They are largely irrelevant in situations where race is a factor, other than for the liberal media's useful idiots to point at and say, "See there are whites involved too."You should diversify your news sources and search for the truth. Being blinded by hate only shows you are a low info who with tunnel vision who ignores the truth.Those few whites in a few photos in one store? In Berkley?Yet you ignore the rioters and looters in Berkeley that were indeed white.To someone who's looking to equate Conservatism with racism, yes, but I have zero respect for people who need to see racism in every conversation.So do you appreciate that when you speak in generalities you can unintentionally come across as sounding racist?
I am assuming that isn't your intention. Given that the only means anyone here has of making a determination is based entirely on what you post do you agree that being more precise would be a better reflection of who you are when you are dealing with volatile issues?
Would you rephrase your original statement to something like there were unscrupulous individuals who exploited the situation by looting and pillaging for their own personal gain? Because that would be a more accurate reflection of what happened. All races were present in both the protests and the criminal activities. I am sure that you agree that the actions of the looters were not a reflection of those who were there to exercise their rights to protest.
And yes, I understand that you made a statement with your avi but upon reflection what is it telling others about who you are? If you want everyone to be an American then shouldn't you be setting an example instead?
We the People depend upon each other to uphold our rights. That is what the vast majority of the people in Ferguson were doing when they were out there protesting. I would have been with them if I was there.
No I won't rephrase my statement. I used the word "blacks" because nearly 100% of the people who were engaged in looting and burning were black.
Had I said something like blacks expect Conservatives to pay their rent, THAT would be a generalization. In fact, "Democrats" would be an more appropriate word in that case.
The avi? What is it telling others? If you or others want it to tell you I'm a racist, so be it. I don't much give a shit what you and assclap think.
You're absolutely right We the People do depend on one another for our rights. You are also right that the majority of the protesters were not looting or burning, but no, although I marched in support of equal rights and MLK, protesting the death of a thug that got shot trying to disarm a police officer is not worthy of my effort and I have zero sympathy except towards his parents. I would not have joined the throng in Ferguson not only because I disagree with the cause but also because as a white man, I would have been in danger. If you doubt me, go here: whites beaten in Ferguson - Google Search and educate yourself.
Find me a cause worthy of my time and I may just stand with you.
So tell me, SaltyNutz, does MSNBC pass out free Skittles? Or do they use you for free?