Venezuela’s Socialism Has Triggered Looting Instead of Shopping

It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.

How stupid are you? Name ONE instance of a socialist country ever thriving, or even surviving.
Try Europe. I'm not advocating for full on communism.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
Socialism is evil through and through, there are no redeeming qualities about it.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.

How stupid are you? Name ONE instance of a socialist country ever thriving, or even surviving.
Try Europe. I'm not advocating for full on communism.
2.jpg
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.

How stupid are you? Name ONE instance of a socialist country ever thriving, or even surviving.
Try Europe. I'm not advocating for full on communism.

Our economy is 50 times better than any country in Europe , try again.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.

How stupid are you? Name ONE instance of a socialist country ever thriving, or even surviving.
Try Europe. I'm not advocating for full on communism.


Europe only works because they only have to pay hand outs...they don't have to pay to actually protect themselves..we do that...if they had to have a functioning military they would collapse.
 
Venezuela continues to be the model democrats aspire to be. Following Venezuela is what Red Bernie's entire campaign is about.
So you won't mind the Right being compared to Nazis.


The national socialists were left wing, they hated capitalism and limited government....they differed from international socialists in that they only cared about Germany...not the world..
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
Its the power.
While I agree a lot of the "lack of separation" is based on fear, a lot of it is also based on human nature. Humans with that much power, will do whatever they have to to retain it.
That's why I am so against globalization. Who do people think will lead the world? It is going to be the same greedy elite people are always talking about taking advantage of people and shit. If they can fuck up the country like this, imagine how the world could be.
Wayyyy too much power. Leave the power to the people so we don't have to worry about it.
 
You reveal your ignorance, Hitler was Far Right.
Na, he was a socialist... A progressive one.
He was a gun control nutter
He was an abortionist
He was pro big controlling government
Dumbass

He actually modeled his extermination plans for Jewish folk off of the american approach to native americans. The us was a great example.
Ya, what the federal government did to Indians and continues too... FYI the federal government and the country are NOT one in the same. BTW "native Americans" is a pussyfied politically correct term imposed on us by POS career politicians...
You need to brush up on your facts... Lol


Capitalism is what was done the the indigenous people of the planet, and "Indians" is a term given them by a hopelessly lost euro dickhead.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.

How stupid are you? Name ONE instance of a socialist country ever thriving, or even surviving.

Name one thriving "capitalist" nation with no elements of socialism in its economic system - the US sure ain't one. Ask Wall Street how they like socialism.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
Its the power.
While I agree a lot of the "lack of separation" is based on fear, a lot of it is also based on human nature. Humans with that much power, will do whatever they have to to retain it.
That's why I am so against globalization. Who do people think will lead the world? It is going to be the same greedy elite people are always talking about taking advantage of people and shit. If they can fuck up the country like this, imagine how the world could be.
Wayyyy too much power. Leave the power to the people so we don't have to worry about it.

Neither us political party any intention of ever going near that.
 
It is called from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.....just because for the left that means the ability to take what others create and to demand to fill your needs by also taking what others have...they just haven't realized how to get past that...and never will....

Socialism should just call itself the philosophy of taking other people's crap.....and call it a day....
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
Its the power.
While I agree a lot of the "lack of separation" is based on fear, a lot of it is also based on human nature. Humans with that much power, will do whatever they have to to retain it.
That's why I am so against globalization. Who do people think will lead the world? It is going to be the same greedy elite people are always talking about taking advantage of people and shit. If they can fuck up the country like this, imagine how the world could be.
Wayyyy too much power. Leave the power to the people so we don't have to worry about it.

Neither us political party any intention of ever going near that.
umm ok
 
You reveal your ignorance, Hitler was Far Right.
Na, he was a socialist... A progressive one.
He was a gun control nutter
He was an abortionist
He was pro big controlling government
Dumbass
A gun control nutter? He lowered the age for possession of firearms and he carried out one of the biggest gun giveaways in history. He gave them spiffy looking uniforms too. Who are you calling ignorant?
Ya, he did with his followers...
History shows what he did to those who opposed him... Disarmed them, rounded them up and summarily executed millions of them... Dumbass
We know about the Holocaust and we know that Hitler was a pretty popular guy just like Trump. Whatever the case, why are you freaks so gullible as to believe anything the gun/criminal lobby tells you? Maybe you`re not gullible, just stupid.
Fake Quote Files: Adolf Hitler on Gun Registration, Conquest and Disarmament
 
Socialism isn't the problem; corruption and complete mismanagement is the country's problem. Socialism in itself is not the problem.
Even Marx said socialism would fail
Humans are too greedy for this bullshit to work. The central government gets wayyy too much power. Look at history. Socialism IS the problem.
I agree with you about the greedy part. What I have trouble with is, why socialism as an economic system can't seem to be separated from authoritarian rule or dictatorship in people's minds. Marx knew he was writing about a 'perfect' utopian society, but I don't think we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The concept of 'sharing the wealth' or even part of the wealth doesn't have to mean ultimate communism unless we choose to make it that way.
Its the power.
While I agree a lot of the "lack of separation" is based on fear, a lot of it is also based on human nature. Humans with that much power, will do whatever they have to to retain it.
That's why I am so against globalization. Who do people think will lead the world? It is going to be the same greedy elite people are always talking about taking advantage of people and shit. If they can fuck up the country like this, imagine how the world could be.
Wayyyy too much power. Leave the power to the people so we don't have to worry about it.

Neither us political party any intention of ever going near that.
umm ok

They're both playing the same game, think about it, goes back to the founders. Madison was vociferously against the commoners having a say. The senate was the original american old boys club - unelected.
 
You reveal your ignorance, Hitler was Far Right.
Na, he was a socialist... A progressive one.
He was a gun control nutter
He was an abortionist
He was pro big controlling government
Dumbass
A gun control nutter? He lowered the age for possession of firearms and he carried out one of the biggest gun giveaways in history. He gave them spiffy looking uniforms too. Who are you calling ignorant?
Ya, he did with his followers...
History shows what he did to those who opposed him... Disarmed them, rounded them up and summarily executed millions of them... Dumbass
We know about the Holocaust and we know that Hitler was a pretty popular guy just like Trump. Whatever the case, why are you freaks so gullible as to believe anything the gun/criminal lobby tells you? Maybe you`re not gullible, just stupid.
Fake Quote Files: Adolf Hitler on Gun Registration, Conquest and Disarmament


"
The Moral of the Story Is…
There’s plenty of good arguments against gun control, but invoking the Nazis every time you need a trump card is lazy and dishonest. The Hitler card is worn out. If you’re worried about a fascist dictator arising in America, you should be looking for hawkish, ultra right-wing, hyper-nationalist, xenophobic, racist, authoritarian, war-mongering populists with major public support."

Agreed.
 
Socialism is looting. Before it falls apart the looting is organized. Then it falls into chaos. Venezuela is feeling the Bern baby and burning it is!

Lootings are becoming a common occurrence in Venezuela, as the country’s food shortage resulted in yet another reported incident of violence in a supermarket — this time in the Luvebras Automarket located in the La Florida Province of Caracas.

Venezuela's Socialism Has Triggered Looting Instead of Shopping

Democratic Socialism at its finest! Venezuela is a cautionary tale for America. It is what awaits us if Bernie manages to win.
 
Socialism is looting. Before it falls apart the looting is organized. Then it falls into chaos. Venezuela is feeling the Bern baby and burning it is!

Lootings are becoming a common occurrence in Venezuela, as the country’s food shortage resulted in yet another reported incident of violence in a supermarket — this time in the Luvebras Automarket located in the La Florida Province of Caracas.

Venezuela's Socialism Has Triggered Looting Instead of Shopping

Democratic Socialism at its finest! Venezuela is a cautionary tale for America. It is what awaits us if Bernie manages to win.

Horse shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top