Va. And Md. Governors Demand Garland Ban Protests Outside Justices Homes

Gee, I wonder why.

The FBI was lying about Trump before he even took office.

The BLM riots wouldn't have happened AT ALL if Trump wasn't president.

They started under Obama. They really got started at the death of Eric Garner that Obama punted on.
 
Well I guess it's good you have abandoned the original argument..
nobody ever argued that protest were illegal. You were the one talking aboiut protest....we have been discussing the demafascist brownshirts that have been going to Judge's homes and threatening them and intimdating them which is a crime....but Xiden and Garland aren't enforcing the law and apparently are openly encouraging this behavior.
 
nobody ever argued that protest were illegal. You were the one talking aboiut protest....we have been discussing the demafascist brownshirts that have been going to Judge's homes and threatening them and intimdating them which is a crime....but Xiden and Garland aren't enforcing the law and apparently are openly encouraging this behavior.

The argument was that protesting was illegal and those protesting should be arrested.

See thread title and initial argument.
 
No, you seem to be the only one suggesting what these brownshirts are doing is a protest.

It's not possible to arrest someone over what you are suggesting they are doing.

You aren't a fan of our Constitutional protections are you?
 
It's not possible to arrest someone over what you are suggesting they are doing.

You aren't a fan of our Constitutional protections are you?
The US Constitution doesn't protect people who threaten judges, and try to intimidate them to rule a certain way on a case.
 
nobody ever argued that protest were illegal. You were the one talking aboiut protest....we have been discussing the demafascist brownshirts that have been going to Judge's homes and threatening them and intimdating them which is a crime....but Xiden and Garland aren't enforcing the law and apparently are openly encouraging this behavior.
There is no doubt the lefties try to intimidate people with their "protests"
 
You can continue to repeat over and over what has been covered all you want, it changes nothing.

People have a constitutional right to protest, even Supreme Court rulings.
But it is unlawful to go to their home and do so.
Presuming that they were on the sidewalk then they are in the right of way BUT the owner is charged with maintaining that area and as such courts have ruled with that responsibility that rights are conferred
Simply put, despite liberals doing apples to donuts Once Again, you can protest in front of the SC building; you can’t do that at a SC justice residence.
 
Here is the law dumbshit.

As usual, you have no earthly idea what you're talking about...

The very first part:

"Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty"

A prosecution of any of them would have to prove intent. Not easy.

That's why States are considering passing their own laws that make no mention of intent.

You can claim there is intent. But the hopes and dreams of an internet poster are not how these things are decided, in our country.
 
Unfortunate SC justices don’t live in MD or authorities would do the correct and legal thing and disperse the lawbreakers.
 
Unfortunate SC justices don’t live in MD or authorities would do the correct and legal thing and disperse the lawbreakers.
The protests outside Kavanaugh's home continued this past week.

He lives in Maryland.

What color is the sky in your fantasyland?
 

Forum List

Back
Top