Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uhhh who committed the only murdering on Jan 6? As usual, you have no facts only made-up baloney. As for prosecuting Trump, you Dimmers have been trying for years. Why not go ahead and jail your own known felons?You mean like the murderous Trumpers on January 6 2021 at the Capitol?
So when do you law enforcing Republicans plan on prosecuting Trump?
Federal law prohibits “pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” when it is “with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer.”Exercising your right to protest is perfectly legal, and Republicans are a criminal enterprise. Nitwit.
A black Deep State goonUhhh who committed the only murdering on Jan 6? As usual, you have no facts only made-up baloney. As for prosecuting Trump, you Dimmers have been trying for years. Why not go ahead and jail your own known felons?
Correct. It was a brave officer doing the one job he was paid to do.A black Deep State goon
Though legally it was technically not murder
Stupid DimmersFederal law prohibits “pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” when it is “with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer.”
Nitwit.
Right, because it was a Trump follower who was murdered.A black Deep State goon
Though legally it was technically not murder
They're already illegal, you violent fucking punk.The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states.
Youngkin actually tried to make Alito’s entire neighborhood sacred, or at least heavily restricted, ground. He asked local authorities to set up a perimeter around the area, limiting who could enter, and offered the state police to help. Fairfax County officials essentially told him to shove it.
People going into clinics for legal medical care are routinely harassed and threatened by anti-abortion protesters. Abortion providers live under constant threat. But a few candlelight vigils and peaceful protests directed at Supreme Court justices who hold power over the lives of everyone in this country and we’re supposed to be shocked and deeply concerned.
The Supreme Court has never been as insulated from politics as its defenders would have us believe, but now? The Supreme Court of Kavanaugh and Alito and Barrett? Of Clarence Thomas and his insurrectionist wife? A Supreme Court with five justices nominated by men who got into the White House after losing the popular vote? Spare me the pieties about the sanctity of the institution.
Virginia and Maryland governors demand that Garland ban protest outside justices' homes
The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states. Maryland’s Larry Hogan and Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin cited a 1950 law...m.dailykos.com
Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.
These aren't lawful protests, assclown.Republicans want to silence lawful protest.
Exercising your right to protest is perfectly legal, and Republicans are a criminal enterprise. Nitwit.
Then why has nobody been arrested?
So, you're admitting your hypocrisy? That's a start.The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states.
Youngkin actually tried to make Alito’s entire neighborhood sacred, or at least heavily restricted, ground. He asked local authorities to set up a perimeter around the area, limiting who could enter, and offered the state police to help. Fairfax County officials essentially told him to shove it.
People going into clinics for legal medical care are routinely harassed and threatened by anti-abortion protesters. Abortion providers live under constant threat. But a few candlelight vigils and peaceful protests directed at Supreme Court justices who hold power over the lives of everyone in this country and we’re supposed to be shocked and deeply concerned.
The Supreme Court has never been as insulated from politics as its defenders would have us believe, but now? The Supreme Court of Kavanaugh and Alito and Barrett? Of Clarence Thomas and his insurrectionist wife? A Supreme Court with five justices nominated by men who got into the White House after losing the popular vote? Spare me the pieties about the sanctity of the institution.
Virginia and Maryland governors demand that Garland ban protest outside justices' homes
The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states. Maryland’s Larry Hogan and Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin cited a 1950 law...m.dailykos.com
Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.
Nonsense. Good luck with that fantasy. Else I could have every kid arrested who was yelling in the street.What is legal and protected under the First Amendment is peaceable assembly. Invading a neighborhood, creating a lot of noise, crowds, disruption, denying all residents of that neighborhood the ability to enjoy peace in their own homes, is not peaceable, and not protected or legal.
Or feels that it's not a good case. Gotta prove intent for every individual. Good luck.Because Malfeasant Corrupt Asshole Garland is refusing to do his job.
The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states.
Youngkin actually tried to make Alito’s entire neighborhood sacred, or at least heavily restricted, ground. He asked local authorities to set up a perimeter around the area, limiting who could enter, and offered the state police to help. Fairfax County officials essentially told him to shove it.
People going into clinics for legal medical care are routinely harassed and threatened by anti-abortion protesters. Abortion providers live under constant threat. But a few candlelight vigils and peaceful protests directed at Supreme Court justices who hold power over the lives of everyone in this country and we’re supposed to be shocked and deeply concerned.
The Supreme Court has never been as insulated from politics as its defenders would have us believe, but now? The Supreme Court of Kavanaugh and Alito and Barrett? Of Clarence Thomas and his insurrectionist wife? A Supreme Court with five justices nominated by men who got into the White House after losing the popular vote? Spare me the pieties about the sanctity of the institution.
Virginia and Maryland governors demand that Garland ban protest outside justices' homes
The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states. Maryland’s Larry Hogan and Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin cited a 1950 law...m.dailykos.com
Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.
I don't understandThe Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are ...
There is no right to protest, idiotExercising your right to protest is perfectly legal, and Republicans are a criminal enterprise. Nitwit.
What's lawful about it?Republicans want to silence lawful protest.
Because they are appealing to a federal law.I don't understand
Why don't they just do it themselves?
Why do they need Garland?
Maybe because it's obvious now that the Dems who control DC are simply going to ignore laws they disagree with. So be it. Payback's a bitch.Then why do the governors have to request a ban? Maybe... you're wrong?
