US, USSR, NK, Iran

I think Kim is a nut, but I don't think he's stupid. He's trying to intimidate and prove he's worthy of the world stage. Problem is that nut part and if that takes over or not (like it did with Hitler vs Russia.) As stupid as it sounds, we're kind of better off hyping his antics up and making a big deal out of it so he can get his worthless validation. Think of it as a meaningless peace gesture, it can be a private joke... The other option is we deep 6 his dumb ass and deal with the reality that the US just hypocritically destroyed the "government" of a foreign nation heh
Hitler said what he was going to do and everyone ignored it.
 
People who say their going to kill and annihilate others usually do.
Iran and Korea do not kill and annihilate others. The US does.

Iran does, through proxies. One of the largest if not largest sponsors of terrorism
Wrong again. Iran fights western sponsored terrorism. Hezbollah fights western sponsored terrorism. Global terrorism is a tool of the US foreign policy. Except for the US and Israel, global terrorism strikes daily. The US has created al-Qaeda and used them since then. "Fighting terrorism" and "killing Bin Laden" are tales for the public.
Who else on USMB agrees with you on this?
Enough. It is not only full of party lapdogs.
Name one.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
 
Yeah I don't honestly think there is a single "nutjob" running a legit country that doesn't realize if they lob a nuke practically the entire planet will end them immediately... It's not even really a contentious matter either, probably one of the very few things that could, at least momentarily, bring about a true global agreement and unified response. I imagine even fucking China would shit kittens and jump on board against nit-wit if he actually opened fire...
 
Iran and Korea do not kill and annihilate others. The US does.

Iran does, through proxies. One of the largest if not largest sponsors of terrorism
Wrong again. Iran fights western sponsored terrorism. Hezbollah fights western sponsored terrorism. Global terrorism is a tool of the US foreign policy. Except for the US and Israel, global terrorism strikes daily. The US has created al-Qaeda and used them since then. "Fighting terrorism" and "killing Bin Laden" are tales for the public.
Who else on USMB agrees with you on this?
Enough. It is not only full of party lapdogs.
Name one.
There are plenty. Your either completely ignorant and out of touch with reality or stay in your own threads only.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.
 
Iran does, through proxies. One of the largest if not largest sponsors of terrorism
Wrong again. Iran fights western sponsored terrorism. Hezbollah fights western sponsored terrorism. Global terrorism is a tool of the US foreign policy. Except for the US and Israel, global terrorism strikes daily. The US has created al-Qaeda and used them since then. "Fighting terrorism" and "killing Bin Laden" are tales for the public.
Who else on USMB agrees with you on this?
Enough. It is not only full of party lapdogs.
Name one.
There are plenty. Your either completely ignorant and out of touch with reality or stay in your own threads only.
So you're the only one on USMB with those views.

That's a plus.
 
Wrong again. Iran fights western sponsored terrorism. Hezbollah fights western sponsored terrorism. Global terrorism is a tool of the US foreign policy. Except for the US and Israel, global terrorism strikes daily. The US has created al-Qaeda and used them since then. "Fighting terrorism" and "killing Bin Laden" are tales for the public.
Who else on USMB agrees with you on this?
Enough. It is not only full of party lapdogs.
Name one.
There are plenty. Your either completely ignorant and out of touch with reality or stay in your own threads only.
So you're the only one on USMB with those views.

That's a plus.
You are wrong again. Even your eager Trump supporter "Sunni Man" doesn´t like ISIS because "the US made them".
 
China wants a neutral unified Korea for PR reasons. While that sounds acceptable getting to there from here without angering Japan, Russia or India is a real bear.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.

Fatboy doesn't want to die anymore than Hitler did- if England had had nukes in 1940, Hitler wouldn't have gone to war.

Iran doesn't want to die- you are confusing Iran with ISIS- who does want to initiate a war between Islam and the West.

Study whas going on.
 
China wants a neutral unified Korea for PR reasons. While that sounds acceptable getting to there from here without angering Japan, Russia or India is a real bear.

I don't think China wants a unified Korea- that would be a strong country allied to the United States- China doesn't want that.

China also doesn't want NK to collapse.

They want a more tractable NK and a less powerful SK.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.

Fatboy doesn't want to die anymore than Hitler did- if England had had nukes in 1940, Hitler wouldn't have gone to war.

Iran doesn't want to die- you are confusing Iran with ISIS- who does want to initiate a war between Islam and the West.

Study whas going on.

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had nukes? He'd have used them in a New York minute
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.

Fatboy doesn't want to die anymore than Hitler did- if England had had nukes in 1940, Hitler wouldn't have gone to war.

Iran doesn't want to die- you are confusing Iran with ISIS- who does want to initiate a war between Islam and the West.

Study what is going on.

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had nukes? He'd have used them in a New York minute

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had 2 nukes- and England had 600? Study the beginning of WW2- Hitler was very careful orchestrating each of his moves.

Hitler didn't go to war risking his own life.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.

Fatboy doesn't want to die anymore than Hitler did- if England had had nukes in 1940, Hitler wouldn't have gone to war.

Iran doesn't want to die- you are confusing Iran with ISIS- who does want to initiate a war between Islam and the West.

Study what is going on.

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had nukes? He'd have used them in a New York minute

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had 2 nukes- and England had 600? Study the beginning of WW2- Hitler was very careful orchestrating each of his moves.

Hitler didn't go to war risking his own life.
Japan attacked because they considered us incapable of fighting.
 
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union we had a standoff of two nations pointing thousands of intercontinental missiles tipped with nuclear warheads at each other.

But nobody pulled the trigger because both sides wanted to live to see tomorrow.

Now North Korea has intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to go on them. Soon Iran will too.

I don't see a standoff happening for very long.

You don't think that fatboy in NK wants to live to see tomorrow?

Or that the generals in Iran don't want to live to see tomorrow?

Launching a nuclear armed ICBM or two is just a good way to get your country to a nice toasty shade of radioactive dust.
Fat boy is like Hitler. Thinks he will win.

Iran wants to die, they think they can initiate the end times.

Study what's going on.

Fatboy doesn't want to die anymore than Hitler did- if England had had nukes in 1940, Hitler wouldn't have gone to war.

Iran doesn't want to die- you are confusing Iran with ISIS- who does want to initiate a war between Islam and the West.

Study what is going on.

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had nukes? He'd have used them in a New York minute

Would Hitler have gone to war if he had 2 nukes- and England had 600? Study the beginning of WW2- Hitler was very careful orchestrating each of his moves.

Hitler didn't go to war risking his own life.

Stop changing parameters to suit your agenda
 

Forum List

Back
Top