There was no"contingency" involved in the plan Clark reported.General Wesley Clark was painted as a crazy person when he stated this in early 2007
The Plan -- according to U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) - YouTube
Not so crazy today.
Wesley Clark should be tried for espionage, and or perjury.
If what he says is true, it would have been ultra-secret National Security information. The Defense Department should have 'contingency' plans to, "take out", any Country that is, or may in the future, be a threat to the United States or our allies. They would be classified, "ULTRA SECRET" and if released could cause embarrassment at the least and grave harm at the most to our Country. With the clearance I had at the time of the Cuban missile Crisis I was privy to the Marine Amphibious Invasion of Cuba by the First marine Division, landing sites and all. (It's been over thirty years so I'm clear)
If the Pentagon doesn't have 'contingency' plans to deal with potential enemies the Department of Defense is guilty of dereliction of duty.
Two days after 911 Clark was told Rumsfeld ordered preparations for an invasion of Iraq.
Less than two months later, the same source to Clark six other Muslim states were destined for regime change.
Clark's crime was not revealing this information to US citizens in late 2001.