LadyGunSlinger
Conservative Babe
- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,348
- 280
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
So now we have a 2nd HAG who has accused Mr. Cain that just so happens to work in Obama's Administration.. you liberals are a bunch of low life fuckers! This shit is going to hit the fan! LYNCHING of an innocent black man.. UNFUCKINGREAL.. sickos!
.... communications director at the Inspector Generals Office of the Treasury Department, a position she has held since last year.
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
What would the right thing be? It's civil law, not criminal.
Notice how that piece goes on about her wanting to remain anonymous, too?
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
you're conflating two different people
carry on
Wonder who will really pay it?Notice how that piece goes on about her wanting to remain anonymous, too?
yeah...I love it..
"she is a good person"...and "she just wants to do the right thing"
Yet, she accepted a monetary settlement to "not do the right thing"
Dont these people hear what they are saying? I mean...really? She was wiling to accept money in exchange of NOT doing the right thing but she is a good person who NOW wants to do the right thing.
Pathetic.
Nice pose she did for the title pic, too.
"Anonymous".
And, ironically enough, she never filed a complaint, either. Yet, 12 years later, here she is with nothing but a 'she said'.
And, she'll have to pay back all settlement monies.
She posed for the article pic, so her wanting nothing to do with this doesn't seem too probable a claim at this point. And, now that she has come forward, she has broken the settlement agreement. I imagine that the NRA will take action against her for that.I did read the article, and it seems to me this person has been working for the Federal Govt. for sometime now, and given that fact if the logic of her being part of the Obama Administration holds true, then would it not also hold true she was part of the Bush Administration ? The point here is this, it appears according to article the woman really doesn't want anything further to do with this issue beyond the settlement and in my humble opinion that should be respected.