United Nations Chimes In

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Here it comes! Proof that it will take a landslide victory to overcome the preparations being laid down to cancel a Romney victory:

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), a United Nations affiliate on democratization and human rights, will send out 44 “observers” to the United States on Election Day to monitor polling and political activities. In particular, these “election monitors” will be looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups.

“Conservative groups” means Tea Parties, and conservative ideals —— not Republicans in general. It would be too obvious to say “Election monitors will be looking for voter suppression activities by Republicans, or by individual conservatives.”

The goal in identifying a specific political ideology is to allow UNITED NATIONS monitors to wink at the activities of groups like the New Black Panthers. And it’s not only UN garbage:


Some states, including Missouri, South Dakota, North Dakota, and New Mexico, permit international observation during elections.

XXXXX

Democrats say the AFL-CIO will send out 300 lawyers to monitor poll workers and groups that might challenge voter registration.

In addition, other civil rights and environmental groups and unions such as Service Employees International Union (SEIU) will dispatch thousands of poll watchers throughout the country.

In a close election it could very easily come down to overturning the results in one of the UN states. And let’s not forget the Senate races. Remember how Al Franken got to the Senate. If the result of the presidential race is overturned in just one state what’s to stop Communists from overturning Senate races, too.

Foreign policy debate

If ever there was a topic that belonged in tonight’s foreign policy debate it is US membership in the United Nations. There is no doubt where Hussein & Company stand on America’s sovereignty. They would surrender it to the UN in a heartbeat. The question is: Where does Romney stand? He should scream bloody murder for this reason alone:


News of the UN-affiliated observers comes one day after Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Joel Pollak reported that the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights has warned Americans not to elect Republican candidate Mitt Romney as the next president. Alluding to Romney’s refusal to ban waterboarding in interrogation practices of terror detainees, Ben Emmerson of the UN said that electing Romney would be “a democratic mandate for torture."

UN GROUP TO MONITOR U.S. CONSERVATIVE POLL WATCHERS
by Dr. Susan Berry 21 Oct 2012

UN Group to Monitor U.S. Conservative Poll Watchers

Were I debating Hussein I would point out that Democrats mounted their phoney moral high horse over interrogation techniques faster than the Lone Ranger ever jumped on Silver. At the same time they defended the killers their foreign policy gave aid and comfort to the enemy killing our military men and women.

Finally, Hussein’s foreign policy is simple when it comes to defending this country: Cut and Run in war and in peace. I doubt if Romney will point out that thousands of Americans will have died in vain after Hussein starts bragging about cutting and running from Iraq and Afghanistan.

See this thread for more on the topic:


 
What the hell does the UN have to do with our election process?
 
What the hell does the SEIU have to do with our election process?
 
What the hell does the UN have to do with our election process?

To tjvh: Moral and financial support for the UN’s global government agenda.

What the hell does the SEIU have to do with our election process?

To tjvh: Provide the muscle and money for intimidation purposes.

Obama, which is technically treason, is the head of the UN Security Council.

To TakeAStepBack: Exactly so. And he never stops working at it.

The greater tragedy is that US membership in the United Nations decriminalized treason. Lawyers set it up so that no government official can be charged with treason so long as the betrayal is under the UN’s umbrella. Harvard lawyer Alger Hiss was in charge of setting up the United Nations. That’s one of the reasons I’ve always said nothing good ever came out of either institution.

It would be a helluva lot worse were it not for the Connally Reservation. Without the Connally Reservation the UN could take American election results to the ICC. Of course the ICC cannot enforce its decisions on the American people, but Hussein & Company could then use the ICC’s decision as justification in our courts for overturning elections. There are four United Nations-loving justices on the SCOTUS already.

Here is a brief excerpt from an 2005 article identifying the Connally Reservation:


Of more concern to the country is Connally Reservation, which, in six words, may keep the U.S. from falling to the control of the UN and the International Criminal Court, (ICC).

Before ratifying the United Nations Charter in 1945, the Senate was wise enough to amend the section dealing with the World Court by barring the Court from jurisdiction over matters which were essentially domestic "AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES."

Those six words, authored by Senator Tom Connally (D-Texas), are known as the "Connally Reservation" and are the only thing which COULD prevent the World Court from interfering in American internal affairs on the pretext that our tariffs, immigration laws, school curriculums, etc., affect American relations with other countries and are therefore "foreign" and not "domestic."

Guns=Freedom or Why is The Second Amendment So Important?
10/23/2005

Kenders' Musings: Guns=Freedom or Why is The Second Amendment So Important?

The battle over repealing the Connally Reservation has been ongoing since 1946 —— most of it below the public’s radar screen. Connally’s Amendment to the UN Charter has protected Americans from more than an average person like me could ever cover; not the least of those protections was shielding our Second Amendment from UN gun control advocates. Should you research it, I think you’ll be surprised, and maybe disappointed, in some of the people who supported repealing the Connally Reservation.

The UN has become so overtly anti-America in recent years I like to think the tide has turned for all time against the forces for repeal. Even better, withdrawing from the UN has slowly been gaining ground since the Internet came into being.

Here’s an excerpt from a 1960 Time Magazine article.


Through Washington this week spanged the opening shots of a battle over whether or not the U.S. will work wholeheartedly to help develop a world rule of law. The battleground was the 83rd annual meeting of the American Bar Association. Drawn up on one side were the forces that want the U.S. to lead in establishing a workable system of international law, on the other a determined rear guard, that is ready to fight tooth-and-nail to halt a necessary practical step. Point at issue is the so-called Connally Reservation, by which the U.S. reserves the right to label any...

You must subscribe to read the full article:

Chance to Go Forward
Monday, Sep. 05, 1960

THE LAW: Chance to Go Forward - TIME
 
Last edited:
Where the hell were they when thugs dressed like storm troopers carrying clubs were intimidating voters in Chicago?
 
If the United Nations was serious about voter fraud it would be focusing its efforts on the corrupt far left Democrat Party, but it's obviously here just to stir up trouble.

I hope to hear of many more states joining with Texas in their anti-United Nations campaign and boot them out of the US.....Permanently!
 
Here is a brief excerpt from an 2005 article identifying the Connally Reservation:

Of more concern to the country is Connally Reservation, which, in six words, may keep the U.S. from falling to the control of the UN and the International Criminal Court, (ICC).

Before ratifying the United Nations Charter in 1945, the Senate was wise enough to amend the section dealing with the World Court by barring the Court from jurisdiction over matters which were essentially domestic "AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES."

Those six words, authored by Senator Tom Connally (D-Texas), are known as the "Connally Reservation" and are the only thing which COULD prevent the World Court from interfering in American internal affairs on the pretext that our tariffs, immigration laws, school curriculums, etc., affect American relations with other countries and are therefore "foreign" and not "domestic."
Those six words are no guarantee of sovereignty because they are dependent upon who and what political party is in power to make THE DETERMINATION FOR THE UNITED STATES when the effectiveness of the Connally Reservation is put to the ultimate test!
 

Forum List

Back
Top