Taxpayer money, which pays public sector union workers. A portion of their pay is taken for union dues, a portion of which is being used by union bosses to pay rent for The D.C. Occupy movement..."money laundering"
So when a public sector employee buys a hamburger for lunch, are "the taxpayers" paying for his hamburger?
Not to mention, SEIU isn't, for the most part, a "public sector" union...
The fact that it's not all taxpayer money really doesn't matter does it? Still taking union members dues and using them to pay expenses for Occupy. Who decision was this? Was there a vote? A meeting discussing this or did union bosses just decide to pay their rent?
Actually, none of it is "taxpayer money". It stops being "taxpayer money" the moment it became someone's paycheck.
And if you're upset about Union PAC money, you can thank Citizen's United.