Unexpectedly: The New York Times discovers that many don’t have to work in the age of Obama

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
Well it is thank a liberal day they say. So we should thank them for helping in DESTROYING our country. Way to go Barak what a LEGACY

SNIP:
You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything.
He was right when he called Russia America’s “number one geopolitical foe.” With Moscow occupying sovereign foreign territory in Europe for the first time since 1989, and as American tanks and possibly even nuclear weapons are headed back to the European front, the 1980s called and they clearly got their foreign policy back.

He was right to warn about the expansion of Islamic extremists into formerly obscure places like Northern Mali. Despite being mocked by the unduly self-assured for his insistence that Islamic radicalism in North Africa was a threat to global security, France introduced troops into that country in 2013 at the behest of Mali’s president in order to quell the raging conflict between Islamist insurgents and government forces.
He was right about Detroit. When the Motor City became the biggest metropolis in American history to declare bankruptcy last year, many recalled the headline which The New York Times assigned to a Romney op-ed in which he had recommended that the city’s automobile manufacturers undergo a structured bankruptcy in 2009. “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt,” the headline read.


But this latest source of vindication for the former Republican presidential nominee may just be the sweetest.


In 2012, Romney was dogged by comments he made to a closed-door meeting of donors. There, the former Massachusetts governor said that 47 percent of the public would never vote for him because they pay no income tax and are more satisfied to support the party which promises them federal assistance in order to ease their financial burden. For these comments he was called callous, cruel, and indifferent to suboptimal conditions faced by the nation’s working poor.


Two years after his defeat, The New York Times has discovered that Mitt Romney had a point.
“Working, in America, is in decline,” The Times reported on Friday. “The share of prime-age men — those 25 to 54 years old — who are not working has more than tripled since the late 1960s, to 16 percent.”
The United States, which had one of the highest employment rates among developed nations as recently as 2000, has fallen toward the bottom of the list,” the report continued.

ALL of it here:
Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air
 
For some reason, Staph-knee needs to be told what to think and how to feel from her so called news sources.

Your "HotAir" (an appropriate name) source has been disqualified as news, starting from the first sentence.

"You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything."

Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air

Why is HotAir telling you what you know?

A real news article leaves out bias and opinion. An actual NEWS story is one that contains no characterizations of people or incidents. News is what happened. Bias is the spin put on it by sites like "HotAir" who want to tell you what to think about what happened, tell you what emotion you should experience according to their perception, not your own.

Why can't Staph-knee think for herself?
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?
 
For some reason, Staph-knee needs to be told what to think and how to feel from her so called news sources.

Your "HotAir" (an appropriate name) source has been disqualified as news, starting from the first sentence.

"You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything."

Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air

Why is HotAir telling you what you know?

A real news article leaves out bias and opinion. An actual NEWS story is one that contains no characterizations of people or incidents. News is what happened. Bias is the spin put on it by sites like "HotAir" who want to tell you what to think about what happened, tell you what emotion you should experience according to their perception, not your own.

Why can't Staph-knee think for herself?

Where does she claim this is a "news source"???

Its clearly an opinion piece on a NYT article.

So I guess Daily Kos doesn't count as a "source" by your logic either, right?

Typical prog debating about the wrapping instead of the content.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...
 
For some reason, Staph-knee needs to be told what to think and how to feel from her so called news sources.

Your "HotAir" (an appropriate name) source has been disqualified as news, starting from the first sentence.

"You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything."

Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air

Why is HotAir telling you what you know?

A real news article leaves out bias and opinion. An actual NEWS story is one that contains no characterizations of people or incidents. News is what happened. Bias is the spin put on it by sites like "HotAir" who want to tell you what to think about what happened, tell you what emotion you should experience according to their perception, not your own.

Why can't Staph-knee think for herself?

Where does she claim this is a "news source"???

Its clearly an opinion piece on a NYT article.

So I guess Daily Kos doesn't count as a "source" by your logic either, right?

Typical prog debating about the wrapping instead of the content.


I never use Daily Kos as a news source.
 
So how 'bout allowing a jobs infrastructure act (perfect time STILL) or a training program for 3 million tech jobs going begging, mindless obstructionist Pubs and hater dupes?

OP is the RW way of trying to blame Obama for the Booosh Great Recession. Idiocy.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

I bet you're silly enough to think that the financial meltdown caused by Fanny and Freddie, which was authored, operated, and defended exclusively by Democrats, had nothing to do with it. No, it has to be Bush's fault. You Leftists can lie to yourselves, but you can't lie to us. Did you see the last election?
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

I bet you're silly enough to think that the financial meltdown caused by Fanny and Freddie, which was authored, operated, and defended exclusively by Democrats, had nothing to do with it. No, it has to be Bush's fault. You Leftists can lie to yourselves, but you can't lie to us. Did you see the last election?
Considering F+F's share of the market went from 75% to 25% in 2003 when when corrupt Booosh cronies like Countrywide and AIG took over, it's clear you're a brainwashed functional moron. Read something.
 
For some reason, Staph-knee needs to be told what to think and how to feel from her so called news sources.

Your "HotAir" (an appropriate name) source has been disqualified as news, starting from the first sentence.

"You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything."

Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air

Why is HotAir telling you what you know?

A real news article leaves out bias and opinion. An actual NEWS story is one that contains no characterizations of people or incidents. News is what happened. Bias is the spin put on it by sites like "HotAir" who want to tell you what to think about what happened, tell you what emotion you should experience according to their perception, not your own.

Why can't Staph-knee think for herself?

Where does she claim this is a "news source"???

Its clearly an opinion piece on a NYT article.

So I guess Daily Kos doesn't count as a "source" by your logic either, right?

Typical prog debating about the wrapping instead of the content.


I never use Daily Kos as a news source.

So how is stephanie linking this somehow quoting a "news source"?

answer my first question.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...
After dimwits took control of congress and screwed things up.
 
For some reason, Staph-knee needs to be told what to think and how to feel from her so called news sources.

Your "HotAir" (an appropriate name) source has been disqualified as news, starting from the first sentence.

"You already knew that Mitt Romney was right about just about everything."

Unexpectedly The New York Times discovers that many don t have to work in the age of Obama Hot Air

Why is HotAir telling you what you know?

A real news article leaves out bias and opinion. An actual NEWS story is one that contains no characterizations of people or incidents. News is what happened. Bias is the spin put on it by sites like "HotAir" who want to tell you what to think about what happened, tell you what emotion you should experience according to their perception, not your own.

Why can't Staph-knee think for herself?

Rule No. 4 . When lacking a coherent and cogent counter-argument, attack the poster.

Dang - you're good at it!!
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

I bet you're silly enough to think that the financial meltdown caused by Fanny and Freddie, which was authored, operated, and defended exclusively by Democrats, had nothing to do with it. No, it has to be Bush's fault. You Leftists can lie to yourselves, but you can't lie to us. Did you see the last election?
Considering F+F's share of the market went from 75% to 25% in 2003 when when corrupt Booosh cronies like Countrywide and AIG took over, it's clear you're a brainwashed functional moron. Read something.

Of course, you fail to note WHY they took over. It was the threats of those two economic masterminds, Frank and Dodd (sounds like an ice cream flavor!) that forced them into the sub-prime market. Mitigation of risk then caused them to bundle the mortgages ... you really DO need to remember ALL of history.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

LOL you're attention span is malfunctioning.
 
Well clearly our country is not heading in the right direction. We can't have millions of able bodied people sitting around on their ass doing nothing while the rest of us work overtime to pay their bills.



Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

I bet you're silly enough to think that the financial meltdown caused by Fanny and Freddie, which was authored, operated, and defended exclusively by Democrats, had nothing to do with it. No, it has to be Bush's fault. You Leftists can lie to yourselves, but you can't lie to us. Did you see the last election?

Wow you nailed it!
 
Were we heading in the right direction when we were losing 800,000 jobs a month under Bush?

An utterly stupid question, is that supposed to be some Bush vs Obama libtard talking point or something?


22.7 million jobs created under Clinton

1.1 million under Bush

However, at the end of Bush's term, we were losing close to 800,000 jobs per month. You do the math...

I bet you're silly enough to think that the financial meltdown caused by Fanny and Freddie, which was authored, operated, and defended exclusively by Democrats, had nothing to do with it. No, it has to be Bush's fault. You Leftists can lie to yourselves, but you can't lie to us. Did you see the last election?
Considering F+F's share of the market went from 75% to 25% in 2003 when when corrupt Booosh cronies like Countrywide and AIG took over, it's clear you're a brainwashed functional moron. Read something.

Of course, you fail to note WHY they took over. It was the threats of those two economic masterminds, Frank and Dodd (sounds like an ice cream flavor!) that forced them into the sub-prime market. Mitigation of risk then caused them to bundle the mortgages ... you really DO need to remember ALL of history.
AS I said, idiot. Booosh regulators allowed toxic bs mortgages to be sold to anyone who was breathing,, rated A+, insured by AIG and others, bundled, and sold around the world. Nobody was forced into anything, Dems were filibustered and vetoed into futiliity. Bingo, another corrupt Pub world depression. You are full of total Pubcrappe, fool of the greedy idiot rich FUNCTIONAL MORON.
 

Forum List

Back
Top