What on earth are you talking about? First, "jobs gained" comes from the Current Employment Statistics (CES), while labor force data comes from the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the numbers are not comparable due to different definitions, different universe, and different time frame. And I'm not sure where you're getting "211,000 who entered the workforce". The net labor force change was 502,000 with a net change of 615,000 employed.You notice how pathological liars create their Straw Man and then just repeat their lie over and over as if it was the truth. I never said 2015 - 2000 = 17, as you well know, I said that year 2000 to year 2015 was 16 years not 15 as you stupidly claimed. And as I pointed out, someone born Jan 1 completes a FULL year at the end of each Dec 31. They celebrate the anniversary of their birth each Jan 1 which is the start of a NEW year.Don't feel bad, the left have destroyed the public education system. Understandable why you think 2015 minus 2000 = 17 and why you think someone born on Jan 1 will celebrate their birthday on Dec 31.That is probably the stupidest thing you've ever posted!No, Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31, 2000 is not one year.
Your bubble world may have 364 days, but the real world has 365.
2000 is a leap year with 366 days,
Year 2000 Calendar
But you being proud of your lack of IQ is your cross to bear, no one else's.
But keep making a fool of yourself by showing that Right-wing know-it-alls can't even read a calendar!!!
150,000 jobs gained for 211,000 who entered the work force.
Trying to spin and lie about math is hilarious.