Unemployment rates were made worse by Bush, not Obama!

[Faun]

What makes you think that's better? You already proved you can't read a chart. But that's expected from a Bush voter.

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb fuck? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid fuck you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I wrote the wrong month which was next to the month I was pointing out, so sue me dumb ass. That does not mean I cannot read a simple chart you on the other hand are incapable of doing such a task.

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb fuck? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid fuck you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

 

[Faun]

Yes, it means exactly that. If you knew how to read a chart, you would have known the unemployment rate for June, 2008, was 5.6%, not 5.8%, as you idiotically claimed. And why on Earth would I sue you for being a dumb fuck? You're a Bush voter, it's expected.

You're a stupid fuck you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

LMAO!

You don't know how it is, gramps. Let me remind you ... you think July is June and you think a labor force participation rate chart is a labor force chart. How many times do you need to demonstrate you're too Bushed in the head to read a simple chart?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You're a stupid fuck you do realize this don't you? You are incapable of comprehending the simplest of charts

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

LMAO!

You don't know how it is, gramps. Let me remind you ... you think July is June and you think a labor force participation rate chart is a labor force chart. How many times do you need to demonstrate you're too Bushed in the head to read a simple chart?

I told you how it is and how it's going to be you are dismissed
Go suck on obama's ass some more punk

 

[Faun]

Spits the idiot who just misread a chart and lied about another.

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

LMAO!

You don't know how it is, gramps. Let me remind you ... you think July is June and you think a labor force participation rate chart is a labor force chart. How many times do you need to demonstrate you're too Bushed in the head to read a simple chart?

I told you how it is and how it's going to be you are dismissed
Go suck on obama's ass some more punk

Poor, senile, gramps. You're not man enough to dismiss me and you're notbright enough to read a chart. Hell, you're so fucking Bushed, you think a participation rate chart is a labor force chart. You clearly don't know how to read a chart.

 

[pinqy]

Yet another lie!!!

When Bush had a fake 5.8% UE rate, the "real" rate was much higher , there were 154,469,000 in the workforce. There are 155,862,000 now.

No lies ed only you can be dumb enough to try and pull a lie off

Of course you lied. It's right there for everyone to read. You falsely claimed there were more people in the workforce then than there are now. And as the numbers prove, that is patently false.

Bull shit puck ass bitch I unlike you don't lie go fucking die.

What a nut case you are, gramps. Careful you don't pop an aneurysm!

Your nuttiness aside, yes, you did lie. You said there were more people in the workforce when Bush had 5.8% unemployment than now. That's a bald-faced lie.

Then: 154,469,000
Now: 155,862,000

I don't care how senile you are, 156 million is still more than 154 million.

Not a lot and count in margin of error and its no improvement whatsoever.

Can you walk me through the math you used to calculate the margin of error?

 

[pinqy]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now fuck off

You are showing a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people.
In July 2008 (not June) when the UE rate was 5.8%, there were 8,937,000 unemployed, 154,464 ,000 in the labor force, and a population of 233,864,000
So 8 937,000/154,464,000 = 5.8% and 154,464,000/233,864,000=66.1%

For September, unemployment was 9,262,000, labor force was 155,862,000, and population was 248,446,000
9,262,000/155,862,000=5.9% and 155,862,000/248,446,000=62.7%

The number of people in the labor force is higher, but as a percent of the population, it's lower.

"a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people"
Do you drink before you post? Do you even think before you comment to defend the fuck up in the white house?

I don't know why you think that's defending the White House. And I note that that you can't show anything wrong with my post. It's pretty clear.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Dumb ass writing june 2008 when I meant july 2008 does not mean I cannot read the chart you are incapable of understanding the difference since you have a problem reading it. and no I did not lie the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact
But do continue to openly lie.

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

LMAO!

You don't know how it is, gramps. Let me remind you ... you think July is June and you think a labor force participation rate chart is a labor force chart. How many times do you need to demonstrate you're too Bushed in the head to read a simple chart?

I told you how it is and how it's going to be you are dismissed
Go suck on obama's ass some more punk

Poor, senile, gramps. You're not man enough to dismiss me and you're notbright enough to read a chart. Hell, you're so fucking Bushed, you think a participation rate chart is a labor force chart. You clearly don't know how to read a chart.

You are truly a stupid fuck, but such is that of an obama supporter.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now fuck off

You are showing a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people.
In July 2008 (not June) when the UE rate was 5.8%, there were 8,937,000 unemployed, 154,464 ,000 in the labor force, and a population of 233,864,000
So 8 937,000/154,464,000 = 5.8% and 154,464,000/233,864,000=66.1%

For September, unemployment was 9,262,000, labor force was 155,862,000, and population was 248,446,000
9,262,000/155,862,000=5.9% and 155,862,000/248,446,000=62.7%

The number of people in the labor force is higher, but as a percent of the population, it's lower.

"a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people"
Do you drink before you post? Do you even think before you comment to defend the fuck up in the white house?

I don't know why you think that's defending the White House. And I note that that you can't show anything wrong with my post. It's pretty clear.

Thanks for pointing to your error

 

[Faun]

Holyfuckingshit!

Do you think the forum needed more evidence that you can't read a chart, Bush voter? You idiotically claim, "the chart proved that again you lack the comprehension skills to grasp that fact." ... Except you didn't post the labor force chart even though you think you did.

You're as dumb as they come, gramps.

Don't you holy fucking shit me punk I told you how it fucking was you ignorant bastard

LMAO!

You don't know how it is, gramps. Let me remind you ... you think July is June and you think a labor force participation rate chart is a labor force chart. How many times do you need to demonstrate you're too Bushed in the head to read a simple chart?

I told you how it is and how it's going to be you are dismissed
Go suck on obama's ass some more punk

Poor, senile, gramps. You're not man enough to dismiss me and you're notbright enough to read a chart. Hell, you're so fucking Bushed, you think a participation rate chart is a labor force chart. You clearly don't know how to read a chart.

You are truly a stupid fuck, but such is that of an obama supporter.

What's funny is that you have no idea how silly that is coming from a Bush voter.

 

[pinqy]

Unemployment June 2008 5.8%
2014 Sept 5.9%

now look closely
June 2008 66.1%
September 2014 62.7%

Now fuck off

You are showing a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people.
In July 2008 (not June) when the UE rate was 5.8%, there were 8,937,000 unemployed, 154,464 ,000 in the labor force, and a population of 233,864,000
So 8 937,000/154,464,000 = 5.8% and 154,464,000/233,864,000=66.1%

For September, unemployment was 9,262,000, labor force was 155,862,000, and population was 248,446,000
9,262,000/155,862,000=5.9% and 155,862,000/248,446,000=62.7%

The number of people in the labor force is higher, but as a percent of the population, it's lower.

"a larger PERCENT of th population in the labor force, not larger number of people"
Do you drink before you post? Do you even think before you comment to defend the fuck up in the white house?

I don't know why you think that's defending the White House. And I note that that you can't show anything wrong with my post. It's pretty clear.

Thanks for pointing to your error

What error?
It's really puzzling that you don't seem to understand the difference between number of people and percent.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

you can't read a chart ... "the chart proved that "

ROFLMNAO! 'THE CHART PROVED IT!'

IT WAS A CHART! ON THE INTERNET! Advanced by a SOCIALIST!

LOL!

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

 

[Faun]

you can't read a chart ... "the chart proved that "

ROFLMNAO! 'THE CHART PROVED IT!'

IT WAS A CHART! ON THE INTERNET! Advanced by a SOCIALIST!

LOL!

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

Now THAT'S funny coming from a raving lunatic who thinks the unemployment rate is over 15%.

 

[JQPublic1]

Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.

ROFLMNAO!

Sweet MOTHER that is hysterical. The Unemployment rate in the US remains well over 15%.

The International Financial Markets were crashed by the catastrophic failure of socialist policy, wherein Leftists in the US Legislature coerced the US lending markets to set aside sound, actuarial lending principle, and replaced with an irrational notion of "FAIRNESS", in the name of the great unfairness, OKA: Socialist Justice.

This treachery occurred over the latter decades of the 20th, finally culminating in the last half of the first decade of the 21st Century, in what will forever be known as The Greatest Depression.

The above post is a lie, known to the individual bringing it as Deceit, despite their claiming it as truth, advanced through Fraudulent means, for the purpose of influencing the Ignorant.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Three Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

Oh, brother! Another ignoramus who failed to read the posts made subsequent to the initial op. LINK please! Your bad breath isn't credible evidence of anything except the need for a better mouthwash!

 

[JQPublic1]

Aww, poor, Bush voter ...

es·ti·mate

1 : the act of appraising or valuing : calculation 2 : an opinion or judgment of the nature, character, or quality of a person or thing <had a high estimate of his abilities> 3 a : a rough or approximate calculation b : a numerical value obtained from a statistical sample and assigned to a population parameter

But it wasnt even a rough estimate. It was simply a lie.

Now you want us to believe that a United States President is going to stand up there ,knowing the political consequences of lying, and undermine his chances of being a two-termer? Nah! Obama was just given the wrong information. Or, he expected the GOP to keep the promise of more jobs if the tax cuts for the
Wealthy stayed in place.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.
Yeah, tell me about it.


So if Obama got the wrong information, who got fired? I mean it isnt like there is one guy giving him advice or information. It goes through many hands before ending up on his desk and they discuss it etc.
As for the GOP, the Dems controlled both Houses of Congress. The GOP was powerless to stop anything.

If I remember correctly Obama kept a number of Republicans in his administration. His naivete showed when he allowed the GOP to take advantage of his desire for bipartisanship. While he may have intended to keep his enemies close so he could keep his eye on them, it is clear now that their designs were to undermine his presidency from the start.

I notice you keep avoiding the fact that the tax cuts for the rich and the GOPs promise of job creation
may have had a deeper impact on Obama's thinking than you care to admit.

That's like totally irrelevent. A complete non response. And of course wrong.
The Republicans kept were Gates at Defense. There wasnt a single Republican on his economic team. So that's a lie.
Obama never allowed the GOP to take any advantage at all. His porkulus bill passed with very few GOP votes,none on the House as I recall. So that's a lie
There wwere no "tax cuts for the rich." That meme is old and discredited. There were tax cuts across the board. Tax cuts Democrats voted to extend.
You have no idea what Obama's thinking was. You're making shit up.
IOW, another total fraud of a posting from someone who doesnt know his ass from a hole i the ground.

Your credibility sucks around here. With the shreds of your last argument hanging off your ass like toilet paper, I wouldn't get too cocky just yet! Gimme a link to all that BS above or STFU!

 

[The Rabbi]

But it wasnt even a rough estimate. It was simply a lie.

Now you want us to believe that a United States President is going to stand up there ,knowing the political consequences of lying, and undermine his chances of being a two-termer? Nah! Obama was just given the wrong information. Or, he expected the GOP to keep the promise of more jobs if the tax cuts for the
Wealthy stayed in place.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.
Yeah, tell me about it.


So if Obama got the wrong information, who got fired? I mean it isnt like there is one guy giving him advice or information. It goes through many hands before ending up on his desk and they discuss it etc.
As for the GOP, the Dems controlled both Houses of Congress. The GOP was powerless to stop anything.

If I remember correctly Obama kept a number of Republicans in his administration. His naivete showed when he allowed the GOP to take advantage of his desire for bipartisanship. While he may have intended to keep his enemies close so he could keep his eye on them, it is clear now that their designs were to undermine his presidency from the start.

I notice you keep avoiding the fact that the tax cuts for the rich and the GOPs promise of job creation
may have had a deeper impact on Obama's thinking than you care to admit.

That's like totally irrelevent. A complete non response. And of course wrong.
The Republicans kept were Gates at Defense. There wasnt a single Republican on his economic team. So that's a lie.
Obama never allowed the GOP to take any advantage at all. His porkulus bill passed with very few GOP votes,none on the House as I recall. So that's a lie
There wwere no "tax cuts for the rich." That meme is old and discredited. There were tax cuts across the board. Tax cuts Democrats voted to extend.
You have no idea what Obama's thinking was. You're making shit up.
IOW, another total fraud of a posting from someone who doesnt know his ass from a hole i the ground.

Your credibility sucks around here. With the shreds of your last argument hanging off your ass like toilet paper, I wouldn't get too cocky just yet! Gimme a link to all that BS above or STFU!

"Your credibility sucks" = You're eating my lunch.
All of that is well founded and you can use Google like any adult with two brain cells. Show me the Republicans among Obama's economic advisors. Show me the Republicans he held over besides Gates. There arent any.
You're just sore because you don't know jack shit about what you're talking about.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.

ROFLMNAO!

Sweet MOTHER that is hysterical. The Unemployment rate in the US remains well over 15%.

The International Financial Markets were crashed by the catastrophic failure of socialist policy, wherein Leftists in the US Legislature coerced the US lending markets to set aside sound, actuarial lending principle, and replaced with an irrational notion of "FAIRNESS", in the name of the great unfairness, OKA: Socialist Justice.

This treachery occurred over the latter decades of the 20th, finally culminating in the last half of the first decade of the 21st Century, in what will forever be known as The Greatest Depression.

The above post is a lie, known to the individual bringing it as Deceit, despite their claiming it as truth, advanced through Fraudulent means, for the purpose of influencing the Ignorant.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Three Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

Oh, brother! Another ignoramus who failed to read the posts made subsequent to the initial op. LINK please! Your bad breath isn't credible evidence of anything except the need for a better mouthwash!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

But it wasnt even a rough estimate. It was simply a lie.

Now you want us to believe that a United States President is going to stand up there ,knowing the political consequences of lying, and undermine his chances of being a two-termer? Nah! Obama was just given the wrong information. Or, he expected the GOP to keep the promise of more jobs if the tax cuts for the
Wealthy stayed in place.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.
Yeah, tell me about it.


So if Obama got the wrong information, who got fired? I mean it isnt like there is one guy giving him advice or information. It goes through many hands before ending up on his desk and they discuss it etc.
As for the GOP, the Dems controlled both Houses of Congress. The GOP was powerless to stop anything.

If I remember correctly Obama kept a number of Republicans in his administration. His naivete showed when he allowed the GOP to take advantage of his desire for bipartisanship. While he may have intended to keep his enemies close so he could keep his eye on them, it is clear now that their designs were to undermine his presidency from the start.

I notice you keep avoiding the fact that the tax cuts for the rich and the GOPs promise of job creation
may have had a deeper impact on Obama's thinking than you care to admit.

That's like totally irrelevent. A complete non response. And of course wrong.
The Republicans kept were Gates at Defense. There wasnt a single Republican on his economic team. So that's a lie.
Obama never allowed the GOP to take any advantage at all. His porkulus bill passed with very few GOP votes,none on the House as I recall. So that's a lie
There wwere no "tax cuts for the rich." That meme is old and discredited. There were tax cuts across the board. Tax cuts Democrats voted to extend.
You have no idea what Obama's thinking was. You're making shit up.
IOW, another total fraud of a posting from someone who doesnt know his ass from a hole i the ground.

Your credibility sucks around here. With the shreds of your last argument hanging off your ass like toilet paper, I wouldn't get too cocky just yet! Gimme a link to all that BS above or STFU!

An imbecile, who posts abject lies, speaks of 'credibility'...

ROFLMNAO! Hysterical... .

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

 

[JQPublic1]

Now you want us to believe that a United States President is going to stand up there ,knowing the political consequences of lying, and undermine his chances of being a two-termer? Nah! Obama was just given the wrong information. Or, he expected the GOP to keep the promise of more jobs if the tax cuts for the
Wealthy stayed in place.

If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.
Yeah, tell me about it.


So if Obama got the wrong information, who got fired? I mean it isnt like there is one guy giving him advice or information. It goes through many hands before ending up on his desk and they discuss it etc.
As for the GOP, the Dems controlled both Houses of Congress. The GOP was powerless to stop anything.

If I remember correctly Obama kept a number of Republicans in his administration. His naivete showed when he allowed the GOP to take advantage of his desire for bipartisanship. While he may have intended to keep his enemies close so he could keep his eye on them, it is clear now that their designs were to undermine his presidency from the start.

I notice you keep avoiding the fact that the tax cuts for the rich and the GOPs promise of job creation
may have had a deeper impact on Obama's thinking than you care to admit.

That's like totally irrelevent. A complete non response. And of course wrong.
The Republicans kept were Gates at Defense. There wasnt a single Republican on his economic team. So that's a lie.
Obama never allowed the GOP to take any advantage at all. His porkulus bill passed with very few GOP votes,none on the House as I recall. So that's a lie
There wwere no "tax cuts for the rich." That meme is old and discredited. There were tax cuts across the board. Tax cuts Democrats voted to extend.
You have no idea what Obama's thinking was. You're making shit up.
IOW, another total fraud of a posting from someone who doesnt know his ass from a hole i the ground.

Your credibility sucks around here. With the shreds of your last argument hanging off your ass like toilet paper, I wouldn't get too cocky just yet! Gimme a link to all that BS above or STFU!

"Your credibility sucks" = You're eating my lunch.
All of that is well founded and you can use Google like any adult with two brain cells. Show me the Republicans among Obama's economic advisors. Show me the Republicans he held over besides Gates. There arent any.
You're just sore because you don't know jack shit about what you're talking about.

Wild goose chasing is not my bag. Besides, I said " if I remember correctly" before I made my statement concerning republicans he kept on as part of his administration. But the TAX CUTS for the job creator's theme was central to Romney's strategy and it punctuated his campaign repeatedly. That was on live TV. Care to dispute that? Don't make me humiliate you...I will!

 

[JQPublic1]

Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.

ROFLMNAO!

Sweet MOTHER that is hysterical. The Unemployment rate in the US remains well over 15%.

The International Financial Markets were crashed by the catastrophic failure of socialist policy, wherein Leftists in the US Legislature coerced the US lending markets to set aside sound, actuarial lending principle, and replaced with an irrational notion of "FAIRNESS", in the name of the great unfairness, OKA: Socialist Justice.

This treachery occurred over the latter decades of the 20th, finally culminating in the last half of the first decade of the 21st Century, in what will forever be known as The Greatest Depression.

The above post is a lie, known to the individual bringing it as Deceit, despite their claiming it as truth, advanced through Fraudulent means, for the purpose of influencing the Ignorant.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance: The Three Fundamental Elements of Socialism.

Oh, brother! Another ignoramus who failed to read the posts made subsequent to the initial op. LINK please! Your bad breath isn't credible evidence of anything except the need for a better mouthwash!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

What concession? I just underlined your failure to read what has already been said in this thread chuckles! You are a bit late. BTW, have you ever heard of the BLS? The present 5.9% UE rate came from them. Have you a better source than that? Rush and Hannity don't count.