Unemployment on the rise under the Obama regime

Changes in tax policies for billionaires will not change the employment picture, folks.

It takes FAITH BASED THINKING to imagine that it will.

Would YOU invest in new hires if you saw no potential increase in revenues as a result of your inventment?

Of course you would not.

Well, how will getting a tax break for less than one million people substantively change the fix the American middle class is in?

It won't.

All that will happen, if we change the current tax structure, is that capital will invest more OFF SHORE where their investments can bring a better return than they can here.

This isn't an argument for less taxation or more taxation, it is an argument for a completely different approach to dealing with the problem.

Of course, some who think "we only need to tax the rich" will not work either:


Three Little Pigs: How Entitlements Will Destroy Us

Our national debt recently topped the $13 trillion mark. That amounts to nearly 90% of this country's GDP; $72,000 in debt for every household in America
Now add Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security, and Obama's 2011 budget has a $1.27 trillion deficit. It's the entitlements, stupid.

Nor can you tax your way out of debt. Eliminate all of the Bush tax cuts, including the tax cuts for low- and middle-income Americans, and you would reduce the debt by perhaps 10% — assuming you didn't cripple the economy in the process. Tax the rich? That won't get you there either. In fact, according to the Congressional Budget Office, in order to pay for all currently scheduled federal spending would require raising both the corporate tax rate and top income tax rate from their current 35% to 88%, the current 25% tax rate for middle-income workers to 63%, and the 10% tax bracket for low-income workers to 25%

There is simply no way to control our debt without getting serious about reforming entitlements.​
------------------


In the long run, correcting the tax system to reward investment and savings
would help and be part of the answer.

However, I do believe we have reached a critical mass in gov't spending. Where the best the Republicans can do is "hold the line" on the extreme spending which has failed so far.
Indeed, the spending party is over; we have a spending problem more than a tax problem.

Until the next election cycle, there is little the voters should expect and hope that we just keep the spending in check.
The gov't with spending is like a drug addict - it needs an "intervention"
 
Last edited:
Democrats took over in 2007. Look how many jobs they have destroyed!! Not only that but they racked up $Trillions wiping out millions of jobs!!!

fredgraph.png

but but look how they grew government without the money to do so!!
 
There would have been virtually no difference had McCain and Palin been elected.



There would have been virtually no difference had McCain and Palin been elected.


There would have been a huge difference.
It would have been McCain's and the republicans fault.
With this administration they accept no responsibility and the media defends them at every turn.The media is constantly attacking Republicans as if they have the power to do much of anything. :(
No doubt.

The Country does require a (certain) grace-period....to recover from another....

You people rail on and on about the wealthy and how they find tax loopholes, don't pay their "fair share", are greedy and all the other nonsense you spew.
Then when one of yours( Pelosi) gets called out you come up with some horse shit about Bush.
That doesn't even rise to the level of stupid.
 
There would have been virtually no difference had McCain and Palin been elected.


There would have been a huge difference.
It would have been McCain's and the republicans fault.
With this administration they accept no responsibility and the media defends them at every turn.The media is constantly attacking Republicans as if they have the power to do much of anything. :(
No doubt.

The Country does require a (certain) grace-period....to recover from another....

You people rail on and on about the wealthy and how they find tax loopholes, don't pay their "fair share", are greedy and all the other nonsense you spew.
Then when one of yours( Pelosi) gets called out you come up with some horse shit about Bush.
That doesn't even rise to the level of stupid.


Plus, the BIG FONT does make him look smarter
:eusa_whistle:
 
No doubt.

The Country does require a (certain) grace-period....to recover from another....

You people rail on and on about the wealthy and how they find tax loopholes, don't pay their "fair share", are greedy and all the other nonsense you spew.
Then when one of yours( Pelosi) gets called out you come up with some horse shit about Bush.
That doesn't even rise to the level of stupid.


Plus, the BIG FONT does make him look smarter
:eusa_whistle:
from this day forward, Mr.Shaman is to be referred as "big font"....
 
You people rail on and on about the wealthy and how they find tax loopholes, don't pay their "fair share", are greedy and all the other nonsense you spew.
Then when one of yours( Pelosi) gets called out you come up with some horse shit about Bush.
That doesn't even rise to the level of stupid.


Plus, the BIG FONT does make him look smarter
:eusa_whistle:
from this day forward, Mr.Shaman is to be referred as "big font"....

Comrade Big Font
:eusa_angel:
 
The only time I see the Sham-Man's posts is when people quote him.

Looking at the link he attached in his post, it's an article from 2009.
Obama had just barely begun to fuck up the job market at that time


:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top