UN exposes its hate, finally

[Lipush]

The UN has disqualified key sections of a special exhibition about Israel which present information about Zionism, Jerusalem and Arab Israelis.

Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon, who together with the NGO StandWithUs initiated the exhibition, expressed disappointment about the censorship, demanding that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon reverse the move.

"By disqualifying an exhibition about Zionism the UN is undermining the very existence of the State of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people,” said Danon. "We will not allow the UN to censor the fact that Jerusalem is Israel’s eternal capital."

The exhibition was to be opened at the UN on Monday, but in light of the censorship decision targeting Jewish heritage in the land of Israel, Danon decided to present the public with the parts of the exhibit banned by the UN.

"According to this scandalous decision, Zionism is not worthy of the UN so we are taking appropriate measures. We will make sure that these banned exhibits will be viewed by millions around the world," he promised.

UN censors pro-Israel exhibit

 

[Vagabond63]

Sounds more like the UN doesn't want to appear in favour of one side or another. This doesn't necessarily mean the UN hates Israel to my mind.

 

[cnm]

This is how you're supposed to do it...

 

[Penelope]

I concur with the UN, Jerusalem has been more Christian and Muslim for many more years than it was ever Hebrew. Zionist have no right to Jerusalem.

With the way yous ignore the UN and continuously discredit it , your not worthy of UN approval.
Most are not even interested in anything zion anyway,

 

[Phoenall]

I concur with the UN, Jerusalem has been more Christian and Muslim for many more years than it was ever Hebrew. Zionist have no right to Jerusalem.

With the way yous ignore the UN and continuously discredit it , your not worthy of UN approval.
Most are not even interested in anything zion anyway,

Even though the Jews have lived there for 4,500 years uninterrupted, built the temple mount and made it a holy place before your god was even invented. The Christians had no ties to Jerusalem at all prior to the first blood libel that blamed the Jews for murdering their god. The same god who was a wandering Rabbi preaching the Torah and other aspects of Judaism. As for the muslims they did not even claim that Jerusalem was part of islam until the hordes stole it and built a mosque on the site of the Hebrew Temple, then altered history to make it the one mo'mad visited

 

[ForeverYoung436]

This is how you're supposed to do it...

Which Muslim country was that picture taken in?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

I concur with the UN, Jerusalem has been more Christian and Muslim for many more years than it was ever Hebrew. Zionist have no right to Jerusalem.

With the way yous ignore the UN and continuously discredit it , your not worthy of UN approval.
Most are not even interested in anything zion anyway,

What a ridiculous post. Jerusalem is only important to Christianity and Islam because they copied Judaism.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

I concur with the UN, Jerusalem has been more Christian and Muslim for many more years than it was ever Hebrew. Zionist have no right to Jerusalem.

With the way yous ignore the UN and continuously discredit it , your not worthy of UN approval.
Most are not even interested in anything zion anyway,

Even though the Jews have lived there for 4,500 years uninterrupted, built the temple mount and made it a holy place before your god was even invented. The Christians had no ties to Jerusalem at all prior to the first blood libel that blamed the Jews for murdering their god. The same god who was a wandering Rabbi preaching the Torah and other aspects of Judaism. As for the muslims they did not even claim that Jerusalem was part of islam until the hordes stole it and built a mosque on the site of the Hebrew Temple, then altered history to make it the one mo'mad visited

Also, according to Christian theology, their god was destined to die to "save" the people who were Elect.

 

[Boston1]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

 

[Penelope]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

Yes Hebrews are great at myths. Judaism is a copy of Egyptian, Persian and Sumerian stories. Moses was Sargon.

Funny their biggest holiday is Hanukah, from the book of Maccabees, which they do not acknowledge as canon. Also gee whiz, Macc I and II are wrote in Greek.

 

[Boston1]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

Yes Hebrews are great at myths. Judaism is a copy of Egyptian, Persian and Sumerian stories. Moses was Sargon.

Funny their biggest holiday is Hanukah, from the book of Maccabees, which they do not acknowledge as canon. Also gee whiz, Macc I and II are wrote in Greek.

You seem to be confused again. I didn't comment on Judaic theology at all. Merely early christianity.

Oh and Paul may have claimed to be Jewish but he was most likely lying, there is virtually no evidence to support his claim. Tarsus in Paul's time is devoid of any Judiac influences, lacking even a synagogue until about 100 years later. It wasn't even annexed into Judea by the Romans at this time.

 

[Penelope]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

Yes Hebrews are great at myths. Judaism is a copy of Egyptian, Persian and Sumerian stories. Moses was Sargon.

Funny their biggest holiday is Hanukah, from the book of Maccabees, which they do not acknowledge as canon. Also gee whiz, Macc I and II are wrote in Greek.

You seem to be confused again. I didn't comment on Judaic theology at all. Merely early christianity.

Oh and Paul may have claimed to be Jewish but he was most likely lying, there is virtually no evidence to support his claim. Tarsus in Paul's time is devoid of any Judiac influences, lacking even a synagogue until about 100 years later. It wasn't even annexed into Judea by the Romans at this time.

and there is nothing to support that Hebrews have any god given right to a land they few have inhabited since 500 bc and before that they only ruled in parts of Palestine for briefs periods of time.

Also the maj of them in Palestine/Israel do not have any Levant ancestry. Just one huge lie.

 

[Penelope]

I concur with the UN, Jerusalem has been more Christian and Muslim for many more years than it was ever Hebrew. Zionist have no right to Jerusalem.

With the way yous ignore the UN and continuously discredit it , your not worthy of UN approval.
Most are not even interested in anything zion anyway,

What a ridiculous post. Jerusalem is only important to Christianity and Islam because they copied Judaism.

what happened in the 400 years between the OT and NT, lost piece of history, and only a handful of Hebrews were in Canaan, and they intermarried Canaanite women and had their children. Ezra came back from Babylon an was shocked and brought scribes back to write the torah from the Talmud. Its called the traditions of the elders. The Hebrews never had Pharisees till return from Babylon. From Malachi to Matthew =400 years. One heck of a long time.

 

[Boston1]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

Yes Hebrews are great at myths. Judaism is a copy of Egyptian, Persian and Sumerian stories. Moses was Sargon.

Funny their biggest holiday is Hanukah, from the book of Maccabees, which they do not acknowledge as canon. Also gee whiz, Macc I and II are wrote in Greek.

You seem to be confused again. I didn't comment on Judaic theology at all. Merely early christianity.

Oh and Paul may have claimed to be Jewish but he was most likely lying, there is virtually no evidence to support his claim. Tarsus in Paul's time is devoid of any Judiac influences, lacking even a synagogue until about 100 years later. It wasn't even annexed into Judea by the Romans at this time.

and there is nothing to support that Hebrews have any god given right to a land they few have inhabited since 500 bc and before that they only ruled in parts of Palestine for briefs periods of time.

Also the maj of them in Palestine/Israel do not have any Levant ancestry. Just one huge lie.

Again you seem confused, I never mentioned any god given right. Pretty sure we were discussing the UN and when you made a few false statements about christianity.

So now you are moving on to obfuscate on a new topic ?

 

[Shusha]

What a ridiculous post. Jerusalem is only important to Christianity and Islam because they copied Judaism.

Misunderstood, mistranslated, corrupted and usurped Judaism. If they had only copied it, there would be no problem.

 

[montelatici]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

More and more Christians are becoming aware of how Jews feel about them, thanks to people like you. I think most Jews would rather you keep your mouth shut.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

More and more Christians are becoming aware of how Jews feel about them, thanks to people like you. I think most Jews would rather you keep your mouth shut.

As far as I can gather, Boston is Native American and not Jewish. Why do people think that all Zionists are Jews?

 

[montelatici]

Where did I claim Boston was Jewish?

 

[Boston1]

The UN is scum. I'm not surprised at all that they are censoring history in order to coddle the Arab block interests.

Oh and the christian cult originally had many sects, some of which followed Jesus teachings. We think. There was a power struggle and Pauline Christianity won out, destroying nearly all temples records and traditions of the other sects in the riots of the late 4th century. Essentially all teachings of Jesus were lost and were replaced with a highly edited history of Paul ( second council of Nicea )

Interestingly enough Jesus never advocated abandoning Judaism and instead consistently urged his followers to obey the "law" ( which earned him praise from the Jewish leaders of his time ) We do know that the Ebionim were the family and descendants of the original Jesus cult in Jerusalem and followed Judaism closely. and we know they were among the first declared heretics by the Pauline Christians who followed mostly Hellenistic pagan beliefs.

Paul the Myth Maker anyone ?

Christianity has one seriously twisted history, but its more a conglomeration of Hellenistic beliefs than Judaic. Ritual cannibalism, Jewish, I don't think so. The legend of Inanna virtually to the letter, is not Jewish, its Sumerian all the way.. Virgin birth ? Zoroastrian.

How about a few tenants of Zoroaster who by most accounts lived sometime in the 6th century BC

• Zoroaster was born of a virgin and "immaculate conception by a ray of divine reason."
• He was baptized in a river.
• In his youth he astounded wise men with his wisdom.
• He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.
• He began his ministry at age 30.
• Zoroaster baptized with water, fire, and "holy wind."
• He cast out demons and restored the sight to a blind man.
• He taught about heaven and hell, and revealed mysteries, including resurrection, judgment, salvation and the apocalypse.
• He had a sacred cup or grail.
• He was slain.
• His religion had a eucharist.
• He was the "Word made flesh."
• Zoroaster's followers expect a "second coming" in the virgin-born Saoshyant or Savior, who is to come in 2341 CE and begin his ministry at age 30, ushering in a golden age.

Essentially Paul invented a religion out of bits and pieces of former pagan religions and duped the ignorant of his time into what amounted to a pyramid scheme in which donations to the church eventually made their way to him, of course as the church's leader. The profitability of this system was much more appealing to early Roman leaders than a faith of poverty and service to the Hebrew god advocated by the Ebionim.

Its also interesting to note that Paul never met Jesus and never wrote one scratch in Hebrew, the language of Judaism, he grew up in a town devoid of Jewish history and influences in his time. He also appears to have tried to join the Ebionim which didn't go well and was either censured for preaching BS or was abandoned on the missionary journeys. He appears to have stolen money from the church and purchased his roman citizenship. In the end Paul is the first crooked christian preacher, and the ignorant bought into it hook line and sinker.

IMHO the Romans really should have fed the lions better. ;--)

More and more Christians are becoming aware of how Jews feel about them, thanks to people like you. I think most Jews would rather you keep your mouth shut.

Don't bother Mr Young, Ole Monty seems very confused.

I'm not Jewish or christian. I'm just one Native American sticking up for first nations rights anywhere I find them

Also two things.

I don't see a lot of animosity between the Judaic people and christians.

Why would the Judaic people want to follow a pagan religion ? Pauline christianity bears no resemblance to what Jesus seems to have taught anyway so I don't see the connection. Just because Paul lied doesn't mean everyone is fooled by that nonsense.

 

[montelatici]

You are not a native american Boston, who do you think you are fooling.
As I said, I doubt most Jews appreciate you slandering Christians on their behalf.

If you were for first nations rights, you would support the native people of Palestine, not the European colonists from Europe, as most native americans do.

"Native American Studies Group Joins Israel Boycott

The elected council for the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association has unanimously opted to support the academic boycott of Israel, making it the third U.S.-based scholarly association, after the Association for Asian American Studies and the American Studies Association, to do so."


Native American Studies Group Joins Israel Boycott | Inside Higher Ed