U.S. weighs special forces in Syria, helicopters in Iraq

Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."


The Libertarian Plan is simple QUIT MEDDLING IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.
Yep. That's always been their plan.

But what's the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we don't like it"?
Why do Republicans need a plan? What troops are they in command of? You know Obama is Commander in Chief, right? This is his responsibility. and he's fucked it up. We've gone 2 years without a coherent workable strategy, despite his saying he was developing a coherent workable strategy.
Now he looks like a bumbling fool, having to walk back his comments on boots on the ground and on Assad.
 
Wonder how the Liberals are going to act with this news?? will they kiss up to him and say he is the greatest or turn on him like they did Bush even though liberals , including Hillary Clinton said Saddam had those weapons.. Supposed to announce at 1230 today
You think by now our federal government would have learned their lesson, we have no business being over there.
Let them bat sh!t crazy Muslims just kill each other, I know tribal there is no rhyme or reason to it. Everything is situational that being they change sides depending on the situation...
 
Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."

Well, considering he's never been right about anything, well, that's a no-brainer.
It's the coward's way out to watch the other guy fumble around while never offering a plan yourself. Any jackass can criticize the other guy's plan. It takes guts to put a plan on the table.

And history will tell if Obama has been wrong about everything, not you.

Look, president Dickweed helped create this fucking mess... it's just hilarious watching all the Bush bashers now howling in unison to Obama sending troops into Syria.

You're all a bunch of cowards and hypocrites. This guy is one disaster after another... domestic and foreign. No need to wait for history, it's readily apparent to anyone who bothers to take their Obama goggles off.
 
Obama is just tired of looking like a pussy.
Fuckin war monger :lol:

we forced the issue-----we manipulated him to SEND IN THE TROOPS-----
we is stupid
We are partly responsible for IS, IMO. Our decades of insane foreign policy..

of course------EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED in history. I am not at
all impressed with that level of BS ISIS is islam ----and was ISLAM
long before "we" existed -------I am assuming by "we" you mean the USA
 
Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."

Well, considering he's never been right about anything, well, that's a no-brainer.
It's the coward's way out to watch the other guy fumble around while never offering a plan yourself. Any jackass can criticize the other guy's plan. It takes guts to put a plan on the table.

And history will tell if Obama has been wrong about everything, not you.

Look, president Dickweed helped create this fucking mess... it's just hilarious watching all the Bush bashers now howling in unison to Obama sending troops into Syria.

You're all a bunch of cowards and hypocrites. This guy is one disaster after another... domestic and foreign. No need to wait for history, it's readily apparent to anyone who bothers to take their Obama goggles off.
I'm still not hearing a plan...
 
Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."

Well, considering he's never been right about anything, well, that's a no-brainer.
It's the coward's way out to watch the other guy fumble around while never offering a plan yourself. Any jackass can criticize the other guy's plan. It takes guts to put a plan on the table.

And history will tell if Obama has been wrong about everything, not you.

Look, president Dickweed helped create this fucking mess... it's just hilarious watching all the Bush bashers now howling in unison to Obama sending troops into Syria.

You're all a bunch of cowards and hypocrites. This guy is one disaster after another... domestic and foreign. No need to wait for history, it's readily apparent to anyone who bothers to take their Obama goggles off.
I'm still not hearing a plan...
No so called progressive plan can ever work when your dealing with bat sh!t crazy, bomb, baby, bomb... Just let Russia do it on their dime.
Remember we are broke, we are relegated to paying debt with more debt...
 
Didn't we already have a Special Forces hero killed in Syria? The question is how long Barry Hussein can pull the wool over the eyes of his ignorant base?
 
No one has yet defined the problem. So how can there be a solution.

I will define the problem-------The problem in Syria is BAATHISM. Baathism
is an ultra-nationalistic of the arab hue ---ideology -----which is
"REVOLUTIONARY" in the sense that its proposed agenda is a rejection
of the OLD RULERSHIP AND CAPITALIST OLIGARCHY type thing that
ruled -----according to Baathists----it is socialist and intensely arab nationalist---
which is supposed to lead to an entirely ARAB -----levant with mutual help and
understanding and copperative military------it claims itself "secular"---despite
the fact that "ARAB CULTURE" is must not only be dominant but-----THE ONLY WAY TO GO. Based on the concept of "revolution" and "socialist" it has
had the support of Russia since its inception. Prominent examples of Baathists
have been Gamel Abdul Nasser and Saddam Hussein and Papa and Baby
Assad. Baathism is a totalitarian utopian ideology and-----genocidal
 
Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."
Muslims have reason to them, let them kill each other off.
The world does not have a Muslim problem, it has an Arab problem.

It's a sad truth that much of the Arab world is about four centuries behind the developed world when it comes to separation of Church (Mosque) and State and some basic human rights.

It took a lot of bloodshed for the West to cast off its barbarity, and it will take a lot of bloodshed for the Arab world to catch up.

And that blood should not be ours.
 
Still waiting to hear the Republican plan other than, "Whatever Obama does, we're against that."
Muslims have reason to them, let them kill each other off.
The world does not have a Muslim problem, it has an Arab problem.

It's a sad truth that much of the Arab world is about four centuries behind the developed world when it comes to separation of Church (Mosque) and State and some basic human rights.

That doesn't mean it will take them four centuries to catch up, but it will take a lot of bloodshed. And that blood should not be ours.
The fact is the Muslim cult is the most violent "religion" the planet has ever known, and it's only getting worse.
 
No one has yet defined the problem. So how can there be a solution.
We don't need to be involved with a solution. Let them kill one another.



Correct.


Unfortunately, the entities which seek to topple Assad are close US allies : Israhell and Saudi Arabia.

contum---------where is the arena of war between Syria and Saudi arabia?



Punishing Assad and friends


Proponents of this theory point to a Sept. 11 meeting between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Saudi King Abdullah at his palace on the Red Sea. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, it was during that meeting that a deal was hammered out between Kerry and Abdullah. In it, the Saudis would support Syrian airstrikes against Islamic State (ISIS), in exchange for Washington backing the Saudis in toppling Assad.

If in fact a deal was struck, it would make sense, considering the long-simmering rivalry between Saudi Arabia and its chief rival in the region: Iran. By opposing Syria, Abdullah grabs the opportunity to strike a blow against Iran, which he sees as a powerful regional rival due to its nuclear ambitions, its support for militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah, and its alliance with Syria, which it provides with weapons and funding. The two nations are also divided by religion, with the majority of Saudis following the Sunni version of Islam, and most Iranians considering themselves Shi’ites.

“The conflict is now a full-blown proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which is playing out across the region,” Reuters reported on Dec. 15. “Both sides increasingly see their rivalry as a winner-take-all conflict: if the Shi’ite Hezbollah gains an upper hand in Lebanon, then the Sunnis of Lebanon—and by extension, their Saudi patrons—lose a round to Iran. If a Shi’ite-led government solidifies its control of Iraq, then Iran will have won another round.”

The Saudis know the Iranians are vulnerable on the oil price. Experts say the country needs $140 a barrel oil to balance its budget; at sub-$60 prices, the Saudis succeed in pressuring Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamanei, possibly containing its nuclear ambitions and making the country more pliable to the West, which has the power to reduce or lift sanctions if Iran cooperates.

Adding credence to this theory, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani told a Cabinet meeting earlier this month that the fall in oil prices was “politically motivated” and a “conspiracy against the interests of the region, the Muslim people and the Muslim world.”
 
No one has yet defined the problem. So how can there be a solution.

I will define the problem-------The problem in Syria is BAATHISM. Baathism
is an ultra-nationalistic of the arab hue ---ideology -----which is
"REVOLUTIONARY" in the sense that its proposed agenda is a rejection
of the OLD RULERSHIP AND CAPITALIST OLIGARCHY type thing that
ruled -----according to Baathists----it is socialist and intensely arab nationalist---
which is supposed to lead to an entirely ARAB -----levant with mutual help and
understanding and copperative military------it claims itself "secular"---despite
the fact that "ARAB CULTURE" is must not only be dominant but-----THE ONLY WAY TO GO. Based on the concept of "revolution" and "socialist" it has
had the support of Russia since its inception. Prominent examples of Baathists
have been Gamel Abdul Nasser and Saddam Hussein and Papa and Baby
Assad. Baathism is a totalitarian utopian ideology and-----genocidal
You have defined part of the problem in parts of Syria. What about Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Egypt, Palestine Etc?
 
When pressed for WHY exactly the United States of America should send in special forces to Syria, the President had two answers:

"What about the BAAAAAAABIES?" he asked rhetorically.

Then, offering his grave and concerned look,

obamalaughing.jpg

the President sagaciously noted that if we don't intervene NOW, as in immediately, there could be this whole

DOMINO effect.
 

Forum List

Back
Top