- Moderator
- #341
The First Amendment ~ Freedom FROM religion, is not up for popular vote.I would think an issue like this should be left up to the state...and maybe even the local governments to decide. If the people of that area want the Ten Commandments displayed, then they should be allowed to.
Separation of Church & State only goes so far in terms of the United States not having an "official religion" imo
If not, then what will they rule to be unconstitutional next? The pledge of allegiance? "One Nation Under God
.."? Our currency " In God We Trust".?
Etc.
The first amendment doesn't state freedom FROM religion.
It states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
Basically means Congress won't make a law forcing people to follow a certain religion nor will they make a law that prohibits people from following a certain religion.
How is displaying the Ten Commandments forcing people to follow a religion?
Displayed on gov'ty property? The first four commandments require that only Judaism or Christianity be followed.
I believe there are also other historical laws on display there...not just the Ten Commandments. It's a about context. In the context in which they are displayed, they are not forcing anyone to follow any religion.
Like I said earlier, the first ammendment states that the federal government won't make any laws to establish a religion or prevent people from following one. Basically means they stat out of it. Doesn't mean that the states or local governments can't "display" the Ten Commandments. In situations like this, when the federal government basically stays out of it....it leaves some leeway for state rights. I think this sort of issue should be left up to the states. If the people of that state want the Ten Commandments displayed, then they should be allowed to.
And if they ONLY want the 10 Commandments displayed?