Two Years Later: Was The 2020 Presidential Election Stolen?

Was The 2020 Presidential Election Stolen?


  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
An attempt to overthrow the United States government - as Strzok did, is an act of war - kind of defines "war,"

It's absolutely treason.

There is NO difference between Peter Strzok and Tim McVeigh - traitors who need to be put down like rabid dogs. Lisa Page can share the drip with traitor Peter. Yes, we know Obama ordered it - so maybe Pete will testify in an attempt to save his own sorry ass?
 
How is candycorn a Nazi?


Glad you asked;

Oh, first off, you should know that candycornhole is a "movie star." Back in the 1960's she did hundreds of films that were featured for a quarter in adult book stores.

But you asked how cornhole is a Nazi,

Candy has a scapegoat based on race. Whites are the new "Juden."

Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party did the same in Germany. Using a scapegoat focuses the hatred and frustration of the masses away from the rulers and toward some "other."

Candy is a collectivist, seeking control of the means of production by their Reich. Obama's Fascist Care, control of energy, etc. - along with stipends to the favored by the Reich.

Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party was also a collectivist - a fascist where all is the rightful property of the state - including the people.

Candy is a totalitarian, seeking absolute power for the democrat Reich. A California style one party rule where elections are decided long before they occur.


Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party, was also a totalitarian - and a homicidal maniac who murdered 14 million people. Of course the democrats are all "hold my beer" on the 14 million..

Candy supplants civil rights with group privilege. What privilege you have depends on what group you are in. Black may say "niqqer," whites will be imprisoned or killed if they do. "rights" depend on skin color in that case. But groups like "trans," "muslim," "gay," et al. are provided with special privilege based on their superior status with the Reich.
 
Glad you asked;

Oh, first off, you should know that candycornhole is a "movie star." Back in the 1960's she did hundreds of films that were featured for a quarter in adult book stores.

But you asked how cornhole is a Nazi,

Candy has a scapegoat based on race. Whites are the new "Juden."

Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party did the same in Germany. Using a scapegoat focuses the hatred and frustration of the masses away from the rulers and toward some "other."

Candy is a collectivist, seeking control of the means of production by their Reich. Obama's Fascist Care, control of energy, etc. - along with stipends to the favored by the Reich.

Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party was also a collectivist - a fascist where all is the rightful property of the state - including the people.

Candy is a totalitarian, seeking absolute power for the democrat Reich. A California style one party rule where elections are decided long before they occur.


Adolf Hitler - the father of the modern democrat party, was also a totalitarian - and a homicidal maniac who murdered 14 million people. Of course the democrats are all "hold my beer" on the 14 million..

Candy supplants civil rights with group privilege. What privilege you have depends on what group you are in. Black may say "niqqer," whites will be imprisoned or killed if they do. "rights" depend on skin color in that case. But groups like "trans," "muslim," "gay," et al. are provided with special privilege based on their superior status with the Reich.

Even if everything you claim about candycorn is true twice over that doesn't make her a "Nazi"
 
Glad you asked;

Oh, first off, you should know that candycornhole is a "movie star." Back in the 1960's she did hundreds of films that were featured for a quarter in adult book stores.
In this day and age, a quarter won't even get a woman to slip a glove off.
 
Don't ask me, ask the mirror Adolph.

Oh "mirror Adolf?"

You mean this guy?

1665678601567.png


Anyone who still thinks the election was stolen is seriously mentally ill.

You got the outcome you wanted.

You'll defend the means to the death and are unconcerned with facts or evidence.

I DO note however, that you Nazis are melting down over the election integrity laws.


Say, did that Nazi twat in Pennsylvania really say she would defy the Supreme Court? If you fucking Nazis openly defy the law and the Constitution, then there is no basis for your authority.




Talk about SEDITION.

You fucking Nazis are at war with the rule of law.
 
Don't be too hard on him/her/it...she doesn't know what that word means...only that it sounds insulting so she hurls it around thinking that it makes her look better.

I don't know what the word means, you Nazi twat?

:lmao:

I've TRIED to explain fascism to you before - but let's face it - you're dumb as a pile of dogshit - just less pleasant to be around.

First off moron, Fascism is a sect of socialism. Fascism is collectivist by definition. The idea of raising taxes to increase spending by the central government is a very collectivist idea - entirely consistent with fascism.

So WHAT is fascism? To you it's Republicans and anyone who opposes your party.

You no doubt will trot our some Marxist moron spewing the big lie. But what leftist academia claims is utterly irrelevant. ONLY Benito Mussolini gets to define what Fascism is - it is his creation.

Fascism is ultimately the supremacy of the state, the concept that ALL power ultimately is the rightful domain of the central, in our case federal, government.

Mussolini was one of Vladimir Lenin's top lieutenants and deeply dedicated to the cause of socialism. But of course he was a megalomaniac and not going to play second fiddle to anyone, Il Deuce was the boss.

Mussolini set out to fix some of the deep flaws of the Bolsheviks. First was the issue of human nature. The Bolsheviks addressed this by corruption, Lenin and later Stalin made corruption a central feature of Communism, because nothing gets accomplished without the promise of reward. Graft is a poor way of managing.

Italy is the birth place of the modern market, Venice the heart of the Renaissance. Also the rise of the Guilds. The Marxists in academia like to lie and claim that Fascism is "corporatist" - whatever the fuck that means. But in reality Mussolini followed the guild structure.

Surprisingly, Wikipedia does a good job of explaining how these guilds under Il Deuce were nothing like a modern corporation.


{
A fascist corporation is a government body that brings together federations of workers and employers syndicates belonging to the same profession and branch, to regulate production in a holistic manner. Each trade union would theoretically represent its professional concerns, especially by negotiation of labour contracts and the like. It was theorized that this method could result in harmony amongst social classes.[35]

In Italy from 1922 until 1943, corporatism became influential amongst Italian nationalists led by Benito Mussolini. The Charter of Carnaro gained much popularity as the prototype of a "corporative state", having displayed much within its tenets as a guild system combining the concepts of autonomy and authority in a special synthesis.[36] Alfredo Rocco spoke of a corporative state and declared corporatist ideology in detail. Rocco would later become a member of the Italian fascist regime.[37]

Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which the economy was collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level.[38] Its supporters claimed that corporatism could better recognize or "incorporate" every divergent interest into the state organically, unlike majority-rules democracy which they said could marginalize specific interests. This total consideration was the inspiration for their use of the term "totalitarian", described without coercion (which is connoted in the modern meaning) in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism as thus:

When brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.[39]

[The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fascist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fascist State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers.[39]}

Corporatism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org


Now you are a complete idiot, a dolt, nearly Faun level stupid. Casting pearls before swine comes to mind. Yet the question of what Fascism is could no longer be ignored as you of the Nazi party continue to lie.

Ultimately the central doctrine of Fascism is supremacy of the state. This is also the central doctrine of the democrat party - that the state is supreme and individuals are irrelevant.

But democrats are not merely fascist, they are Nazis - you have embraced the scapegoat, the racist attack on a group as foundation for your power as you establish the fascist state.
 
An attempt to overthrow the United States government - as Strzok did, is an act of war - kind of defines "war,"

It's absolutely treason.

There is NO difference between Peter Strzok and Tim McVeigh - traitors who need to be put down like rabid dogs. Lisa Page can share the drip with traitor Peter. Yes, we know Obama ordered it - so maybe Pete will testify in an attempt to save his own sorry ass?

Oh? What did Strzok do to attempt to overthrow the government? You realize that would have been a crime and Trump's DoJ never charged him with any such crime.

You're sounding crazy as usual, FruitCake.
 
Oh "mirror Adolf?"

You mean this guy?

View attachment 709461



You got the outcome you wanted.

You'll defend the means to the death and are unconcerned with facts or evidence.

I DO note however, that you Nazis are melting down over the election integrity laws.


Say, did that Nazi twat in Pennsylvania really say she would defy the Supreme Court? If you fucking Nazis openly defy the law and the Constitution, then there is no basis for your authority.




Talk about SEDITION.

You fucking Nazis are at war with the rule of law.
accusing someone of being a "Nazi" is lazy debating.
 
Oh, I see.

So following the political and economic philosophy of Adolf Hitler doesn't make one a Nazi? :lmao:

You must be a democrat...
I'm Republican through and through. But I was accused of being a "Nazi" not too long ago based on nothing more than the avatar image I used to use.
 
Oh "mirror Adolf?"

You mean this guy?

View attachment 709461



You got the outcome you wanted.

You'll defend the means to the death and are unconcerned with facts or evidence.

I DO note however, that you Nazis are melting down over the election integrity laws.


Say, did that Nazi twat in Pennsylvania really say she would defy the Supreme Court? If you fucking Nazis openly defy the law and the Constitution, then there is no basis for your authority.




Talk about SEDITION.

You fucking Nazis are at war with the rule of law.
If you think using that term makes you sound any less Aryan...you're wrong Adolph.
 
I don't know what the word means, you Nazi twat?

:lmao:

I've TRIED to explain fascism to you before - but let's face it - you're dumb as a pile of dogshit - just less pleasant to be around.

First off moron, Fascism is a sect of socialism. Fascism is collectivist by definition. The idea of raising taxes to increase spending by the central government is a very collectivist idea - entirely consistent with fascism.

So WHAT is fascism? To you it's Republicans and anyone who opposes your party.

You no doubt will trot our some Marxist moron spewing the big lie. But what leftist academia claims is utterly irrelevant. ONLY Benito Mussolini gets to define what Fascism is - it is his creation.

Fascism is ultimately the supremacy of the state, the concept that ALL power ultimately is the rightful domain of the central, in our case federal, government.

Mussolini was one of Vladimir Lenin's top lieutenants and deeply dedicated to the cause of socialism. But of course he was a megalomaniac and not going to play second fiddle to anyone, Il Deuce was the boss.

Mussolini set out to fix some of the deep flaws of the Bolsheviks. First was the issue of human nature. The Bolsheviks addressed this by corruption, Lenin and later Stalin made corruption a central feature of Communism, because nothing gets accomplished without the promise of reward. Graft is a poor way of managing.

Italy is the birth place of the modern market, Venice the heart of the Renaissance. Also the rise of the Guilds. The Marxists in academia like to lie and claim that Fascism is "corporatist" - whatever the fuck that means. But in reality Mussolini followed the guild structure.

Surprisingly, Wikipedia does a good job of explaining how these guilds under Il Deuce were nothing like a modern corporation.


{
A fascist corporation is a government body that brings together federations of workers and employers syndicates belonging to the same profession and branch, to regulate production in a holistic manner. Each trade union would theoretically represent its professional concerns, especially by negotiation of labour contracts and the like. It was theorized that this method could result in harmony amongst social classes.[35]

In Italy from 1922 until 1943, corporatism became influential amongst Italian nationalists led by Benito Mussolini. The Charter of Carnaro gained much popularity as the prototype of a "corporative state", having displayed much within its tenets as a guild system combining the concepts of autonomy and authority in a special synthesis.[36] Alfredo Rocco spoke of a corporative state and declared corporatist ideology in detail. Rocco would later become a member of the Italian fascist regime.[37]

Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which the economy was collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level.[38] Its supporters claimed that corporatism could better recognize or "incorporate" every divergent interest into the state organically, unlike majority-rules democracy which they said could marginalize specific interests. This total consideration was the inspiration for their use of the term "totalitarian", described without coercion (which is connoted in the modern meaning) in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism as thus:

When brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State.[39]

[The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fascist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fascist State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers.[39]}

Corporatism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org


Now you are a complete idiot, a dolt, nearly Faun level stupid. Casting pearls before swine comes to mind. Yet the question of what Fascism is could no longer be ignored as you of the Nazi party continue to lie.

Ultimately the central doctrine of Fascism is supremacy of the state. This is also the central doctrine of the democrat party - that the state is supreme and individuals are irrelevant.

But democrats are not merely fascist, they are Nazis - you have embraced the scapegoat, the racist attack on a group as foundation for your power as you establish the fascist state.
tl; dr; dc.

If you think tossing that term around makes you sound any less Aryan...you're wrong Adolph.
 
Oh? What did Strzok do to attempt to overthrow the government?

Used a document provided by the Kremlin to try and frame the President of the United States.

He knew it was treason, his "insurance policy" if Hillary lost.

Why do you ask, fruitcake?

It's not like you're lucid enough to grasp the answer.
You realize that would have been a crime and Trump's DoJ never charged him with any such crime.

You're sounding crazy as usual, FruitCake.

Oh, the irony..
 

Forum List

Back
Top