Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here's a good place to start your search
Amateur Night.Here's a good place to start your search
how embarrassing. more people signing a petition to keep the name "Sears Tower" than your insignificant amount of Architects and Engineers petition......
It's the SEARS Tower. Petition To Save the Name!
What makes you think you're worth a direct link?no, dipshitHere's a good place to start your searchwhat "molten steel"?
i have asked MULTIPLE times for PROOF of "molten steel" but NONE of you fucking troofer morons can produce any
dont give fucking search results
i want a direct link
because you dont have oneWhat makes you think you're worth a direct link?no, dipshitHere's a good place to start your search
dont give fucking search results
i want a direct link
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
Toro:
Kindly point out all morons among the more that 300 9/11 survivors, victims, and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report found here.
Start with William Rodriguez the last person to leave the building on September 11, 2001 and who's been credited with saving many lives.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1100 feet below the airplane's impact point when they heard the sound of an explosion beneath their feet. "...the walls started cracking and everything started shaking," said Mr. Rodriguez.
Have you deduced William a nutjob or moron?
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
From the "morons"at AE 911 Truth.orgyeah, exactlywow, have you been given bad info!!!!!
you think 3 skyscrapers were PULVERIZED!!?
you can not have a serious discussion of the issues surrounding 9/11 with total morons that think like that
Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes.
Multi ton steel sections ejected laterally.
Mid air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking.
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds.
1200 foot diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found.
Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high rises.
Evidences of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower...Toro:
Kindly point out all morons among the more that 300 9/11 survivors, victims, and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report found here.
Start with William Rodriguez the last person to leave the building on September 11, 2001 and who's been credited with saving many lives.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1100 feet below the airplane's impact point when they heard the sound of an explosion beneath their feet. "...the walls started cracking and everything started shaking," said Mr. Rodriguez.
Have you deduced William a nutjob or moron?
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
When a plane slams into a building it creates a lateral force. This force is resisted by frame of the building, which transfers said force to the foundation, which then has to resist said lateral force. Not resisting said force would cause the building to "snap" at some point below the impact point as the lateral force exceeds the integrity of the building. Even if the force is resisted, one would think that such a force would impact the foundation, more than likey causing the effects you are talking about.
This of course is assuming what you are saying is true, as you link no verifiable source.
I now know two New Yorkers who watched the World Trade Centers come down first hand and up close.
They moved to a new area because of what they saw.
They say what they saw was definately explosives that brought down the World Trade Center buildings.
They seen and heard the explosives as far down as 30 floors below from where the top floors coming down.
WIlliams story changed at least twicePrior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower...Toro:
Kindly point out all morons among the more that 300 9/11 survivors, victims, and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report found here.
Start with William Rodriguez the last person to leave the building on September 11, 2001 and who's been credited with saving many lives.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1100 feet below the airplane's impact point when they heard the sound of an explosion beneath their feet. "...the walls started cracking and everything started shaking," said Mr. Rodriguez.
Have you deduced William a nutjob or moron?
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
When a plane slams into a building it creates a lateral force. This force is resisted by frame of the building, which transfers said force to the foundation, which then has to resist said lateral force. Not resisting said force would cause the building to "snap" at some point below the impact point as the lateral force exceeds the integrity of the building. Even if the force is resisted, one would think that such a force would impact the foundation, more than likey causing the effects you are talking about.
This of course is assuming what you are saying is true, as you link no verifiable source.
Define "verifiable source"
I now know two New Yorkers who watched the World Trade Centers come down first hand and up close.
They moved to a new area because of what they saw.
They say what they saw was definately explosives that brought down the World Trade Center buildings.
They seen and heard the explosives as far down as 30 floors below from where the top floors coming down.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower...Toro:
Kindly point out all morons among the more that 300 9/11 survivors, victims, and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report found here.
Start with William Rodriguez the last person to leave the building on September 11, 2001 and who's been credited with saving many lives.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1100 feet below the airplane's impact point when they heard the sound of an explosion beneath their feet. "...the walls started cracking and everything started shaking," said Mr. Rodriguez.
Have you deduced William a nutjob or moron?
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
When a plane slams into a building it creates a lateral force. This force is resisted by frame of the building, which transfers said force to the foundation, which then has to resist said lateral force. Not resisting said force would cause the building to "snap" at some point below the impact point as the lateral force exceeds the integrity of the building. Even if the force is resisted, one would think that such a force would impact the foundation, more than likey causing the effects you are talking about.
This of course is assuming what you are saying is true, as you link no verifiable source.
Define "verifiable source"
An abstract with links for Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.From the "morons"at AE 911 Truth.orgyeah, exactly
you can not have a serious discussion of the issues surrounding 9/11 with total morons that think like that
Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes.
Multi ton steel sections ejected laterally.
Mid air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking.
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds.
1200 foot diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found.
Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high rises.
Evidences of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples.
From what I have read this "pulverization" concept comes from is the result of most of the dust samples being taken further away from the collapse zone. This skews the results towards finer particles, as they can travel the farthest. Most of the concrete debris was macroscopic in nature, and fell into the collapse area. When you slam two 600 ton concrete blocks into each other as the offical collapse mechanism explains you have more than enough kinetic energy to crush the concrete and expel a portion of it sideways.
This is a good paper on the issue
http://www.911myths.com/WTCONC1.pdf
And what is "evidence" of thermite in steel samples?
While I'm not exactly clear on what "that is not how it was designed" applies to, would you agree with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth that WTC 7 a 47 story high rise that was not struck by an airplane exhibited "all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives?"How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
George
First this has nothing to do with you.
Second I would describe someone's critical thinking skills who believes that a building could not fall because "that is not how it was designed" as moronic.
An abstract with links for Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.From the "morons"at AE 911 Truth.org
Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes.
Multi ton steel sections ejected laterally.
Mid air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking.
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds.
1200 foot diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found.
Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high rises.
Evidences of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples.
From what I have read this "pulverization" concept comes from is the result of most of the dust samples being taken further away from the collapse zone. This skews the results towards finer particles, as they can travel the farthest. Most of the concrete debris was macroscopic in nature, and fell into the collapse area. When you slam two 600 ton concrete blocks into each other as the offical collapse mechanism explains you have more than enough kinetic energy to crush the concrete and expel a portion of it sideways.
This is a good paper on the issue
http://www.911myths.com/WTCONC1.pdf
And what is "evidence" of thermite in steel samples?
Toro:
Kindly point out all morons among the more that 300 9/11 survivors, victims, and family members that contradict or are critical of the 9/11 Commission Report found here.
Start with William Rodriguez the last person to leave the building on September 11, 2001 and who's been credited with saving many lives.
Prior to any airplane impact William and 14 others were in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1100 feet below the airplane's impact point when they heard the sound of an explosion beneath their feet. "...the walls started cracking and everything started shaking," said Mr. Rodriguez.
How would you characterize the critical thinking skills of those who believe two planes toppled
three steel framed skyscrapers at nearly free-fall speeds?
"Sounds of explosions at ground floor a second before the building's destruction"?
"Symmetrical 'structural failure' through the path of greatest resistance -- at free fall acceleration"?
