You have a very incompetent mouth, when it comes to foreign policy.(...)
@topic
Now, most people know this about Turkey:
It is Muslim, the rest are assumptions whereby the assumptions are defined by the views of how an assumption-making person views Muslims in general.
There is no chance a Turkish Prime Minister joins an aid mission.
If Prime MInister intends to visit Gaza, this will be done through appropriate channels: Protocoll of State-Visit and off course all preparations would be met to ensure saftey of Prime Minister.
To the folks, that believe, Turkey would be crushed in a military stand-off:
A land conflict between Israel-Turkey is impossible without Syrian participation. It is the laws of geography and a non-existant border between Israel-Turkey.
So conflict would be in air and sea.
Both airforces have air-refueling capacity, and the distances are short. No matter if the conflict would be near to Turkish or Israelian coast, it is in the reach of both Air-Forces.
Israelian Navy is a coastal guard, Turkish Navy is multiple times bigger and in the transformation period to a "Blue sea"-navy.
As such, Turkish Navy has different warships with different purpose: Anti-Air-Warfare, Multi-Role, Anti-Submarine etc...
Israel:
- 3 Corvettes
- 3 Submarines
Israeli Navy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Turkey:
- 19 Frigates
- 7 Corvettes
- 10 Submarines
Turkish Navy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If there is to be a conflict, it must be in the next coming years.
Why?
Turkish Navy is building additional war-ships that are cumulative multiple times bigger then current Israelian Navy.
- 6 state-of-the art AAW Frigates, with the tonnage of a destroyer.
TF2000 class frigate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- 12 new Corvettes
Milgem class corvette - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- 6 new Submarines
Type 214 submarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the next years, Turkish Navy will have this size, accordingly to the transformation into a "blue-sea" navy:
- 25 Frigates
- 19 Corvettes
- 16 Submarines
Israelian Navy would be sunk at first sight, probably within hours, and the various warships would at this point take their duty according to their built roles like Anti-Air-Warfare.
Off course, Turkish Navy would also apply commercial Sea Bloackade of Israel.
Welcome in the real world!
Also, people tend to believe, in a conflict, the states do only utilize existing forces.
No. Civilian capabilities are re-directed to the war-efforts, budgets are adjusted to Procurement. Industry might be switched to war-economy.
Without generous aids from the outside world, Israel can't replace its hardware at the rate it will be sunk or is being shot-down.
The procurement and replacement factor, short, the "putting new toys on battlefield"-process will be performed in a much more serious way by Turkey.
That is not a claim but follows rules of Economics -->:
Israel GDP:
$206.9 billion (2009 est.)
Economy of Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Turkey GDP:
$880.061 billion[2] (2009 est.)
Economy of Turkey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you ask me, the more the conflict widens in time, the more I would bet on Turkey. Especially when Israel relies on the seas for its commerce and Turkish Navy would apply the "I have to redirect your commercial ship to North-Cyprus for inspections"-game. The Israelis know this game, but not from this point of game-changer.
As a person who speaks also fluent German I read also German sources.
In general it can be said, that German media does not buy Israelian propaganda like US public does.
So it is: USA and Israel have a special relation on level of Public Relations.
The Israeli strategy seems to link Turkey to Radicalism, whilst this might play in US public it does not play elsewhere.
Other societies do have more knowledge of Turkey.
Ongoing Turkish contribution to world peace:
- UNMIS (UN mission in Sudan)
- UNOMIG (UN Mission in Georgia)
- ALTHEA (EU Mission in Bosnia-Hercegovina)
- KFOR (NATO Mission in Kosovo)
- ISAF (NATO Mission in Afghanistan)
- UNIFIL (UN Mission in Lebanon)
- Pirate Mission in Gulf of Aden
Turkish General Staff Official Web Site - Main Page
Independent from the question of Turkish membership in NATO, Turkey will in future contribute to peace and stability missions as a responsibility to world community.
People who say, Turkey should be kicked out of NATO have an arrogant approach that comes from nescience of world and geopolitics.
Turkey is not kicked out, Turkey might leave NATO out of own motivation in near future, which is a possibility.
Only the morons have no infos on Turkey, those kind of people just know Turkey is Muslim and reflect their assumptions based on their general view of Muslims on Turkey.
US public is certainly not world public, and US public might in future still influence US administration, but US administration looses year for year its "Washington decides, world has to follow" kind of world system.
Hail the 21st century, and hail all ascending powers in this transformation phase!!!
Now coming back to Israel-Turkey.
I can exclude military stand-off. But in this evolving 21century order, noone has the luxury to (quoting George Friedman here) make assumptions that are invalidated and were valid decades ago. World moves on.
The Israelis can't see the world of 2015, 2020.
In that near future's world, nothing in the Middle-East will be done against Turkey's interest.
By 2023, Turkey will be 10th biggest world economy as a non-resource Eurasian country,
usmb.com weak-man of West-Asia
will have consolidated economic integration with its surrounding regions. Israelians will still be sucking US cock, intriguing the US public from Washington and will mourn US's "getting things done"-capability of the 20th century.
In the world of near future, Turkey will seek support besides Washington also from other world powers, and Turkey will be a country whose support will be sought by others.
Have further fun in your blackmail rhetoric strategy, mixing some words like Terrorism/Radicalism into one soup that in end-effect will be spooned by yourself and will not take you anywhere other then a blind alley. You are just some Christo-Judeanofascists with whom the relations have to be reduced just to a neutral commercial level.
Yes because wikipedia is the most reliable source. Intereting you try to state that Israel has 6 ships, when even wikipedia states it has 85 ships. Second, Israel does its best to keep its military strength a secret. No chance wikipedia got the beat on it.
Israel is widely known, with the backing of the US, to have the largest and most advanced Navy and Air Force in the region!
Turkey has a larger GDP, that's your argument corrected. Yet you don't take into account that Turkey is a 20 fold larger country with a much larger population. The larger GDP is not a much as an advantage as you make it seem.
Don't forget Turkey is still a 3rd world country, Israel is a 1st!