Tulsi Gabbard: ‘I Don’t Support Open Borders … Without Secure Borders, We Don’t Have a Country’

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,862
400
Ah, Grass Hopper....seems only ONE so far shows any signs of sanity.....but, being a DemonRAT with that attitude means that you will never get to be the candidate nor would you be asked to be the VP running mate of a ABNORMAL nominee!

------------

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), running for the 2020 Democrat presidential nomination, says she opposes open borders and plans pushed by fellow Democrat candidates that are “essentially open borders.”

During an interview with Dave Rubin, Gabbard said that unlike some of her Democrat colleagues, she opposes open borders and the agenda to invite the world’s migrants to the United States through various incentives.

The interview went as follows:

RUBIN: So immigration, I think there’s a general sense that the candidates, the Democrats are basically trying to outdo each other for open borders, something like that … do you think that’s a fair way to start the question and … where do you sit on that?

GABBARD: I think it’s fair … I don’t, I don’t support open borders. Without secure borders, we don’t really have a country. And while some of the other Democratic candidates will say, ‘Well, open borders, that’s a conservative argument and that’s not really what’s being advocated for,’ if you look at some of the practical implications of some of the things they are pushing for, it is essentially open borders.

I think there are a few things we got to do when we’re talking about immigration reform. One is we’ve got to have secure borders. This is not Trump’s wall from sea to shining sea. It’s about seeing again what makes sense. I look at things from a practical, objective-oriented standpoint; I’m a soldier. So I look at, secure the borders, what’s our objective. In some places, it may make the most sense to have a wall or some kind of other physical barriers in place; in other places it won’t make sense. So you use technology and you use all the other tools that you have ultimately to accomplish that objective of security at the borders.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Watch "Rigged Debates, Media Smears, & Taking On The DNC | Tulsi Gabbard | POLITICS | Rubin Report" on YouTube

 
Ah, Grass Hopper....seems only ONE so far shows any signs of sanity.....but, being a DemonRAT with that attitude means that you will never get to be the candidate nor would you be asked to be the VP running mate of a ABNORMAL nominee!

------------

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), running for the 2020 Democrat presidential nomination, says she opposes open borders and plans pushed by fellow Democrat candidates that are “essentially open borders.”

During an interview with Dave Rubin, Gabbard said that unlike some of her Democrat colleagues, she opposes open borders and the agenda to invite the world’s migrants to the United States through various incentives.

The interview went as follows:

RUBIN: So immigration, I think there’s a general sense that the candidates, the Democrats are basically trying to outdo each other for open borders, something like that … do you think that’s a fair way to start the question and … where do you sit on that?

GABBARD: I think it’s fair … I don’t, I don’t support open borders. Without secure borders, we don’t really have a country. And while some of the other Democratic candidates will say, ‘Well, open borders, that’s a conservative argument and that’s not really what’s being advocated for,’ if you look at some of the practical implications of some of the things they are pushing for, it is essentially open borders.

I think there are a few things we got to do when we’re talking about immigration reform. One is we’ve got to have secure borders. This is not Trump’s wall from sea to shining sea. It’s about seeing again what makes sense. I look at things from a practical, objective-oriented standpoint; I’m a soldier. So I look at, secure the borders, what’s our objective. In some places, it may make the most sense to have a wall or some kind of other physical barriers in place; in other places it won’t make sense. So you use technology and you use all the other tools that you have ultimately to accomplish that objective of security at the borders.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Watch "Rigged Debates, Media Smears, & Taking On The DNC | Tulsi Gabbard | POLITICS | Rubin Report" on YouTube



OMG The Lawrd sent an angel to rescue the Dems from lemming themselves....

Her problem was dissing the DNC about the Bernie abuse issue back in 2016.. That sin gets you expelled from the inner circle and POSSIBLY burnt at the stake...

She is TOTALLY the only sane reasonable candidate up there -- except "whatzhizname" :abgg2q.jpg: (not biden)
 
Ah, Grass Hopper....seems only ONE so far shows any signs of sanity.....but, being a DemonRAT with that attitude means that you will never get to be the candidate nor would you be asked to be the VP running mate of a ABNORMAL nominee!

------------

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), running for the 2020 Democrat presidential nomination, says she opposes open borders and plans pushed by fellow Democrat candidates that are “essentially open borders.”

During an interview with Dave Rubin, Gabbard said that unlike some of her Democrat colleagues, she opposes open borders and the agenda to invite the world’s migrants to the United States through various incentives.

The interview went as follows:

RUBIN: So immigration, I think there’s a general sense that the candidates, the Democrats are basically trying to outdo each other for open borders, something like that … do you think that’s a fair way to start the question and … where do you sit on that?

GABBARD: I think it’s fair … I don’t, I don’t support open borders. Without secure borders, we don’t really have a country. And while some of the other Democratic candidates will say, ‘Well, open borders, that’s a conservative argument and that’s not really what’s being advocated for,’ if you look at some of the practical implications of some of the things they are pushing for, it is essentially open borders.

I think there are a few things we got to do when we’re talking about immigration reform. One is we’ve got to have secure borders. This is not Trump’s wall from sea to shining sea. It’s about seeing again what makes sense. I look at things from a practical, objective-oriented standpoint; I’m a soldier. So I look at, secure the borders, what’s our objective. In some places, it may make the most sense to have a wall or some kind of other physical barriers in place; in other places it won’t make sense. So you use technology and you use all the other tools that you have ultimately to accomplish that objective of security at the borders.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Watch "Rigged Debates, Media Smears, & Taking On The DNC | Tulsi Gabbard | POLITICS | Rubin Report" on YouTube



OMG The Lawrd sent an angel to rescue the Dems from lemming themselves....

Her problem was dissing the DNC about the Bernie abuse issue back in 2016.. That sin gets you expelled from the inner circle and POSSIBLY burnt at the stake...

She is TOTALLY the only sane reasonable candidate up there -- except "whatzhizname" :abgg2q.jpg: (not biden)

I guess there are no standards for mods here. The only traction Gabbard has ever had for the Presidency is among far right trolls. You would never vote for her.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Democrats are for open borders and like foreign nationals way more then Americans.

Democrats literally step over tent cities full of needy homeless Americans to help needy homeless foreign nationals at the expense of the needy homeless Americans.

Democrats force needy homeless Americans to compete with needy homeless foreign nationals for resources meant for them.

If a Democrat tells you they support border security and against illegal immigration, they are either totally ignorant or lying to your face.
 
Smart and logical, real world experience, real leadership qualities. She has no chance in the Democratic Party.
Yeah, no way in he'll the Socialist Progressive pro-Open Borders Leftist Extremists allow her to join and sit at the table at their 'Mad Hatter Tea Party' with Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum, the Mad Hatter, the Queen of the Cherokees, and others....

:p
 
She should defect and replace Pence.
Democrats are for sanctuary cities, open borders, and taking down the walls we have. If one tells you otherwise, they are either totally ignorant or lying to your face.

I don't believe her.

Raise your hand if you want Americans to pay for the healthcare and welfare for foreign nationals who come and go unchecked and unregulated at will...
gettyimages-1152455278.jpg
 
Smart and logical, real world experience, real leadership qualities. She has no chance in the Democratic Party.
Yeah, no way in he'll the Socialist Progressive pro-Open Borders Leftist Extremists allow her to join and sit at the table at their 'Mad Hatter Tea Party' with Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum, the Mad Hatter, the Queen of the Cherokees, and others....

:p
It’s up to the voters, no
 
Smart and logical, real world experience, real leadership qualities. She has no chance in the Democratic Party.

What does this virtue of experience and leadership have to say about Trump?

Um... that Trump has more virtue, experience, and leadership qualities, than 99% of the Democrats in this country?

You did ask man.... I'm not sure what you expected to get back, when the vast majority of Democrats are raving lunatics.
 
It’s up to the voters, no
What is up to the voters? If Gabbard gets a fair shot at getting a seat at her Party's table?

Bwuhahahaha....you aren't serious, right?

We are talking about the Socialist Democrat party whose own leaked e-mails exposed the fact that they stacked their own 2016 Primary Deck against Bernie Sanders to ensure Hillary got the nomination because it was 'her turn', 'will of the people's be Damned...

We are talking about the Socialist Democrat party whose own DNC Chairwoman publicly admitted they helped Hillary cheat in debates and acted to alter the outcome of both the 2016 DNC Primary and the 2016 Presidential election...

We are talking about the Socialist Democrat party who screwed Bernie Sanders and his supporters out of his deserved / earned nmination in 201y and who will NEVER allow a Socialist Party Member and Democrat in name only to take advantage of the Democrat Party name get their nomination....

Likewise, We are talking about the Socialist Democrat party who would / will never allow Gabbard have a seat at the table with their clown car collection of Leftist Exyremists, as their is no room under the DNC tent for anything / anyone resembling 'Moderate', 'Pro-Life', 'Pro-Border/Execution Of Existing US Border law, etc....
 
Smart and logical, real world experience, real leadership qualities. She has no chance in the Democratic Party.

What does this virtue of experience and leadership have to say about Trump?

Um... that Trump has more virtue, experience, and leadership qualities, than 99% of the Democrats in this country?

You did ask man.... I'm not sure what you expected to get back, when the vast majority of Democrats are raving lunatics.
Trump is a way better person then any Democrat. When he has an affair he uses his own money to buy NDAs.

Democrats use tax dollars to buy NDAs to cover for sex crimes of Democrats and the average Democrat gives everyone involved a total pass.

If you take a Democrat seriously, you will look hella stupid.
 
Smart and logical, real world experience, real leadership qualities. She has no chance in the Democratic Party.

What does this virtue of experience and leadership have to say about Trump?

Um... that Trump has more virtue, experience, and leadership qualities, than 99% of the Democrats in this country?

You did ask man.... I'm not sure what you expected to get back, when the vast majority of Democrats are raving lunatics.


Obviously I'm referring to Gabbard's views on Trump, are you not paying attention?
 
Gabbard is the closest thing the Democratic Party had / has to a sane, intelligent, reasonable, pro-American, non-Socialist Democrat extremists who is not overtly criminal, anti-Semitic, or senile... Again, she has no shot at getting a seat at the Party Table....
 
Gabbard is the closest thing the Democratic Party had / has to a sane, intelligent, reasonable, pro-American, non-Socialist Democrat extremists who is not overtly criminal, anti-Semitic, or senile... Again, she has no shot at getting a seat at the Party Table....
I don't buy it. It's an act. There is no such thing as a pro American Democrat. Their party platform is all about how evil America is and how they want to fundamentally transform it into a global socialist police state run by oligarchs out of Europe.
 
Gabbard is the closest thing the Democratic Party had / has to a sane, intelligent, reasonable, pro-American, non-Socialist Democrat extremists who is not overtly criminal, anti-Semitic, or senile... Again, she has no shot at getting a seat at the Party Table....
I don't buy it. It's an act. There is no such thing as a pro American Democrat. Their party platform is all about how evil America is and how they want to fundamentally transform it into a global socialist police state run by oligarchs out of Europe.
That's why I stated Gabbard is / was the CLOSEST THING the Democrats have to that....

:p
 

Forum List

Back
Top