Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I really do feel bad for the dog...................
Sorry dog, you didn't get to vote for the family you wanted. No ID, huh?
Blues
From your link:
No, she doesn't.
Do you read your own ARTICLES?
In 2005, Indiana enacted the nation's stiffest photo ID law. Yet turnout increased 2% in November compared with 2002, the previous non-presidential federal election year.
Teamster Nation: Walker cuts DMV in Dem districts now that voter ID is passed
the plan to keep democratic voters from voting is steaming along
No, she doesn't.
Do you read your own ARTICLES?
In 2005, Indiana enacted the nation's stiffest photo ID law. Yet turnout increased 2% in November compared with 2002, the previous non-presidential federal election year.
She tried this link the last time this bug in her butt was acting up and the same thing was pointed out to her.
And, yes, she really IS that dense.
ID laws keep people from voting.
State IDs are free, idiot, so the 'poll tax' whine is irrelevant.http://law.du.edu/documents/denver-university-law-review/v86-3/Ellis.pdf
THE COST OF THE VOTE: POLL TAXES,
VOTER IDENTIFICATION LAWS, AND THE PRICE OF
DEMOCRACY
ATIBA R. ELLIS
The commission's chairwoman, Donetta Davidson, called the study "premature." More work needs to be done, she said. "You can't make determinations based on one year," she said. "We have new states that have ID requirements now that weren't in that review."
In 2005, Indiana enacted the nation's stiffest photo ID law. Yet turnout increased 2% in November compared with 2002, the previous non-presidential federal election year.
In local races before the November elections, "we could not find one instance where a legitimate voter could not vote," said Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita, a Republican.
Why are they fought by Democrats?Why is it these laws are ONLY implimented by republicans?