Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I just told you. One was no older than 10. The girl appears to be around 13.How old are the cast members?
Again it is not a children's show it is for young adult and adults. It is not targeted to those under 18...
And a girl at thirteen should not know what a hymen is?
+ a boy no older than 10...you keep leaving that part out. And no, the 13 year old should not receive sexualized education without direct oversight by her parents in the controlled setting at her school; not on TV.
But again, that content is not appropriate without parental pre-authorization and very proximate oversight. It has no place in "educational programming" pitched to kids, with children as the target "learners" featured in the episodes.There was no sex ed on the description of a hymen...There was no sex what so ever...There was no identifying ideology. They were nothing crude, exploitative or crass..It was like an anatomy class for dummies..With no pictures of a vagina or a hymen...
I am sure their parents knew damn good a well what their children were performing in(yet you do not know for a fact their real ages)..As far as the target audience, you're still dead wrong..And what exactly is my cult or my kind? You don't know but my eldest son is a minister?I just told you. One was no older than 10. The girl appears to be around 13.How old are the cast members?
Again it is not a children's show it is for young adult and adults. It is not targeted to those under 18...And a girl at thirteen should not know what a hymen is?+ a boy no older than 10...you keep leaving that part out. And no, the 13 year old should not receive sexualized education without direct oversight by her parents in the controlled setting at her school; not on TV.But again, that content is not appropriate without parental pre-authorization and very proximate oversight. It has no place in "educational programming" pitched to kids, with children as the target "learners" featured in the episodes.There was no sex ed on the description of a hymen...There was no sex what so ever...There was no identifying ideology. They were nothing crude, exploitative or crass..It was like an anatomy class for dummies..With no pictures of a vagina or a hymen...
I just told you. One was no older than 10. The girl appears to be around 13.How old are the cast members?
Again it is not a children's show it is for young adult and adults. It is not targeted to those under 18...And a girl at thirteen should not know what a hymen is?+ a boy no older than 10...you keep leaving that part out. And no, the 13 year old should not receive sexualized education without direct oversight by her parents in the controlled setting at her school; not on TV.But again, that content is not appropriate without parental pre-authorization and very proximate oversight. It has no place in "educational programming" pitched to kids, with children as the target "learners" featured in the episodes.There was no sex ed on the description of a hymen...There was no sex what so ever...There was no identifying ideology. They were nothing crude, exploitative or crass..It was like an anatomy class for dummies..With no pictures of a vagina or a hymen...
I am sure their parents knew damn good a well what their children were performing in(yet you do not know for a fact their real ages)..As far as the target audience, you're still dead wrong..And what exactly is my cult or my kind? You don't know but my eldest son is a minister?
Specifics, what was said and done? Your allegations hold no weight without it...So far you have produced nothing from the show to prove your allegations...I just told you. One was no older than 10. The girl appears to be around 13.How old are the cast members?
Again it is not a children's show it is for young adult and adults. It is not targeted to those under 18...And a girl at thirteen should not know what a hymen is?+ a boy no older than 10...you keep leaving that part out. And no, the 13 year old should not receive sexualized education without direct oversight by her parents in the controlled setting at her school; not on TV.But again, that content is not appropriate without parental pre-authorization and very proximate oversight. It has no place in "educational programming" pitched to kids, with children as the target "learners" featured in the episodes.There was no sex ed on the description of a hymen...There was no sex what so ever...There was no identifying ideology. They were nothing crude, exploitative or crass..It was like an anatomy class for dummies..With no pictures of a vagina or a hymen...I am sure their parents knew damn good a well what their children were performing in(yet you do not know for a fact their real ages)..As far as the target audience, you're still dead wrong..And what exactly is my cult or my kind? You don't know but my eldest son is a minister?
Is that why Adam is talking to the kids through the whole episode and they convert their way of thinking in front of the viewers when he's done with them? Because the show is pitched to adults?
How the hell do you know what I am or am not doing...Do you have your crystal ball on high?^^ You'll have to look back to the reference in post #10....which you're pretending right now doesn't exist...
Because you just said that I gave no specifics about my claims about Adam ruins everything, it's content and who it's pitched to. So I reminded you of post #10. Now you're playing a strawman to keep readers from noticing all that. But thanks to that diversionary bullshit, I just re-watched the video in post #10 and noticed that when the erect penis shows up at the cued point, it has sparkles on it to emphasize it flashing off and on. People know what male is, so why when the show is pitched to kids with kids on the episode as "the learners" does the show insert an erect penis icon with flashers to attract the eye subliminally?How the hell do you know what I am or am not doing...Do you have your crystal ball on high?^^ You'll have to look back to the reference in post #10....which you're pretending right now doesn't exist...
It was age appropriate.. There was nothing nasty or exposing about it, unless you can't stand the word vagina, which is a proper term....The shows time slot is late night, so the so called kiddies are in bed...When will you grow up? The show's targeted audience is college age humans...Albeit kids to me...
The show is pitched specifically to children because it includes children IN THE CAST as absorbing sponges to "Adam's great wisdom". Have you not watched the actual show and seen this?
The words "vagina" or "hymen" have no place in children's entertainment programming whatsoever. They are to be introduced slowly in a controlled setting with heavy and direct parental oversight...like the health ed classes we have in place already in schools, geared to appropriate ages. Anything less than this direct and tightly-controlled proximate oversight is rife for exploitation as kiddie soft-porn masquerading on the boob tube as "educational".
Here's an episode where Adam introduces gender blending with a child cast. He cleverly uses the venue of video games to introduce the idea of gender-blending: chief tenet of the LGBT cult.
Cue to the screen image show at 2:44. Note the erect penis with testicles icon at the bottom. Familiarize yourselves with 1. Subliminal advertising and 2. The predatory nature of pedophiles "grooming" techniques.
Also cue to :05- on to hear "Adam's" direct insertion (pun intended) of the gender blending concept...pitched to a boy no older than 9 or 10; a crucial time in preadolescent-sexual development..
Since I left and picked up my son from school, changed the oil in my car and cooked dinner, how was I suppose to know? It's not like I peruse the entire thread again...Because you just said that I gave no specifics about my claims about Adam ruins everything, it's content and who it's pitched to. So I reminded you of post #10. Now you're playing a strawman to keep readers from noticing all that.How the hell do you know what I am or am not doing...Do you have your crystal ball on high?^^ You'll have to look back to the reference in post #10....which you're pretending right now doesn't exist...
Since I left and picked up my son from school, changed the oil in my car and cooked dinner, how was I suppose to know? It's not like I peruse the entire thread again...
Just makes you want to cry, when you have a life with nothing but USMB in it...Since I left and picked up my son from school, changed the oil in my car and cooked dinner, how was I suppose to know? It's not like I peruse the entire thread again...
More strawmen. Now you're "too busy", "too important", "above" looking at post #10. When you get around to looking at post #10, let me know and we can talk about it.
Since I left and picked up my son from school, changed the oil in my car and cooked dinner, how was I suppose to know? It's not like I peruse the entire thread again...
More strawmen. Now you're "too busy", "too important", "above" looking at post #10. When you get around to looking at post #10, let me know and we can talk about it.
Still avoiding post #10 eh? Let me know when you're out of strawmen and diversions and will look at post #10. I do more off the internet before 9am than you do all day. Guaranteed.Just makes you want to cry, when you have a life with nothing but USMB in it...
Yes a symbol of a key with low resolution graphics....I see you never played games during that period..
