www.yahoo.com/entertainment/donald-trumps-walk-fame-star-destroyed-dozens-new-trump-stars-appear-hollywood-blvd-014145207.html
Even though these got peeled off, some Pro Consersative Anti-PC Artists did make their statement.
If this was legal and not vandalism, that's one step better than the protests destroying the sidewalk
which resulted in arrests, charges and prosecution procedures for breaking the law (at taxpayers' expense and whoever has to pay for repairs). So far these street artists paid their own costs for their art; if they pay for any other costs incurred by their actions, that would be consistent with Conservative values of individual responsibility and not dumping on govt or taxpayers to pay for your "free speech" or right to protest.
Not sure if charges will be filed for vandalizing the sidewalk by ADDING art to it!
Had it been permanent or cost money to remove, maybe that could still incur charges.
Statement made, but if Conservatives are consistent, then if this Sidewalk is PRIVATELY owned
and the voting on adding or removal is PRIVATE then by limited govt/free choice, the govt cannot
be abused to FORCE individuals how to express themselves if they own this property. Maybe if
it is a PUBLIC sidewalk, that gets into public jurisdiction.
If a group makes public claims that count as FALSE ADVERTISING, slander, misrepresentation
or defamation of character, that can be grounds for legal action. But free speech and free choice
even by Conservative standards are not to be punished or dictated by govt. We'll see how this
"Star Wars" plays out.
Even though these got peeled off, some Pro Consersative Anti-PC Artists did make their statement.
If this was legal and not vandalism, that's one step better than the protests destroying the sidewalk
which resulted in arrests, charges and prosecution procedures for breaking the law (at taxpayers' expense and whoever has to pay for repairs). So far these street artists paid their own costs for their art; if they pay for any other costs incurred by their actions, that would be consistent with Conservative values of individual responsibility and not dumping on govt or taxpayers to pay for your "free speech" or right to protest.
Not sure if charges will be filed for vandalizing the sidewalk by ADDING art to it!
Had it been permanent or cost money to remove, maybe that could still incur charges.
Statement made, but if Conservatives are consistent, then if this Sidewalk is PRIVATELY owned
and the voting on adding or removal is PRIVATE then by limited govt/free choice, the govt cannot
be abused to FORCE individuals how to express themselves if they own this property. Maybe if
it is a PUBLIC sidewalk, that gets into public jurisdiction.
If a group makes public claims that count as FALSE ADVERTISING, slander, misrepresentation
or defamation of character, that can be grounds for legal action. But free speech and free choice
even by Conservative standards are not to be punished or dictated by govt. We'll see how this
"Star Wars" plays out.