Trump's economy is booming—repealing tariffs will boost it even more

Trump inherited a booming economy with low unemployment and steady job growth — an easy win on day one — and he quickly claimed credit. Early in his presidency, Trump boasted about job gains starting from his election onward, crediting Obama's final months as his own. Let our news meet your inbox.

Fact check: Did Trump pull off an 'economic turnaround?'

The economy was, however, struggling when Obama took office in 2009. He inherited a dismal economy in the middle of a recession that lasted 18 months, facing what many feared would be a depression, and was able to turn it around in the first years of his presidency. The U.S. is now its 10th year of economic growth, and in its longest period of growth with 95 straight months of job creation. The bulk of that decade of growth was under Obama’s presidency, and can fairly be credited to him.

Still, as Trump accurately points out, the recovery under Obama was marked by a slower rate of growth than what followed previous recessions, such as the recovery under President Ronald Reagan in 1983 and 1984.

But, what about the Trump effect?
Trump's supporters say he's supercharged the economy. Now in the second year of his presidency, he has passed a major tax bill and rolled back a significant number of regulations, giving the economy another injection of capital — though economists disagree on the how much the tax cuts will really benefit the larger economy and whether it will have lasting effects to the economy.

Trump has surely seen some impressive data points in his first term: GDP growth has reached 4.2 percent, unemployment has reached its lowest point in half a century, and the stock market has reached new heights.

The president and his administration have been eager to tout the numbers. Kevin Hassett, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, kicked off the White House press briefing on Monday with a slew of charts. He said the growth is not an extension of a trend, but rather a "clear upward trajectory, way above the trend."

Economists aren't buying it: While the tax cuts probably helped inject some cash into the economy — particularly the stock market — the country has largely maintained the growth it saw under Obama.

Fact check: Did Trump pull off an 'economic turnaround?'

12400646_1050592708330591_52695659504060855_n.jpg

Just think if Obama wasn't in favor of utilities going bankrupt, gas prices going higher, destruction of 1,400 companies that paid $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed 450,000 people. Or if Obama wanted the USA to be the biggest OIL customer for foreign oil.
Or that he approved of 1 million barrels of Canadian oil in one tanker a day on the open ocean destroying 1,000s of miles of ocean.
Or he put into a plan to make in his words utility rates skyrocket.
Or forcing small businesses for example that had 49 employees and forced when hiring the 50th to spend then because of the 50th
employee nearly $15,000/month just to hire that 50th employee. Really is that a way to reduce unemployment? As a result these small businesses hired part time employees! All of the above are FACTS.

ObamaAntiBusiness.png
 
Trump inherited a booming economy with low unemployment and steady job growth — an easy win on day one — and he quickly claimed credit. Early in his presidency, Trump boasted about job gains starting from his election onward, crediting Obama's final months as his own. Let our news meet your inbox.

Fact check: Did Trump pull off an 'economic turnaround?'

The economy was, however, struggling when Obama took office in 2009. He inherited a dismal economy in the middle of a recession that lasted 18 months, facing what many feared would be a depression, and was able to turn it around in the first years of his presidency. The U.S. is now its 10th year of economic growth, and in its longest period of growth with 95 straight months of job creation. The bulk of that decade of growth was under Obama’s presidency, and can fairly be credited to him.

Still, as Trump accurately points out, the recovery under Obama was marked by a slower rate of growth than what followed previous recessions, such as the recovery under President Ronald Reagan in 1983 and 1984.

But, what about the Trump effect?
Trump's supporters say he's supercharged the economy. Now in the second year of his presidency, he has passed a major tax bill and rolled back a significant number of regulations, giving the economy another injection of capital — though economists disagree on the how much the tax cuts will really benefit the larger economy and whether it will have lasting effects to the economy.

Trump has surely seen some impressive data points in his first term: GDP growth has reached 4.2 percent, unemployment has reached its lowest point in half a century, and the stock market has reached new heights.

The president and his administration have been eager to tout the numbers. Kevin Hassett, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, kicked off the White House press briefing on Monday with a slew of charts. He said the growth is not an extension of a trend, but rather a "clear upward trajectory, way above the trend."

Economists aren't buying it: While the tax cuts probably helped inject some cash into the economy — particularly the stock market — the country has largely maintained the growth it saw under Obama.

Fact check: Did Trump pull off an 'economic turnaround?'

12400646_1050592708330591_52695659504060855_n.jpg

Just think if Obama wasn't in favor of utilities going bankrupt, gas prices going higher, destruction of 1,400 companies that paid $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed 450,000 people. Or if Obama wanted the USA to be the biggest OIL customer for foreign oil.
Or that he approved of 1 million barrels of Canadian oil in one tanker a day on the open ocean destroying 1,000s of miles of ocean.
Or he put into a plan to make in his words utility rates skyrocket.
Or forcing small businesses for example that had 49 employees and forced when hiring the 50th to spend then because of the 50th
employee nearly $15,000/month just to hire that 50th employee. Really is that a way to reduce unemployment? As a result these small businesses hired part time employees! All of the above are FACTS.

View attachment 295795
Here, this is for you too...

Unemployment-rate-from-Obama-to-Trump.png
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.
 
... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.

Look who came up for air from sucking dick all day just to bump my thread up, Faun the Most High Idiot. You're still a clueless idiot aren't you. Thats okay. Trump created a job for you too. Now you can quit gargling gonads
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.

I clicked on your "link" and got this... so where did you get this made up statement???

Screen Shot 2019-12-20 at 3.58.18 PM.png
 
... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.

Look who came up for air from sucking dick all day just to bump my thread up, Faun the Most High Idiot. You're still a clueless idiot aren't you. Thats okay. Trump created a job for you too. Now you can quit gargling gonads

Does you husband know about your homosexual fantasies?

Does he act them out for you on other men?
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.


And you still don't seem to understand... you don't make dumb ass conclusions when the facts are in your face!
I never said the CRA was the sole cause of the collapse!
It was as your above that 6% of the all higher-priced loans WAS part of the problem.
But the mentality of people flipping houses was the problem.
Here’s something that won’t get any play in the liberal media…
A new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research found that Democrats are to blame for the subprime mortgage crisis.
Investor’s Business Daily reported:

Democrats and the media insist the Community Reinvestment Act, the anti-redlining law beefed up by President Clinton, had nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis and recession.

But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks.”

Added NBER: “There is a clear pattern of increased defaults for loans made by these banks in quarters around the (CRA) exam. Moreover, the effects are larger for loans made within CRA tracts,” or predominantly low-income and minority areas.

To satisfy CRA examiners, “flexible” lending by large banks rose an average 5% and those loans defaulted about 15% more often, the 43-page study found.

The strongest link between CRA lending and defaults took place in the runup to the crisis — 2004 to 2006 — when banks rapidly sold CRA mortgages for securitization by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Wall Street.

CRA regulations are at the core of Fannie’s and Freddie’s so-called affordable housing mission. In the early 1990s, a Democrat Congress gave HUD the authority to set and enforce (through fines) CRA-grade loan quotas at Fannie and Freddie.

It passed a law requiring the government-backed agencies to “assist insured depository institutions to meet their obligations under the (CRA).” The goal was to help banks meet lending quotas by buying their CRA loans.
New Study Finds Democrats Fully to Blame for Subprime Mortgage Crisis that Caused 2008 Financial Disaster

But they had to loosen underwriting standards to do it. And that’s what they did.
 
... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.

Look who came up for air from sucking dick all day just to bump my thread up, Faun the Most High Idiot. You're still a clueless idiot aren't you. Thats okay. Trump created a job for you too. Now you can quit gargling gonads
Poke a cultist and find a disturbed brain. Sad really.

:poke:
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.

I clicked on your "link" and got this... so where did you get this made up statement???

View attachment 295821
Made up? No

Old? Yes.

Here's an archive of it...

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.


And you still don't seem to understand... you don't make dumb ass conclusions when the facts are in your face!
I never said the CRA was the sole cause of the collapse!
It was as your above that 6% of the all higher-priced loans WAS part of the problem.
But the mentality of people flipping houses was the problem.
Here’s something that won’t get any play in the liberal media…
A new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research found that Democrats are to blame for the subprime mortgage crisis.
Investor’s Business Daily reported:

Democrats and the media insist the Community Reinvestment Act, the anti-redlining law beefed up by President Clinton, had nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis and recession.

But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks.”

Added NBER: “There is a clear pattern of increased defaults for loans made by these banks in quarters around the (CRA) exam. Moreover, the effects are larger for loans made within CRA tracts,” or predominantly low-income and minority areas.

To satisfy CRA examiners, “flexible” lending by large banks rose an average 5% and those loans defaulted about 15% more often, the 43-page study found.

The strongest link between CRA lending and defaults took place in the runup to the crisis — 2004 to 2006 — when banks rapidly sold CRA mortgages for securitization by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Wall Street.

CRA regulations are at the core of Fannie’s and Freddie’s so-called affordable housing mission. In the early 1990s, a Democrat Congress gave HUD the authority to set and enforce (through fines) CRA-grade loan quotas at Fannie and Freddie.

It passed a law requiring the government-backed agencies to “assist insured depository institutions to meet their obligations under the (CRA).” The goal was to help banks meet lending quotas by buying their CRA loans.
New Study Finds Democrats Fully to Blame for Subprime Mortgage Crisis that Caused 2008 Financial Disaster

But they had to loosen underwriting standards to do it. And that’s what they did.
You're idiotically blaming Obama for taking action to get more CRA loans to minorities when the CRA had nothing to do with the meltdown, as I showed you.
 
Oh and by the way... the housing crisis that caused the economic bubble to bust under GWB... was directly linked to Obama!
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices.

As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
With landmark lawsuit, Barack Obama pushed banks to give subprime loans to Chicago’s African-Americans

But of course you really dumb people never provide links to your dumb ass unsubstantiated comments.
SEE ABOVE!!!

Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.


And you still don't seem to understand... you don't make dumb ass conclusions when the facts are in your face!
I never said the CRA was the sole cause of the collapse!
It was as your above that 6% of the all higher-priced loans WAS part of the problem.
But the mentality of people flipping houses was the problem.
Here’s something that won’t get any play in the liberal media…
A new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research found that Democrats are to blame for the subprime mortgage crisis.
Investor’s Business Daily reported:

Democrats and the media insist the Community Reinvestment Act, the anti-redlining law beefed up by President Clinton, had nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis and recession.

But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks.”

Added NBER: “There is a clear pattern of increased defaults for loans made by these banks in quarters around the (CRA) exam. Moreover, the effects are larger for loans made within CRA tracts,” or predominantly low-income and minority areas.

To satisfy CRA examiners, “flexible” lending by large banks rose an average 5% and those loans defaulted about 15% more often, the 43-page study found.

The strongest link between CRA lending and defaults took place in the runup to the crisis — 2004 to 2006 — when banks rapidly sold CRA mortgages for securitization by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Wall Street.

CRA regulations are at the core of Fannie’s and Freddie’s so-called affordable housing mission. In the early 1990s, a Democrat Congress gave HUD the authority to set and enforce (through fines) CRA-grade loan quotas at Fannie and Freddie.

It passed a law requiring the government-backed agencies to “assist insured depository institutions to meet their obligations under the (CRA).” The goal was to help banks meet lending quotas by buying their CRA loans.
New Study Finds Democrats Fully to Blame for Subprime Mortgage Crisis that Caused 2008 Financial Disaster

But they had to loosen underwriting standards to do it. And that’s what they did.
You're idiotically blaming Obama for taking action to get more CRA loans to minorities when the CRA had nothing to do with the meltdown, as I showed you.

You did show AT ALL dummy that CRA had nothing to do with it!
Geez... But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks!!!
Do you understand? At least I know CRA wasn't the sole cause but idiots like you say.."CRA had nothing to do with the meltdown!"
What is your problem with reality? I would be concerned with your skill sets as a "software engineer" with your ability to use rational, logical
decisions. Your unsubstantiated statements speak volumes to your "skill"!
 
Trump's economy is booming—repealing tariffs will boost it even more
Trump's economy is booming—repealing tariffs will boost it even more
08/04/19 07:00 AM EDT

You have probably heard the saying “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”
That saying could be applied to our economy right now. In this regard, it seems that President Trump can do almost no wrong, with the Dow and S&P 500 hitting all-time highs in July, job growth continuing to exceed expectations, and unemployment at a 50-year low.
The catalyst for this booming economy can be found in the president’s regulation slashing early in his presidency and his signing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which put more money back in the hands of American companies and families
........

ME: Just a reminder of why we voted for Trump. Promises Made, Promises Kept!
A booming economy. And the wall is starting to go up. Unemployment is at a 50 year low. God Bless Donald J Trump!

The tariffs he started?


https://images.dailykos.com/images/747482/story_image/comparison_trump_obama1.png?1576449835
 
Great post

Hard to argue with the facts and history! Obama as a lawyer worked on the above lawsuit that was settled out of court BUT
opened the door to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that led to the wild uncontrolled speculation by truly ignorant people buying
homes and rolling them over. Some of these dummies bought multiple homes THROUGH CRA and that was a major factor to
the collapse of the housing bubble!
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Too bad for you the CRA wasn't the problem...

The Federal Reserve Board has found no connection between CRA and the subprime mortgage problems. In fact, the Board's analysis (102 KB PDF) found that nearly 60 percent of higher-priced loans went to middle- or higher-income borrowers or neighborhoods, which are not the focus of CRA activity. Additionally, about 20 percent of the higher-priced loans that were extended in low- or moderate-income areas, or to low- or moderate-income borrowers, were loans originated by lenders not covered by the CRA. Our analysis found that only six percent of all higher-priced loans were made by CRA-covered lenders to borrowers and neighborhoods targeted by the CRA. Further, our review of loan performance found that rates of serious mortgage delinquency are high in all neighborhood groups, not just in lower-income areas.

FRB: Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) contribute to foreclosures and the financial crisis? And, is the CRA being reformed?

... and *poof* ... just like that, all your nonsense crumbles.


And you still don't seem to understand... you don't make dumb ass conclusions when the facts are in your face!
I never said the CRA was the sole cause of the collapse!
It was as your above that 6% of the all higher-priced loans WAS part of the problem.
But the mentality of people flipping houses was the problem.
Here’s something that won’t get any play in the liberal media…
A new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research found that Democrats are to blame for the subprime mortgage crisis.
Investor’s Business Daily reported:

Democrats and the media insist the Community Reinvestment Act, the anti-redlining law beefed up by President Clinton, had nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis and recession.

But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks.”

Added NBER: “There is a clear pattern of increased defaults for loans made by these banks in quarters around the (CRA) exam. Moreover, the effects are larger for loans made within CRA tracts,” or predominantly low-income and minority areas.

To satisfy CRA examiners, “flexible” lending by large banks rose an average 5% and those loans defaulted about 15% more often, the 43-page study found.

The strongest link between CRA lending and defaults took place in the runup to the crisis — 2004 to 2006 — when banks rapidly sold CRA mortgages for securitization by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Wall Street.

CRA regulations are at the core of Fannie’s and Freddie’s so-called affordable housing mission. In the early 1990s, a Democrat Congress gave HUD the authority to set and enforce (through fines) CRA-grade loan quotas at Fannie and Freddie.

It passed a law requiring the government-backed agencies to “assist insured depository institutions to meet their obligations under the (CRA).” The goal was to help banks meet lending quotas by buying their CRA loans.
New Study Finds Democrats Fully to Blame for Subprime Mortgage Crisis that Caused 2008 Financial Disaster

But they had to loosen underwriting standards to do it. And that’s what they did.
You're idiotically blaming Obama for taking action to get more CRA loans to minorities when the CRA had nothing to do with the meltdown, as I showed you.

You did show AT ALL dummy that CRA had nothing to do with it!
Geez... But a new study by the respected National Bureau of Economic Research finds, “Yes, it did. We find that adherence to that act led to riskier lending by banks!!!
Do you understand? At least I know CRA wasn't the sole cause but idiots like you say.."CRA had nothing to do with the meltdown!"
What is your problem with reality? I would be concerned with your skill sets as a "software engineer" with your ability to use rational, logical
decisions. Your unsubstantiated statements speak volumes to your "skill"!
Your link doesn't go to the text you posted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top