Trump Will Be Impeached

[Third Party]

Don't know that Trump will be impeached, my concern is not primarily about him finishing his term in office, even those who agree with most of his policy's but have shown concern with his way of conducting business need too consider that should he be reelected he will have NO constraints on him. Trump unleashed is a real worry.

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

 

[IM2]

He may be impeached but they better get it done quickly before....

That's not going to happen.

 

[IM2]

Don't know that Trump will be impeached, my concern is not primarily about him finishing his term in office, even those who agree with most of his policy's but have shown concern with his way of conducting business need too consider that should he be reelected he will have NO constraints on him. Trump unleashed is a real worry.

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.

 

[Third Party]

Don't know that Trump will be impeached, my concern is not primarily about him finishing his term in office, even those who agree with most of his policy's but have shown concern with his way of conducting business need too consider that should he be reelected he will have NO constraints on him. Trump unleashed is a real worry.

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.

Obama was in his drinking outfit when they got him-he didn't know WHAT was going on-like usual. And comparing him with idiot Bush is a losing proposition. Trump was clear eyed and in control-no Russians in sight.

 

[IM2]

Don't know that Trump will be impeached, my concern is not primarily about him finishing his term in office, even those who agree with most of his policy's but have shown concern with his way of conducting business need too consider that should he be reelected he will have NO constraints on him. Trump unleashed is a real worry.

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.

Obama was in his drinking outfit when they got him-he didn't know WHAT was going on-like usual. And comparing him with idiot Bush is a losing proposition. Trump was clear eyed and in control-no Russians in sight.

We all know you're lying so we'll just move on.

 

[lennypartiv]

no ...the Senate is the Firewall,
it will never impeach the President!

Exactly. McConnell is loyal to Trump, as he should be.

 

[Third Party]

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.

Obama was in his drinking outfit when they got him-he didn't know WHAT was going on-like usual. And comparing him with idiot Bush is a losing proposition. Trump was clear eyed and in control-no Russians in sight.

We all know you're lying so we'll just move on.

No you are lying-that is your style!

 

[JustAGuy1]

He is a very STRONG president that many people have trouble handling. Its OK.

Trump is not strong.

Neither Biden nor Obama would have pulled off "THE" RAID. Trump strong!

Obama got Bin Laden after Bush couldn't find him. And he didn't have to get permission from Russia to do it.

Obama was in his drinking outfit when they got him-he didn't know WHAT was going on-like usual. And comparing him with idiot Bush is a losing proposition. Trump was clear eyed and in control-no Russians in sight.

We all know you're lying so we'll just move on.

That's rich from perhaps the most prolific liar on the Board. It's worse than you think, Bush let him escape from Tora Bora.

 

[The Original Tree]

Apparently it’s coming out The Fake Whistle Blower was involved with the Fake Russian Collusion Hoax now.

LMFAO.

The New Democrat Party is Evil and should not be allowed to have power.

 

[g5000]

I must say I was wrong when I predicted a little over a month ago that Trump would be censured by the House, and not impeached.

It looks almost certain now the House will impeach him.

 

[g5000]

no ...the Senate is the Firewall,
it will never impeach the President!

Exactly. McConnell is loyal to Trump, as he should be.

Wrong. McConnell should be loyal to the Constitution, not Trump.

 

[Jackson]

The time has come for Trump.

Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz

Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.

Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”

It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.

There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.

There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.

Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:

“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”

Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment

Trump has a guest coming to visit

And he doesn't worry about invitations​

I didn't bother reading your novel, for the premise is blatantly stupid. It's as if you are certain of the winner of the next Super Bowl. You and your link don't know any more than anyone else.

Go talk to John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary Magazine if you have a problem.

You are the one with the problem, friend. Neither you nor your friend can fortell the future. Did you not learn that in 2016?

No, you have the problem. I don't know John Podhoretz. And it is not 2016. You Trump lickers can't see that. Number 1, we are talking about an impeachment after a public hearing where we see the facts. Trump can't lose the congressional vote and be saved by the electoral college. Once congress votes to impeach, he's impeached. And as the article points out, the evidence of the misdeeds have been shown. The Russians can't flood congress with bots Jackson. Trump will be impeached. The question is whether the senate will convict him.

To be literally correct, you can say Trump is LIKELY to be impeached. To make a more accurate prediction, one must examine each representative's voting locale, whether it is a red or blue state and the party each representative belongs to. Then we can see this is not for the truth but for the political strength.

The worst one can say about Trump is that impeachment iis likely due to his penchance for tweeting,and immature name calliing. On the other hand, he has become the most effective president we've had.

He is a very popular president with most of the nation, I wonder what the 2020 election will be like if he is impeached but not convicted, proving this was an excercise of politics when the nation's work went on without an effective congress.

And that is the truth..

 

[M14 Shooter]

Trump can't lose the congressional vote and be saved by the electoral college.

Nope.
But he --can-- be impeached and not removed - at which point nothing changes and 3+ years of whining and crying from the left is for naught.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

An emerging defense of Trump by Trump Republicans is they will admit the obvious, but they are being coy about it. Some are saying that, yes, it is true, Trump did ask the Ukrainian President to investigate the Bidens, but that is not an impeachable offense.

That is like saying, yes, it is true, my friend did withdraw money from the bank, omitting the fact that the man's friend robbed the bank.

Similarly, Trump Republicans will not say that, in the wake of the 2016 election, Russian interference in our election on behalf of Trump, and the Mueller Report, that Trump requested foreign interference in our Presidential election on his behalf.

Nor will they admit that Trump's own chief of staff told a television audience that Trump used quid pro quo to get what he wanted. That amounts to bribery, an impeachable offense in its own right.

Trump Republicans may try to get this by American voters, but, when the impeachment inquiry goes public, Americans will learn the truth. Following the 2016 election and foreign interference in that election, it is extremely doubtful Americans will accept that as business as usual in 2020.

There is no wonder why Trump will not allow his people to testify to all this. Thus, his obstruction of Congress and the game of delay. It is the only thing he can do.

 

[Third Party]

An emerging defense of Trump by Trump Republicans is they will admit the obvious, but they are being coy about it. Some are saying that, yes, it is true, Trump did ask the Ukrainian President to investigate the Bidens, but that is not an impeachable offense.

That is like saying, yes, it is true, my friend did withdraw money from the bank, omitting the fact that the man's friend robbed the bank.

Similarly, Trump Republicans will not say that, in the wake of the 2016 election, Russian interference in our election on behalf of Trump, and the Mueller Report, that Trump requested foreign interference in our Presidential election on his behalf.

Nor will they admit that Trump's own chief of staff told a television audience that Trump used quid pro quo to get what he wanted. That amounts to bribery, an impeachable offense in its own right.

Trump Republicans may try to get this by American voters, but, when the impeachment inquiry goes public, Americans will learn the truth. Following the 2016 election and foreign interference in that election, it is extremely doubtful Americans will accept that as business as usual in 2020.

There is no wonder why Trump will not allow his people to testify to all this. Thus, his obstruction of Congress and the game of delay. It is the only thing he can do.

How's this-He did not ask for dirt on Biden-he wanted to make sure corruption was not going to take our money and that they help us clear up the 2016 election interference. Fixed it for you.

 

[M14 Shooter]

An emerging defense of Trump by Trump Republicans is they will admit the obvious, but they are being coy about it. Some are saying that, yes, it is true, Trump did ask the Ukrainian President to investigate the Bidens, but that is not an impeachable offense.

Look at you, still spamming the same nonsense across several topics.

Why do you think people running against an incumbent white house are immune to federal investigations into their past acts while in federal office?
Why do you think asking the government of another country to help investigate the possible corrupt actions of a VPotUS with regard to that country is immoral, illegal or impeachable?

 

[Third Party]

Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump's staunchest supporters, appears to be confused. His latest defense of Trump is that Trump's Ukraine policy is "incoherent." No kidding, that is what he said.

"What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward Ukraine: It was incoherent, it depends on who you talk to, they seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo," Graham said.

Graham told reporters that he would not be reading newly released deposition transcripts, calling the Democratic-led impeachment probe a “bunch of BS."

Graham told us that he hopes the President will be able to call his own witnesses. Assuming it would be the White House staff who would support Trump on the witness stand, apparently Graham doesn't know that it is the President who is stonewalling White House staff from testifying.

When Fox News host Martha MacCallum asked Graham about Sondland's testimony, Graham contrived a conspiracy accusing Sondland of switching up his testimony because of a “connection” with Democratic operatives.

“Why did [Sondland] change his testimony?” Graham said. “Was there a connection between [Sondland] and Democratic operatives on the committee? Did he talk to Schiff? Did he talk to Schiff’s staffers?”

Graham didn't even know the name of the witness. He kept referring to Gordon Sondland as “Sunderland.”

It is clear that Graham is losing it, and the Senator has no idea what is going on. Was he sober when he said that? This conspiracy is beyond comprehension.
Sondland is, after all, a Trump-appointed ambassador, a poltical appointee, not an experienced envoy. He is also a Republican mega-donor who reportedly contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee.

This is the same ambassador whom Trump recently described as “a really good man” and a “great American.”

And yet, we’re now supposed to believe that Sondland may be in league with House Democrats?

Well, according to Graham, that is a possibility. Actually, Sondland revised his testimony because his lawyer told him that perjury in a Congressional hearing is a federal crime punishable by imprisonment. In his previous testimony, Sondland lied to protect Trump.

Graham is the perfect example of the confusion and the problems Trump Republicans have trying desperately to come up with some angle to defend Trump. As Graham illustrates, it is a losing endeavor.

There should be no defense necessary-Russia hoax, Mueller hoax, now Ukraine hoax. Democrats usually tax us to death, now they are hoaxing us to death.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump's staunchest supporters, appears to be confused..

You can believe whatever delusional crap you want - It won't change anything.
Trump will remain your President until at least January 2021

 

[Sandy Shanks]

The Times reports, "John R. Bolton, President Trump’s former national security adviser, knows about “many relevant meetings and conversations” connected to the Ukraine pressure campaign that House impeachment investigators have not yet been informed about, his lawyer told lawmakers on Friday.

"The lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, made that tantalizing point in a letter to the chief House lawyer in response to House committee chairmen who have sought Mr. Bolton’s testimony in their impeachment proceedings, arguing that his client would be willing to talk but only if a court rules that he should ignore White House objections."

Bolton did not show up for a deposition scheduled on Thursday because, his lawyer said, he wants a judge to determine whether he should testify in defiance of the White House.

What is Bolton trying to say here? Bolton strongly opposed Trump's attempt to use extortion in a request for foreign interference in our Presidential election to benefit the President politically, and he referred to Trump's personal lawyer, Giuliani, as a “hand grenade who’s going to blow everybody up,”, describing exactly what is happening now. The whole mess is blowing up in Trump's face.

Bolton was fired on September 10, about the time the hand grenade was going off in the Oval Office. Schiff was informed of the whistleblower's complaint on September 11.

Despite not showing up this week, does Bolton want to testify? Testifying would certainly help his book sales.

Or, despite their differences, does the outspoken conservative want to come to Trump's aid? Is he trying to drag this out with court fight?

One thing is true. If it is the latter, the Democrats are not biting although they would to have Bolton testify. They have had their fill of Trump's delaying tactics. They will welcome Bolton if he comes in voluntarily, but they are through with the subpoena business. In the meantime they will trot out their own witnesses.

They will be unimpeded by Trump. Stupidly, Trump will not allow his witnesses to appear in the impeachment inquiry which will go public next week.

The Democrats are delighted with Trump's incriminating recalcitrance.

 

[Meister]

Wow! Number 1000